For every 100 women. . .

Disgusting. We’ve abandoned our young men for the sake of feminism.

quote:

---

“But women do not prefer to marry losers…”
More than that, women prefer to not “marry down”, even to those who are not losers. What are all those college educated women going to do when there are not enough high status, successful men to go around? Aside from whining about the unfairness of it all, I mean.

---

Comment from the article in response to another person giving a cliche feminist defense.

It's TRUE. The real problem is that women want the success men have but dont want the responsibility that comes with that success. Men generally marry down (ie pick a women who makes less) because that's what societal norms have led to until the modern era.

I have nothing against a woman being in a wealthy or high-end career. But these women always want a man who makes just as much or more.

With the current rate of education, that balance of richer men to women will continue to narrow.


Edit: the other issue is that education by itself is overrated. All majors are not created equal. A plumber probably makes more in his lifetime than an English major, etc.

And I know people study liberal arts cam be well off. But the reality is that the majority of them end up in jobs that dont utilize their education.

Well, that's not good.

Maybe we should disallow them from some of those positive things?

quote:

---

Men have unfair advantages bro.

---

We're hunters and gathers and the only unfair advantage we have is work ethic

Men occupy both the lower and upper ends of the bell curve while women occupy the middle.

quote:

---

All the research I've done points to a gender difference in general cognitive ability. There is a mean difference of about five IQ points. The further you go up the distribution the more and more skewed it becomes. There are twice as many men with an IQ of 120-plus as there are women, there are 30 times the number of men with an IQ of 170-plus as there are women.

I don't know why this is, all I can say is that we have a huge amount of data.

---

LINK

Women may be as smart on average. But when you talk about genius-level IQ, there are significantly more men. There are also more men at the below average levels. Degrees that require more intelligence like math and engineering are still majority male. There are also programs that provide further assistance to females in these areas but there are none that solely benefit males. So, average males fall while average females rise.

Schools have become female-centric, so the smart males still succeed but the average to below average males struggle more than their female cohorts.

Chalmetteowl is also correct. An average to below average female can find a male to take care of her. Average to below average males usually have to fend for themselves which is why there are more homeless and addicted males.

The justice system is also much more lenient on women. Women typically get much lower sentences for the same crimes than men do.

The whole "woman are oppressed" narrative is total bullshite. Men may occupy most of the highest levels, but they occupy most of the lowest levels as well. Overall, women have it easier. Men in STEM have to excel to get scholarships. Women get scholarships and assistance just for being women in STEM. Try getting a SBA loan, a government grant, or a scholarship. White males have the hardest time. Women, especially minority women, have the easiest time.

Men are expected to succeed or fail on their own merits while women are constantly propped up in some manner.

And just who created this chart of numbers?

quote:

---

And just who created this chart of numbers?

---

Missing data?

Injured/Killed in Military Service
Wounded in Combat
Die in Combat

quote:

---

Missing data?

---

Happily married?
Teach Sunday school?
Gave birth to wonderful children?
Love their husbands?
Use a snowblower?
Mow the grass?
Make a great sandwich?

Thanks. I didn't open the link. Thought the author was secret because there's no credit given on the chart. Thinking this was some Obama-thing.

Yeah I don’t think that Obama and politicians who agree with a lot of his social
Policies would publish the bottom half of the graph as it paints a picture far different than what they want. Now that I think about it, they probably don’t want the top half published either