Favorite team:LSU 
Location:New Orleans
Biography:93 LSU grad
Interests:Hunting, reading, LSU
Occupation:Sales
Number of Posts:346
Registered on:11/3/2005
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
This allows them to purchase inventory in bulk at a discount then purchase a small shipment at an artificially elevated price in order to dynamically update pricing based on current replacement cost.

Companies learned this during COVID. Many had reserve stock in warehouses at say $10.00 per unit cost. During Covd the ships were backed up in the harbor and the fines and extra shipping costs were simply added to the price of goods to say $20. That elevated cost was used to calculate the new elevated selling price, including the sale of the reserve stocks that were purchased pre COVID. Prices were then dynamically elevated across the board on all inventory whether in short supply or not, based on these ratios and new algorithms. Then when COVID went away the prices stayed up.

This dynamic model has been around a long time, but this new iteration is using AI to implement it live across all inventory.

Maximizing artificially increasing consumer pricing outside of true supply and demand calculations. They are all doing it so there are no low price leaders to expose the artificial increases.
I think Elon agreed to cutting tax incentives and other subsidies to his companies in the expectation of serious cuts across the board in all branches of government and the industries it subsidizes.

He agreed in principle with Trump's BBB at 30,000 ft above the legislative table.

However, upon landing it became clear that the uniparty had been laughing at him and Trump the whole time and the BBB, while containing many great things, compromises too much in raising the debt and ignoring the continuing pork.

I think Elon expected Trump, after having been shot, to play hard ball, use the veto power and bully pulpit in order to not continue the old ways of back room deals and pork packed bills. He expected Trump to make the DOJ and FBI to deliver justice.

Elon joined the MAGA movement because of Trump's "Fight, Fight, Fight! response to surviving an assassin's bullet. I think he admired Trump's balls and thought it presented an opportunity to change the status quo. That's why he offered his help.

Either Trump is desperate to get his BBB passed and is willing to compromise principles to do it, or is being advised to deal by uniparty plants.

They are all compromised and by dealing with them Trump appears compromised. That's why Elon brought up the Epstein accusations.

Elon expects Trump to hold Congress and the DOJ to the promises made to the American people.

When the Senate passes the bill back to the house and it is sent to Trump to sign, he should red line it from top to bottom requesting the removal of all pork and requiring no increase in the debt.

When the BBB is amended to meet his expectations and also when all the rescissions have been passed, unaltered from doge recommendations, then sign the BBB into law.

Otherwise Veto. Make them override.

Then Congress can own the pork and the Debt and Elon can help finance their exit from Congress.

Something happened, maybe somebody told Elon he was an idiot if he thought that was how it works, or he saw that Trump is in fact compromised.

Maybe he feels Trump is giving in to the political extortion from the very people that tried to kill him.

Maybe in a (possibly drug induced loss of control) he bluntly called it out and became enraged in a meeting. Rumors abound of him fighting with advisors.

Trump is notorious for being anti drug due to his brother and if those rumors are true he probably felt he had no choice but to step in and remove Elon from the administration meetings.

I hope Trump eventually fullfills Elon's and the promises made, and they reconcile for the good of the country.

Otherwise we all will have been completely disappointed by Trump and have no alternative but to fear the future.


This, including forensic investigation into the judges financial dealing, stock trades, offshore accounts etc.
They really are the engine that powers the corruption. FAFSA judges, empowering political investigations, all the judges ruling over lawfare, bureaucratic protections bolstered by judges, "classified info" and "sources and methods"protected by judges, election evidence dismissed by judges, political prisoners sentenced by judges, and the list goes on and on. Environmental policy, DEI, Immigration, along with every other situation that is diametrically opposed to the will of the people comes to us from the desks of activist judges on the USAID tit or other some other hidden money pool.

It's always the first play. Any law passed, legal ruling, or EO issued that endangers the corruption engines, automatically triggers someone in the shadows to ask the question; What judge do we control that can issue an injunction? That judge is contacted and the marker is called. They don't have a choice. Their ruling is given to them already prepared. There is no real danger to them, other than their legal reputation. No one investigates the situation. The general public forgets their names, the smoke clears and they eventually retire with generational wealth. They are beloved by family and friends for the lifestyle they provide and the corrupted media makes them heroes.
I feel it in my plums. These Judges that rule to block EOs do so with no concern over any backlash. The only thing that would make these insufferable prick's confident in throwing down these political gauntlets is money, lots and lots of money.

Think Judge Smalls in Caddy Shack with his little boat and his club membership. Money makes his world go round and anyone's opinion of him doesn't matter in that world of multi millionaire luxury and influence.
If we jail them, a liberal judge will just release them, and ICE will have to relocate and apprehend them again. Deport them and close the door behind them.

re: Merry Christmas

Posted by DocSavage on 12/25/24 at 12:29 am to
Merry Christmas!
I heard Country cream almost burned down this weekend.
The V.P. should always be the Senate leader for their party whether majority or minority. IMHO.

re: These Tigers inspire.

Posted by DocSavage on 10/16/24 at 9:09 pm to
A poetic play on victor, victorious and historic

AI Overview

"Victoric" means victorious or having won a contest, especially one that requires physical strength or skills. For example, you might call someone the victor if they won a difficult competition or battle.

William Shakespeare is credited with the invention or introduction of over 1,700 words that are still used in English today. William Shakespeare used more than 20,000 words in his plays and poems, and his works provide the first recorded use of over 1,700 words in the English language.

Maybe I just invented another.

These Tigers inspire.

Posted by DocSavage on 10/16/24 at 5:50 pm
Title: These are Tigers


They pull you in, for good or bad.
They may not ought to, but they do.
They give you swagger never had
and add some pride, filling you.

But they are hyped up in their turn.
By poison laurels, lauded the GOAT,
from coachspeak, demanding, leading, stern,
and cocksure crowing from foolish throat.

Lathered hot you feast on the spectacle.
Thirsting for the tears of the day.
Proclaiming bawdry Tiger oracles.
Slipping beneath the Valley's sway.

These men that are not, they come to try.
Trumpets echo, banishing fears.
Their part is simply but to do and die,
while singing hallowed hymns with peers.

The clock runs down, your voice is gone.
The Light Brigade withdraws, blood spent.
Victoric shoulders rise with idols on.
The Valley of Death falls silent.


First draft.

Feel free to suggest edits.




They know they are the minority. They are shipping in voters from everywhere to attempt to change that, but they can't import enough foreigners to gain a majority. The only way they win is through gaming the system in cahoots with corrupt RINOs. Trump has exposed the game. If voting is cleaned up, they might never win another national election.

The difference between R and D is that Rs accept the rule of law even when we suspect shenanigans. We just pick up our campaign signs and start working on the next election. Rs know they are the majority and have faith in the eventual integrity of the election process. Ds on the other hand, attempt assassination and pass laws that allow them to harvest ballots, when they lose they burn cities, and riot, they use corrupt officials to block any actions that threaten their positions through injunctions, impeachment, and lawfare.

Trump is not the "Nazi", you are if you vote R. They live in complete terror of having to live in a society governed by R. If they see no hope of continuing to game the system and hanging on to power they are willing to burn it all down.

If abortion isn't freely available everywhere in their hearts they are oppressed.

If alternative lifestyles aren't taught and encouraged in elementary classrooms in their belief structure emotional and physical holocaust is being practiced.

Christianity must be abolished in their world view.

Requiring work for income is inhumane and cruel.

Earning a profit from selling goods and services to others is evil.

Free speech is subversive and should be regulated.

They are lost in these beliefs, unable to be moved, and unwilling to coexist with anyone that disagrees.

If they ever lose hope of holding power, they will attempt to revolt and burn it all down.

You were looking for a job when you found that one.

Do it again.

Stop feeling bad about yourself if you did the best you could and it just didn't work out. If you did not do your best, this is an opportunity, not a failure.

The only reason to be down on yourself is if you fail to take advantage of the opportunity to be better, work a better job, and live better.

You have the original intent wrong.

Sinners walk stand and sit in sin, or in other words their life is consumed by their sin. Instead of following their example, make your life be consumed with focusing and meditating on God's Law. Do this and and you will be blessed.
Yes.

Public spaces with free access are valid constitutional carry locations. Prisons, schools, courtrooms and all other government properties belong to the people.

I as a citizen am awarded the assumption of innocence until I act unlawfully, especially when it comes to the exercise of the right to bear arms. That is why it was added as an amendment to the Constitution. I have the right to visit a prison, school, courtroom, or congressional meeting etc. while armed and not be treated with suspicion or alarm. Vulnerable individuals (officials, judges, defendants, prisoners, students etc ) who may be targeted by criminals in these places should be protected by barriers and access limitations not by treating innocent people like criminals and infringe their right to self defense of themselves and others.


If any non public (privately owned)space wants to limit weapons for security reasons, then admission to that (limited and defined) space should be restricted, possibly ticketed and secured with pat downs and metal detectors. Lockers should be required to be provided for constitutional carry individuals to store their weapon while in a restricted zone.

Many Boomer and Gen x mothers were/are drug addicted sluts, at a level unseen compared to the generation who raised them. They undermined any attempts at reining in their daughters.
Everyone involved in the detail that day, from planning to on site duty should be treated as a suspect until they are exonerated. Think of a missing wife case, where the husband is automatically a suspect until he is cleared.

This means all of their communications, scoured, all data tracking, location tracking retrieved, undergo lie detector depositions and be isolated from outside contact while questioning occurs of all involved.

re: Salesforce - what is it like?

Posted by DocSavage on 7/17/24 at 6:21 pm to
Think: Micromanaging proctology exam, daily. Soul crushing busy work with the features of location tracking and humiliation.
There are many examples of women being prophets, disciples, apostles and missionaries and even preaching throughout the Bible.

Apparently some friction occurred between the men and women in the Corinth church.

Paul's instructions for the church in Corinth was related to the scriptural teaching that the man is head of the household just as Jesus is head of the church. This was being applied by Paul in the context of families worshipping together as a congregation in Corinth.

The place of leadership in the marriage is the man's. Men were probably objecting to the idea of women teaching men in their communal worship services and wanted clarification from Paul.

(Historical Contex)

In the early church women and men were understood to be equally inspired by the Holy Spirit and filled with His discernment, and gifts to witness and teach, but the marriage relationship required that the man be placed forward in leadership and the woman keep her questions, knowledge, or comments for private counsel with her husband. The Man would be required to be open to her counsel and teaching in private and diligent in teaching her as well so they lived as equals in their marriage. Women and men who were unmarried would be led by married members of the same sex in the same way.

(Modern Context)

Some Baptist churches have no one to assume the pastor position and can't afford to pay someone enough to get them to commit to real long term leadership. If there are no men called to preach and teach in that congregation, but there are women knowledgeable in scripture and gifted with teaching then allowing a woman to preach is logical and not a problem. A woman leading a church as a pastor or preaching or teaching to a mixed crowd of married men and women has the same inspiration and witness as any man, however the men, and especially her husband, if he is a member, has the prerogative to allow her to occupy that position of leadership or not.

A woman has the same responsibility and requirements as a man in the position of preacher/teacher that scripture lays out, (married, undivorced, without moral reproach, etc.), but if a suitable man is sent by God to lead the congregation, then a woman who is truly scripturally inspired would humbly step back into her role as a Christian wife.

Unfortunately, this is not the case for most situations where a Baptist church has a woman pastor. In my experience many of these women reject God's delineated role for them in their marriage and their church. They would be apoplectic at the thought of stepping back for a man to assume their role. This is evidence against them and proof that the spirit that inspires them is not the Holy Spirit.

That is the crucial element.

Whoever is in a position of leadership in a church has to be completely submitted to God's will. We all fall short, so what I mean by submitted is to not be willfully opposed to any of God's teachings.


A woman preaching in the role of missionary or evangelist is not the same situation as in Corinth. It may occur in a church setting, but the congregation is not the local church family made up of married couples in that community, but is a group of random individuals that has gathered together specifically to hear her message. What she teaches is to be qualified through scripture by the individual that is listening just as when a man preaches in this role.