- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fani wins
Posted on 3/15/24 at 10:45 am to thejuiceisloose
Posted on 3/15/24 at 10:45 am to thejuiceisloose
quote:
Based on that posters feeling being hurt
You were one of them who constantly would post part of the transcript from the phone call that just got thrown out. You have no place in this conversation.
1
Posted on 3/15/24 at 10:46 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Much easier when you pay in cash.
not documentation.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 10:46 am to wfallstiger
[quote]The Judiciary is the most corrupt wing of our governance and has done more to undermine this nation than the other two branches combined.[quote]
The movie Devil's Advocate is spot on when Al Pacino (Satan) tells Keanu Reeves, if Satan is going to rule over his domain he will use the legal system to do so.......we're currently experiencing a two tier justice system that's being controlled by dark forces.
The movie Devil's Advocate is spot on when Al Pacino (Satan) tells Keanu Reeves, if Satan is going to rule over his domain he will use the legal system to do so.......we're currently experiencing a two tier justice system that's being controlled by dark forces.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 10:48 am to Jbird
quote:
Much easier when you pay in cash.
Easier, yes, but documentation can still be discovered to dispute this.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 10:50 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Yeah except that campaign cash in the mattress.
Easier, yes, but documentation can still be discovered to dispute this.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 10:50 am to SlowFlowPro
Guarantee a jury would disagree. The financial facts prove criminality. Bias apart, any clear minded person would conclude fraud and that they both knew what they were doing.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 10:53 am to riccoar
quote:
Guarantee a jury would disagree. The financial facts prove criminality. Bias apart, any clear minded person would conclude fraud and that they both knew what they were doing.
I think your point is fair, that under a criminal standard if the DA's office brought the charge and it got to a jury, you'd have a better chance at a conviction because...juries. But, it's all insinuation/circumstantial, at least as presented in this matter.
And in Fulton County, most likely not. At least not with these circumstances (it being a Trump centric claim). If it were just run of the mill public official corruption without those trappings, maybe.
This post was edited on 3/15/24 at 10:56 am
Posted on 3/15/24 at 10:53 am to TDTOM
quote:
You were one of them who constantly would post part of the transcript from the phone call that just got thrown out. You have no place in this conversation.
Found some more hurt feelingsPosted on 3/15/24 at 10:53 am to riccoar
quote:
Guarantee a jury would disagree.
With what, specifically?
quote:
Bias apart, any clear minded person would conclude fraud and that they both knew what they were doing.
A logical assumption, but not one based in evidence.
I believe this assumption could be effectively proven based on evidence, but the litigation prior to the hearing did not permit them either the time or avenues to secure this evidence.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 10:54 am to doya2
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:04 am to the808bass
quote:
Here’s a guy cheering on a prosecutor pursuing a political case and hiring her unqualified frickbuddy to give him hundreds of thousands
Glorious melt going on here. The comedy we’ll get from four more criminal trials.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:04 am to doya2
break out da Grey Goose queen, we gunna get dis white devil
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:06 am to Motownsix
All the lawfare lovers jumping for joy.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:11 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Her potential criminal liability for perjury has no bearing on the standards of the motion presented.
Should a D.A. that has perjured themselves in a court of law ever be able to prosecute another case? The judge should have kicked her out on that fact alone and then Wade for the impropriety of the relationship.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:11 am to Lg
quote:
Should a D.A. that has perjured themselves in a court of law ever be able to prosecute another case?
If she's convicted of perjury, she won't.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:14 am to TigerFan112
When he said he'd be back in two weeks with a verdict, it was because he was going to remove her. He could have done what he did today at that time otherwise.
That judge got a visit from the intelligence community.
We're no better than the soviets were with the KGB in charge. We'll be lucky to get out of this with as little damage as they did.
That judge got a visit from the intelligence community.
We're no better than the soviets were with the KGB in charge. We'll be lucky to get out of this with as little damage as they did.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:16 am to Captain Rumbeard
quote:
When he said he'd be back in two weeks with a verdict, it was because he was going to remove her. He could have done what he did today at that time otherwise.
That judge got a visit from the intelligence community.
Did they create a time machine to go back and change GA judicial precedents?
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:17 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:She'd have to first be charged. She won't be.
If she's convicted of perjury, she won't.
Our shite system is quite accustomed to not charging shite prosecutors for shite behavior.
It seems to be more comfortable to not hold friends and colleagues in the legal system to the standards expected of the rest of us.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:19 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If she's convicted of perjury, she won't.
Who brings the charge?
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:21 am to Lg
quote:
Who brings the charge?
I'm assuming it would have to either be feds (which would be more than perjury) or whatever GA's equivalent of the AG is.
In LA, the LA AG prosecutes DAs typically
Page 8 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News