Fed Court NY rules illegals

Sure you can count them but you have to give ICE the list of names and addresses

We gonna count them as 3/5ths of a person?

My dog deserves a vote over “people” not born in this country.

quote:

---

The special three-judge panel in New York unanimously approved an injunction against Trump’s July order. They didn’t rule on whether the order is unconstitutional, but said it would cause harm for the next decade, until the next census is conducted

---

So is not unconstitutional, but we're going to frick the nation for a minimum of 10 years because the orange man is bad.

quote:

---

My dog deserves a vote over “people” born in this country.

---

FIFY

quote:

---

Fed Court NY rules illegals

---

SCOTUS will get that case.

Illegals may be all that’s left in New York, right now....

U.S. Constitution › 14th Amendment

Section 2.
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each state, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the executive and judicial officers of a state, or the members of the legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such state, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such state.

Please note the exception of "Indians not taxed". This is because "Indians not taxed" were not considered as being citizens of the United States or of the States wherein they resided. Such was ruled by the Supreme Court in Elk v Wilkins.

In Elk v. Wilkins, the Supreme Court stated:

(Indians born within the territorial limits of the United States, members of, and owing immediate allegiance to, one of the Indian tribes (an alien though dependent power), although in a geographical sense born in the United States, are no more ‘born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,’ within the meaning of the first section of the fourteenth amendment, than the children of subjects of any foreign government born within the domain of that government, or the children born within the United States, of ambassadors or other public ministers of foreign nations.)

The 14th Amendment was correctly interpreted as such for decades. Hence the need for additional acts to give citizenship to Native Americans and the native inhabitants of territories like Puerto Rico and Guam.

The court having thus decided, it seems quite obvious that the intent of the second section of the Fourteenth Amendment was to exclude all NON CITIZENS from the number of residents counted to determine the apportionment of representatives in Congress. Also note that the second sentence refers specifically to "male inhabitants of such state, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States"
Why are non-citizens being counted today and why do some states such as California and Florida have such a great number of representatives in Congress and votes in the Electoral College ILLEGALLY?

The census results are essential for determining how U.S. House seats, presidential electors, and intrastate seats are apportioned, as well as how hundreds of billions of dollars in federal funds are allocated. Counting non-citizens, who tend to reside in heavily Liberal communities, means that a disproportionate political representation and a disproportionate amount of federal funds are allocated to those areas.

This is from Title 13:The law that governs the census.

Page 25: LINK

Pub. L. 96–369, §118, Oct. 1, 1980, 94 Stat. 1357, provided
that: ‘‘Notwithstanding any other provision of law,
when the President determines that a State, county, or
local unit of general purpose government is significantly affected by a major population change due to a large number of legal immigrants within six months of
a regular decennial census date, he may order a special
census, pursuant to section 196 of title XIII of the
United States Code [this section], or other method of
obtaining a revised estimate of the population, of such
jurisdiction or subsections of that jurisdiction in which
the immigrants are concentrated. If the President decides to conduct a special census, it may be conducted
solely at Federal expense.’’

Logic states that if a large number of immigrants were suddenly received by a state just after the census was completed they would want to count them and receive the representation and funding that that additional population deserves.

This section accomplishes that. However, there is that one pesky term that interferes with an interpretation of the constitution that would allow everyone to be counted.
Only Legal immigrants are to be added to the census if a large enough group comes in after the census is completed. Legal immigrants, not border jumpers, not undocumented refugees, only legal immigrants. You see only legal immigrants are qualified to become citizens. Illegal immigrants are criminals and disqualified to pursue citizenship. They don't count in the Census. If they did this provision would include them in cases of mass migration.

The constitution is not the Law. Congress passes the laws and the Supreme Court uses the constitution to judge those laws when challenged.

I am not a lawyer but this is what the law says.
Prove me wrong.