Started By
Message

re: FDA to require the flu vaccine prove its effectiveness at reducing the flu

Posted on 9/24/26 at 8:30 pm to
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
29381 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 8:30 pm to
The annual flu vaccine is based on informed projections of which strains of flu will spread most broadly. How do you demonstrate in advance how accurate the annual projections are prior to peak flu season?
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
100850 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 8:33 pm to
quote:

The annual flu vaccine is based on informed projections of which strains of flu will spread most broadly. How do you demonstrate in advance how accurate the annual projections are prior to peak flu season?


sure it is
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
176017 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 8:35 pm to
quote:

Except we already do research on its effectiveness... you can literally go find it on pubmed right now. LINK

shite like this is a waste of time. I know I'm gonna get called a dumb commie liberal (even though I voted for Trump)

Right. The efficacy has always been posted publicly.

This is one of those things where nothing changes and MAGA seals think it's some epic win.
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
29381 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 8:35 pm to
quote:

sure it is

You would believe it if you read about the world.

Would you believe that one of the methods to predict influenza is by swabbing birds in the marshy plains of Alaska?
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
12045 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 8:46 pm to
You got the AI perfectly in your voice.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
76796 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

none of the childhood vax were ever tested on humans...RFKjr finally got them to admit that.

Care to share a link for this? I'd like to read what was said.
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
99704 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 8:55 pm to
Big pharma living like fat cats. What is their threshold for effectiveness?

10%?
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
12045 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 9:10 pm to
yeah, I think that's the interesting question. I don't think there's a rule saying “10% effective & you're good” kind of a thing. FDA has used several different standards for flu vaccine including surrogate measures like antibody-response/non-inferiority studies rather than a fixed clinical/effectiveness cutoffs. If we're changing that and saying manufacturers now need to show fewer actual cases of flu, I'd want to know what threshold FDA is proposing too. 20%? 40%? and does the lower bound of the confidence interval have to clear it?
Posted by International_Aggie
Member since Oct 2012
2102 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 9:14 pm to
Didn't get the flu vaccine for most of my life. Never got the flu.

Joined the army and had to get one every year. Now it seems like I get sick all the time.

Anectdotal, I know. But I hate the flu vaccine.
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
16615 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 9:17 pm to
This is great and 100% needed.

The other thing the FDA needs to do is actually crack down on the supplement industry. You can sell literal dog shite in a bottle, get a bunch of social media influencers to say it gives you superpowers and the FDA won't do damn thing.
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
12045 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 9:32 pm to
Yeah, some more consistent standards would be good. If we want drug companies to actually demonstrate that their products work, it seems hard to justify letting the supplement world make loosey-goosey health claims with much thinner evidence. Skepticism ought to travel.
Posted by Icansee4miles
Trolling the Tickfaw
Member since Jan 2007
32460 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 9:50 pm to
quote:

VOR


How many Fauci Ouchies have you had by now. I’ll be shocked if you’re not in double digits
Posted by Sams Crow
Idaho
Member since Apr 2026
872 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 11:36 pm to
Maybe they can get the efficacy the creep up into a positive value this year.
That'd be sweet!
Posted by BigTigerJoe
Member since Aug 2022
14780 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 11:51 pm to
It gives you the flu.
Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
51345 posts
Posted on 9/25/26 at 12:00 am to
Well that only took 50 years
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
44956 posts
Posted on 9/25/26 at 5:09 am to
quote:

thrilled with the RFK, Jr. pick by Trump.



The only part of this admin that has delivered everything as promised.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
60601 posts
Posted on 9/25/26 at 6:41 am to
quote:

Sorta like the shingles shot


The opposite from me. While it hurt like a bitch for a day after, I've not had anything symptomatic other than that since then.
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
12748 posts
Posted on 9/25/26 at 11:40 am to
quote:

Care to share a link for this? I'd like to read what was said.


https://joehoft.com/breaking-childrens-health-defense-hits-aap-with-rico-suit-over-fraudulent-vaccine-safety-claims/

RFK jr continued to fight big pharma for years to get them to admit it and finally won.
his website:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
12748 posts
Posted on 9/25/26 at 11:48 am to
quote:

The other thing the FDA needs to do is actually crack down on the supplement industry. You can sell literal dog shite in a bottle, get a bunch of social media influencers to say it gives you superpowers and the FDA won't do damn thing.

There is a conflict of interest.
Posted by Big4SALTbro
Member since Jun 2019
26136 posts
Posted on 9/25/26 at 11:51 am to
RFK has been the best part of Trump 2.0
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram