Started By
Message

re: Food stamp prohibitions

Posted on 8/8/18 at 10:28 pm to
Posted by ClientNumber9
Member since Feb 2009
10097 posts
Posted on 8/8/18 at 10:28 pm to
quote:


You don't know every single person that's on food stamps and/or welfare. A lot of them are genuinely good people who have had a rough go of


You give money to panhandlers at intersections, don't you?
Posted by BurningHeart
Member since Jan 2017
10061 posts
Posted on 8/8/18 at 10:54 pm to
quote:

You give money to panhandlers at intersections, don't you?


Seems like he fled after being challenged on his SNAP viewpoint.

I don't know if he works for the government, but he sure acts like it.

"Everything is fine with SNAP. People need it. Now move along."

Zero critical thinking. Just accept the status quo.
Posted by Lickitty Split
Inside
Member since Apr 2017
4148 posts
Posted on 8/8/18 at 11:16 pm to
I’m thinking he worked for the government too.

His racist comment pissed me off though. Basically, I’m a redneck drunk who cannot think past high school level because I would like to limit people who receive snap benefits from gambling at a casino, going to a strip club, or buying alcohol or cigarettes.
Posted by Ollieoxenfree99
Member since Aug 2018
7748 posts
Posted on 8/8/18 at 11:45 pm to
It used to be shameful to accept any kind of welfare. The restrictions listed in the OP and throughout this thread would bring that back somewhat as a public sentiment.

Of course some fall on hard times, but most here are talking about people that live off welfare and have more kids to get more money.
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
26299 posts
Posted on 8/8/18 at 11:47 pm to
Moar gubment is the solution
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
62893 posts
Posted on 8/9/18 at 8:48 am to
quote:

How in the world would you know?! Do you know every disabled person in Louisiana?



That's a nonsensical standard you are setting. He needs to know every disabled person in order to make an obvious comment about disability?
Posted by CptRusty
Basket of Deplorables
Member since Aug 2011
11740 posts
Posted on 8/9/18 at 8:51 am to
quote:

Somebody loves some big government.


The ideal solution would be not to have foodstamps in the first place, but if we're going to have them I don't see any problem with them coming with strings attached.

Thad said the OP's premise is, of course, silly.
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
12845 posts
Posted on 8/9/18 at 9:01 am to
quote:

All you have to do is require people to swipe their drivers license or ID, if swipeable. If it isn’t swipeable then you should have to provide a form of ID that is then run through the same database of individuals who receive snap benefits.

I’ve been saying this forever.. you know what we really need in this country? More databases. I’m in support of RFID chips implanted at birth. If we link it to our Google search data we can keep people with Columbine obsessions from buying guns, too!

Seriously.. remember when we actually gave a shite about our privacy? Yeah you’re right.. me neither.

quote:

They will just get someone else to purchase it for them. Make it a felony to purchase cigarettes or alcohol for a person receiving snap benefits punishable by a minimum of a year in prison with hard labor.


Also, I know we have the highest percentage of incarcerated citizens in the world.. but this is just good policy! Think of all the lives that will be saved.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
117478 posts
Posted on 8/9/18 at 9:58 am to
We could save the postage of delivery for all forms of welfare checks and food stamps by sending them in bulk packaging to the closest liquor store of the recipient.

That way the recipient can pick them up where he does his banking, buying his lottery tickets and purchasing his Malt Liquor.
Posted by tommy2tone1999
St. George, LA
Member since Sep 2008
7779 posts
Posted on 8/9/18 at 10:41 am to
It's really a simple formula. Middle and upper class paying taxes so that vulnerables can collect bennies.

Vulnerables spend their cash in casinos which are taxed. Government collects more revenue to make up for bennies handed out.

Government has created an entitled dependency class which will never vote against their own handouts, money will forever flow in to the government.
This post was edited on 8/9/18 at 10:42 am
Posted by HonoraryCoonass
Member since Jan 2005
20177 posts
Posted on 8/9/18 at 10:58 am to
quote:

Nobody on this earth is better than anybody else.


Come on! That’s absurd.
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 8/9/18 at 11:06 am to
quote:

Nobody on this earth is better than anybody else.


Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 8/9/18 at 11:07 am to
quote:

The ideal solution would be not to have foodstamps in the first place, but if we're going to have them I don't see any problem with them coming with strings attached.



I would much rather them hand out commodities, to be honest.
Posted by NCdawgfan34
North Carolina
Member since Jun 2015
1037 posts
Posted on 8/9/18 at 11:12 am to
Holy shite ya'll sound like a bunch of fricking commies hahaha. You are worried about a program that litterally cost pennies and want to regulate it and make the government pay more to regulate it even further than the actually cost of it. White ppl are going to be affected the most sense they take up most of the population who are on food stamps. Odyssey is right damn ya'll some fricked up ppl. I mean damn ya'll. Hey this is America lets limit ppls freedoms and pick on the poor ones for costing us and extra 10 cent every paycheck and be okay with subsidizing huge banks and oil billionaires that cost us far more. Bunch of fricking clowns.
Posted by Lickitty Split
Inside
Member since Apr 2017
4148 posts
Posted on 8/9/18 at 11:17 am to
There is already a database full of every snap receipent. All you would have to do is require strip clubs and casinos to swipe all IDs. This is not more government or more databases.

I love how some people are so dense or pretend to be so dense in order to stifle accountability and responsibility.
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 8/9/18 at 11:21 am to
quote:

Holy shite ya'll sound like a bunch of fricking commies hahaha. You are worried about a program that litterally cost pennies and want to regulate it and make the government pay more to regulate it even further than the actually cost of it. White ppl are going to be affected the most sense they take up most of the population who are on food stamps. Odyssey is right damn ya'll some fricked up ppl. I mean damn ya'll. Hey this is America lets limit ppls freedoms and pick on the poor ones for costing us and extra 10 cent every paycheck and be okay with subsidizing huge banks and oil billionaires that cost us far more. Bunch of fricking clowns.




This seems a touch melty.
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 8/9/18 at 11:26 am to
This just came up in my life today.

Stopped at Casey's this morning to fill up with gas, ran into get a drink as well so didn't pay at the pump. I'm in line and the guy in front of me is buying 4 sodas and a dozen donuts, he whips out his EBT card and pays for those, then tells the cashier "I also need X lottery cards" and pays cash for $40 worth the lottery tickets

Yes, I said something. I'm a dick like that , no he wasn't stupid enough to say anything back. He just took his ill gotten items and wandered off.

However, I believe it would cost more to monitor these assholes than it would to just let them get away with this type of stuff , so let's just concentrate government resources on catching actual fraud, while subjecting these type of fools to public ridicule.
Posted by BurningHeart
Member since Jan 2017
10061 posts
Posted on 8/9/18 at 11:27 am to
quote:

You are worried about a program that litterally cost pennies


You call 5% of the state budget pennies?

Not even going to ask if you understand the other economic benefits of getting people off their butts and into a job, because I already know you don't understand.

By the way, based on your post I'm 95% certain you are on food stamps.
Posted by NCdawgfan34
North Carolina
Member since Jun 2015
1037 posts
Posted on 8/9/18 at 11:34 am to
If that is what you want for food stamp recipients then lets do the same for Eaton Corp, McDermott International, Iberdrola, NextEra Energy, NRG energy, Bank of America, Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, Boeing, GE. Accept all their owners, board memebers, and executives can't go to any sporting event, buy airplanes, well honestly antyhing other than necessities because they receive well over 150 Billion while SNAP if well under half that. Funny thing is 93.2% of SNAP costs go straight to recipients while corporate subsidies don't go to the workers in those industries it goes to higer salaries for executives. The crazy thing is the government who can't run anything right actually does a much more efficient job in providing SNAP than the corporations who take far more in tax payer money.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
74091 posts
Posted on 8/9/18 at 11:37 am to
Commies? Really?

I think it’s perfectly fair that if you are on state aid, the taxpayers should be allowed to decide what you can and cannot eat with those funds
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram