- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Female Chopper Pilot's LinkedIn Nuked from space a few minutes ago
Posted on 2/2/25 at 9:22 am to Stinger_1066
Posted on 2/2/25 at 9:22 am to Stinger_1066
quote:
She was 28 and owned a $570K home in DC. She was working at the Whitehouse as a "volunteer". Hmmm
Thank you for proving you are low intelligence and have low critical thinking skills.
0-3, working in DC equals a $3100/mo housing allowance. 0-3 base pay rate is $7100. She went to college on an ROTC scholarship. Her parents are both Dr’s. Not far fetched her parents gifted her 100K for a down payment.
She bought the house in 2021, interest rates were 3%. She could easily afford that. If she has roommates, even easier.
My daughter is a mid at USNA, those government billets at the Whitehouse are HIGHLY competitive. She’s on the list to give dignitaries tours at the Yard because of her high rank in Order of Merit. (Grades, military, and physical fitness)
4
Posted on 2/2/25 at 9:25 am to BradBallard
quote:
0-3, working in DC equals a $3100/mo housing allowance. 0-3 base pay rate is $7100.
so she is getting a housing allowance and making 84K. Got it. Even 100K down from pops would put her at what, $4,500 to $5K a month for housing? Not counting utilities, etc?
Posted on 2/2/25 at 9:25 am to BradBallard
quote:
She’s on the list to give dignitaries tours at the Yard because of her high rank in Order of Merit. (Grades, military, and physical fitness)
OK, but have you considered that she only got good grades and excelled as a soldier because she's a woman?
Posted on 2/2/25 at 9:26 am to BradBallard
quote:
government billets at the Whitehouse are HIGHLY competitive. She’s on the list to give dignitaries tours at the Yard because of her high rank in Order of Merit. (Grades, military, and physical fitness AND BONUS POINTS FOR HAVING A VAGINA!)
FIFY!
Posted on 2/2/25 at 9:26 am to Mandtgr47
She makes more than $84k in DC.
JFC.
JFC.
Posted on 2/2/25 at 9:27 am to theballguy
quote:People browsing LinkedIn's website wouldn't help LinkedIn's business? Sorry, I don't think that's the precise explanation for whatever happened.
Probably LinkedIn did this to keep people off it. None of it would help their business I'm sure.
Posted on 2/2/25 at 9:28 am to DisplacedBuckeye
He just said her pay was $7,100 a month, plus housing of $3100. 7,100 x 12 is not around 84K? Forgive me great one.
I used to pride myself on getting my CPA...but now it means nothing to me, since you have pointed out how I really don't know numbers.
I used to pride myself on getting my CPA...but now it means nothing to me, since you have pointed out how I really don't know numbers.
This post was edited on 2/2/25 at 9:29 am
Posted on 2/2/25 at 9:33 am to Mandtgr47
Y'all can crunch numbers all you want, but to me an O-3 owning a house is an outlier. This is even more true if it's a house in a metro area like DC.
Posted on 2/2/25 at 9:33 am to Mandtgr47
quote:
He just said her pay was $7,100 a month, plus housing of $3100. 7,100 x 12 is not around 84K? Forgive me great one.
You don't understand that BAH is paid to the servicemember. That also doesn't include BAS, flight pay, incentive pay, ACP, AvB, etc...
It isn't about math. You just don't know what you're talking about.
Posted on 2/2/25 at 9:44 am to neworleansnotsouthla
quote:
lol you make so many excuses. At the end of the day it was a white person. You were screaming DEI hoping it was a black person etc lol.
Dude I work in tech, DEI has the face of a white female.
Posted on 2/2/25 at 9:47 am to Narax
I guess time will tell on that one, but the fact that she was a Biden WH staffer is definitely NOT a good look. It may be the only reason this was held so tight in the beginning.
all the secrecy and social media scrubbing only feeds the beast. They should have left it alone.
all the secrecy and social media scrubbing only feeds the beast. They should have left it alone.
This post was edited on 2/2/25 at 9:48 am
Posted on 2/2/25 at 9:50 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
I guess time will tell on that one, but the fact that she was a Biden WH staffer is definitely NOT a good look. It may be the only reason this was held so tight in the beginning.
all the secrecy and social media scrubbing only feeds the beast. They should have left it alone.
Yup it was a terrible idea, the kind of idea that rich entitled people have. It shows that her family would and may have done anything in their power to enable her, using connections and wealth to get her whatever she wanted.
Posted on 2/2/25 at 9:53 am to AuburnTigers
Nailed it.
The way the libs in this thread keep carrying water for this pilot is a great illustration of where we are at. Just total blinded loyalty to the progressive cause.
Meanwhile many of us are tired of gross incompetence at the highest levels of government and civil service to make you weird frickers feel better about yourselves.
You're literally twisting yourselves into a fricking tranny pretzel to hold serve for someone who may have just killed 60 people due to pilot error.
Us normal folk are tired of the same old shite. Tragedy happens, and within minutes we know the name of the persons involved if it favors your cause. If not, you all get a news cycle to scrub everything about that person from existence.
It's tiresome and predictable yet for some reason you'll sit on your fat arse for hours in front of these threads defending daddy government.
Here's facts for you. A female, woke, biden loving pilot may or may not have just made the largest aviation blunder in decades, and you're coming up with every excuse in the book to defend her.
The way the libs in this thread keep carrying water for this pilot is a great illustration of where we are at. Just total blinded loyalty to the progressive cause.
Meanwhile many of us are tired of gross incompetence at the highest levels of government and civil service to make you weird frickers feel better about yourselves.
You're literally twisting yourselves into a fricking tranny pretzel to hold serve for someone who may have just killed 60 people due to pilot error.
Us normal folk are tired of the same old shite. Tragedy happens, and within minutes we know the name of the persons involved if it favors your cause. If not, you all get a news cycle to scrub everything about that person from existence.
It's tiresome and predictable yet for some reason you'll sit on your fat arse for hours in front of these threads defending daddy government.
Here's facts for you. A female, woke, biden loving pilot may or may not have just made the largest aviation blunder in decades, and you're coming up with every excuse in the book to defend her.
Posted on 2/2/25 at 10:08 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
True, but there are those who are 100% certain that it was, and its embarrassing.
I would put the likelihood of her benefitting from DEI to be much closer to 100% not. I mean, she was an aide to Biden. Why would you so easily dismiss that aspect?
Posted on 2/2/25 at 10:12 am to jimmy the leg
It was Trump's reaction to the incident, followed by all of the secrecy that had people thinking this. But lets be real... its still very premature to say this this was definitely not a factor.
She fricked up bad. Was it because she wasn't adequately qualified? Was that because of DEI or her service to the Biden cause? Was it some sort of psychiatric issue? Was it something else? Eventually, we'll know.
She fricked up bad. Was it because she wasn't adequately qualified? Was that because of DEI or her service to the Biden cause? Was it some sort of psychiatric issue? Was it something else? Eventually, we'll know.
Posted on 2/2/25 at 10:14 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
guess time will tell on that one, but the fact that she was a Biden WH staffer is definitely NOT a good look. It may be the only reason this was held so tight in the beginning.
100% this was the reason for the social media scrub. Undoubtedly there were lots of pictures with prominent dems and verbose gushing about DEI programs.
Posted on 2/2/25 at 10:16 am to 56lsu
quote:
ya'll all sound alike.
When everyone around you is saying that men can't become women, maybe they're right and you're wrong?
Posted on 2/2/25 at 10:16 am to YumYum Sauce
quote:
Here's facts for you. A female, woke, biden loving pilot may or may not have just made the largest aviation blunder in decades, and you're coming up with every excuse in the book to defend her.
Nailed it!
Posted on 2/2/25 at 10:19 am to theballguy
quote:
Because I have no agenda really
“conscious dogmatists and the unconscious dogmatists. I have always found myself that the unconscious dogmatists were the most dogmatic”
GK Chesterton
Posted on 2/2/25 at 10:29 am to jimmy the leg
no i think its creepy that you don't understand how 3rd graders talk to each other. not everyone has their mind in the gutter like you magats.
Page 19 of 25
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News