- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Federal Judge Shuts Down Key Texas Election Integrity Laws
Posted on 10/18/24 at 11:38 am
Posted on 10/18/24 at 11:38 am
quote:
A federal judge continues to block enforcement of Texas election integrity laws.
District Judge Xavier Rodriguez issued an order Friday permanently enjoining state and county officials from investigating or prosecuting alleged violations of “voter assistance” provisions of Senate Bill 1, a comprehensive election integrity measure passed by the Texas Legislature in 2021.
The judge determined that several provisions of SB 1 targeted by voter assistance activists are preempted by Section 208 of the Voting Rights Act, which allows a voter who requires assistance due to a disability or inability to read or write to be assisted by a person of the voter’s choice, other than a person from the voter’s employer or union.
Plaintiffs allege that S.B. 1’s new disclosure requirements (§§ 6.01, 6.03, 6.05, 6.07), modifications to the oath of assistance (§ 6.04), ban on compensated assistance (§ 6.06) and in-person canvassing restriction (§ 7.04) subvert the protections of Section 208 by narrowing the class of eligible assistors, requiring voters to take additional steps as a prerequisite to receiving assistance, and deterring voters from requesting—and assisters from providing—assistance in the voting process.
The plaintiffs include a long list of nominally non-partisan civil rights and social advocacy groups in Texas whose members routinely assist voters by transporting them to the polls and/or helping them complete their mail-in or in-person ballots.
https://dallasexpress.com/state/federal-judge-shuts-down-key-texas-election-integrity-laws/

Posted on 10/18/24 at 11:40 am to loogaroo
He's an obvious bottom bitch.
Posted on 10/18/24 at 11:42 am to loogaroo
These frickin liberal judges have to suffer consequences.
Posted on 10/18/24 at 11:44 am to loogaroo
So done with these frickers
Posted on 10/18/24 at 11:45 am to loogaroo
By any means necessary.
Leftist orthodoxy 101.
Leftist orthodoxy 101.
Posted on 10/18/24 at 11:48 am to loogaroo
The Voter Rights act needs to go
Posted on 10/18/24 at 11:49 am to loogaroo
Appeal it and ignore his BS order.
Posted on 10/18/24 at 11:49 am to bird35
quote:
The laws will eventually be found Constitutional but long after the election is over.
I’m hoping Texas will file something today for an expedited hearing.
Posted on 10/18/24 at 11:51 am to Auburn1968
quote:
Appeal it and ignore his BS order.
Exactly, it should be ignored. Texas might, but Kemp will get on his hands and knees and be an obedient dog though
Posted on 10/18/24 at 11:51 am to LSUGrrrl
Why can't some other Federal Judge overturn his order?
Posted on 10/18/24 at 11:53 am to loogaroo
What's this the third or fourth liberal Federal judge that's suddenly blocked election integrity laws in states trending red? Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania and now Texas.
Nah, this isn't orchestrated at all.
Nah, this isn't orchestrated at all.
Posted on 10/18/24 at 11:55 am to loogaroo
I mean, I know it's rather obvious to those of us with a functioning brain, but why exactly is it that democrats want there to be no election integrity laws whatsoever? None at all?
Posted on 10/18/24 at 11:55 am to loogaroo
quote:
non-partisan civil rights and social advocacy groups
Can the plaintiffs elaborate on just who these are?
If a conservative needs their assistance on election day and thousands more just like them, who will the "non-partisan civil rights" groups allocate their limited resources to help? Does an inability to read or write have to be demonstrated or will they take someone's word for it.
Posted on 10/18/24 at 11:56 am to RolltidePA
quote:
Nah, this isn't orchestrated at all.
Marc Elias is a motherfricker.
Posted on 10/18/24 at 11:57 am to TDTOM
A trial judge may not modify / overrule an order declared by another
on a matter of law.
the first ones interpretation cant be interpreted otherwise
If the order is about a matter of discretion the second judge may modify it, but only circumstances have changed
on a matter of law.
the first ones interpretation cant be interpreted otherwise
If the order is about a matter of discretion the second judge may modify it, but only circumstances have changed
Posted on 10/18/24 at 11:59 am to loogaroo
We gotta start with the judges...
Posted on 10/18/24 at 12:01 pm to loogaroo
Honestly are literacy laws really a bad thing.
In this day and age everyone has access to school and should be able to learn to read.
So let’s bro g back literacy laws
In this day and age everyone has access to school and should be able to learn to read.
So let’s bro g back literacy laws
Posted on 10/18/24 at 12:04 pm to loogaroo
Guess the plan is get activist judges to strike down all election integrity laws right before the election so no time to appeal.
I fricking hate Democrats. Anyone who supports this deserves to hang from a tree
I fricking hate Democrats. Anyone who supports this deserves to hang from a tree
Popular
Back to top


15









