Started By
Message

Flock camera installer calls police after being filmed in public

Posted on 9/14/26 at 5:40 am
Posted by weagle1999
Member since May 2025
3985 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 5:40 am
As Keefe began to shoot video, the installer saw him and immediately packed up his equipment and drove away, so Keefe also returned to his car and followed several cars behind, hoping to document the next stop.

The technician called 911.

“I work with Flock Safety. And I called originally because I’m getting followed,” the installer can be heard telling a dispatcher after being transferred. “I was getting harassed, pretty much. Taking videos and pictures. And now, the same vehicle that pulled over where I was working at has been following me.”

LINK

Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
99413 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 5:44 am to
I’m TeamFlock for this.

That is sensitive city equipment. Do you sit around and get in the face of pothole fillers?

Every and all “citizen auditors” need their face bashed in. They are all a bunch of pussified man children who do it to stir the pot and piss you people off. And since they won’t square up to you, they will pull mace like the pussies they are.

Screw those people and hope they get run over by a hippie minivan.
Posted by weagle1999
Member since May 2025
3985 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 5:46 am to
No one forced the installer to work for Flock.
Posted by CollegeFBRules
Member since Oct 2008
25918 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 5:57 am to
Harassing the technician installing the equipment is classless.
Posted by Placekicker
Florida
Member since Jan 2016
14562 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 6:00 am to
quote:

Flock camera installer calls police after being filmed in public


Posted by LSUSUPERSTAR
TX
Member since Jan 2005
17134 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 6:34 am to
Read the article, the investigator didnt even speak to the flock installer, just documenting locations.
Posted by CollegeFBRules
Member since Oct 2008
25918 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 6:43 am to
quote:

Read the article, the investigator didnt even speak to the flock installer, just documenting locations.


You don’t have to speak to someone to harass them.
Posted by Hondo Blacksheep
Member since Jul 2022
3612 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 6:57 am to
Why is he documenting camera locations? I've never felt inclined to do such things.
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
42881 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 7:00 am to
quote:

You don’t have to speak to someone to harass them.

This post is peak irony when applied to Flock cameras themselves.
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
21152 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 7:15 am to
No the true irony is that libertarians dont want to be filmed, and support someone filming, thats the true irony.

As has been said many times, Flock cameras are a tool, if they are used for nefarious purposes, deal with that issue. We have bad cops, does that mean we get rid of the police department?

Flock cameras have solved a thousand crimes for every one time someone posts some story about a rogue cop tracking his ex. Before Flock he probably followed her around......does that mean we take all police cars off the road?

We saw a recent case where a person in CSI altered DNA results do we get rid of any DNA analysis, what about fingerprints, what about cell phone tracking?

Posted by Dee_oh_Dee
Member since Aug 2024
383 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 7:17 am to
quote:

Harassing the technician installing the equipment is classless.



These flockers can eat all of the dicks.
Posted by LSUSUPERSTAR
TX
Member since Jan 2005
17134 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 7:22 am to
It's crazy to me how fast people here have accepted the overt surveillance state. Before it was done in the shadows, now they are rolling it out in the open and people are defending it.

How about hiring and training more police to get out in the communities? Instead we have a bunch of revenue generating ticket jockies.
Posted by Prodigal Son
Member since May 2023
2005 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 7:23 am to
quote:

quote: You don’t have to speak to someone to harass them.

This post is peak irony when applied to Flock cameras themselves.

Louder!
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus
Member since Jan 2018
11932 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 7:27 am to
quote:

Why is he documenting camera locations? I've never felt inclined to do such things.


I've never felt inclined to put up cameras to track the movement of supposedly free citizens.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
92000 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 7:29 am to
quote:

It's crazy to me how fast people here have accepted the overt surveillance state. Before it was done in the shadows, now they are rolling it out in the open and people are defending it.



It wasn't done in the shadows. You just didn't care.





Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
92000 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 7:31 am to
quote:

I've never felt inclined to put up cameras to track the movement of supposedly free citizens.



People use cameras all the time to track humans.


People generally do it for safety and protection.



If you drive around with a dash cam. It's to capture human behavior while driving.

Posted by Steadyhands
Slightly above I-10
Member since May 2016
7208 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 7:35 am to
quote:

Flock cameras have solved a thousand crimes for every one time someone posts some story about a rogue cop tracking his ex.


Complete bullshite.

Very few crimes are solved with flock that couldn't have been solved otherwise, or prevented altogether, if criminals were dealt with properly.
Posted by JellyRoll
Member since Apr 2024
2329 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 7:48 am to
quote:

It's crazy to me how fast people here have accepted the overt surveillance state. Before it was done in the shadows, now they are rolling it out in the open and people are defending it.



It's absolutely amazing to me.
Posted by JellyRoll
Member since Apr 2024
2329 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 7:50 am to
quote:

It wasn't done in the shadows. You just didn't care.



When was the first time you were notified of Flock Cameras being installed throughout your city?
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
28908 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 7:55 am to
quote:

As has been said many times, Flock cameras are a tool,


We could have 100% DNA and fingerprint registration for all citizens and that would just be a "tool" as well. Calling something a tool isn't an argument for or against it.

quote:

if they are used for nefarious purposes,


Apparently it's when they're used for nefarious purposes, not if. And the people with the power to abuse it have the power of the government behind them. If you don't see the downside to that I don't know what else to tell you.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram