
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: FDA to require the flu vaccine prove its effectiveness at reducing the flu
Posted on 9/24/26 at 8:30 pm to Ailsa
Posted on 9/24/26 at 8:30 pm to Ailsa
The annual flu vaccine is based on informed projections of which strains of flu will spread most broadly. How do you demonstrate in advance how accurate the annual projections are prior to peak flu season?
Posted on 9/24/26 at 8:33 pm to TBoy
quote:
The annual flu vaccine is based on informed projections of which strains of flu will spread most broadly. How do you demonstrate in advance how accurate the annual projections are prior to peak flu season?
Posted on 9/24/26 at 8:35 pm to BU Bear In BR
quote:
Except we already do research on its effectiveness... you can literally go find it on pubmed right now. LINK
shite like this is a waste of time. I know I'm gonna get called a dumb commie liberal (even though I voted for Trump)
Right. The efficacy has always been posted publicly.
This is one of those things where nothing changes and MAGA seals think it's some epic win.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 8:35 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
sure it is
You would believe it if you read about the world.
Would you believe that one of the methods to predict influenza is by swabbing birds in the marshy plains of Alaska?
Posted on 9/24/26 at 8:46 pm to TulaneLSU
You got the AI perfectly in your voice. 
Posted on 9/24/26 at 8:53 pm to Ailsa
quote:
none of the childhood vax were ever tested on humans...RFKjr finally got them to admit that.
Care to share a link for this? I'd like to read what was said.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 8:55 pm to Ailsa
Big pharma living like fat cats. What is their threshold for effectiveness?
10%?
10%?
Posted on 9/24/26 at 9:10 pm to idlewatcher
yeah, I think that's the interesting question. I don't think there's a rule saying “10% effective & you're good” kind of a thing. FDA has used several different standards for flu vaccine including surrogate measures like antibody-response/non-inferiority studies rather than a fixed clinical/effectiveness cutoffs. If we're changing that and saying manufacturers now need to show fewer actual cases of flu, I'd want to know what threshold FDA is proposing too. 20%? 40%? and does the lower bound of the confidence interval have to clear it?
Posted on 9/24/26 at 9:14 pm to Ailsa
Didn't get the flu vaccine for most of my life. Never got the flu.
Joined the army and had to get one every year. Now it seems like I get sick all the time.
Anectdotal, I know. But I hate the flu vaccine.
Joined the army and had to get one every year. Now it seems like I get sick all the time.
Anectdotal, I know. But I hate the flu vaccine.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 9:17 pm to Ailsa
This is great and 100% needed.
The other thing the FDA needs to do is actually crack down on the supplement industry. You can sell literal dog shite in a bottle, get a bunch of social media influencers to say it gives you superpowers and the FDA won't do damn thing.
The other thing the FDA needs to do is actually crack down on the supplement industry. You can sell literal dog shite in a bottle, get a bunch of social media influencers to say it gives you superpowers and the FDA won't do damn thing.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 9:32 pm to jonnyanony
Yeah, some more consistent standards would be good. If we want drug companies to actually demonstrate that their products work, it seems hard to justify letting the supplement world make loosey-goosey health claims with much thinner evidence. Skepticism ought to travel.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 9:50 pm to VOR
quote:
VOR
How many Fauci Ouchies have you had by now. I’ll be shocked if you’re not in double digits
Posted on 9/24/26 at 11:36 pm to Ailsa
Maybe they can get the efficacy the creep up into a positive value this year.
That'd be sweet!
That'd be sweet!
Posted on 9/25/26 at 12:00 am to Ailsa
Well that only took 50 years
Posted on 9/25/26 at 5:09 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
thrilled with the RFK, Jr. pick by Trump.
The only part of this admin that has delivered everything as promised.
Posted on 9/25/26 at 6:41 am to Judnnc
quote:
Sorta like the shingles shot
The opposite from me. While it hurt like a bitch for a day after, I've not had anything symptomatic other than that since then.
Posted on 9/25/26 at 11:40 am to LegendInMyMind
quote:
Care to share a link for this? I'd like to read what was said.
https://joehoft.com/breaking-childrens-health-defense-hits-aap-with-rico-suit-over-fraudulent-vaccine-safety-claims/
RFK jr continued to fight big pharma for years to get them to admit it and finally won.
his website:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/
Posted on 9/25/26 at 11:48 am to jonnyanony
quote:
The other thing the FDA needs to do is actually crack down on the supplement industry. You can sell literal dog shite in a bottle, get a bunch of social media influencers to say it gives you superpowers and the FDA won't do damn thing.
There is a conflict of interest.

Posted on 9/25/26 at 11:51 am to IvoryBillMatt
RFK has been the best part of Trump 2.0

Popular
Back to top


1














