- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Europe- “you’ll own nothing and be happy”
Posted on 8/31/26 at 6:53 pm to Mo Jeaux
Posted on 8/31/26 at 6:53 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
Putting funds into more effective investments than a low-yield savings account.
What if my plans for my $$ requires it to be readily accessible without everyone taking a fee if I withdraw it from some approved program 'early'?
Maybe it's in the bank for a short term while I decide what I am doing with it.
0
Posted on 8/31/26 at 6:56 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
You’re free to look up the details of these proposals.
Where are the proposals? The OP and others ragging on this haven't posted any details. Neither have you, SFP, or others that either support it or are doing the whole "BuT aKsHuAlLy" schtick.
quote:
Or, you could just eat up the bullshite rage bait in the OP.
Lacking details on what she's proposing, but being fairly familiar with how the EU has been operating since its formation (especially over the past ~10 years), I'm going to lean heavily towards there being frickery afoot. Europe taxes and regulates the shite out of their companies. If she were legitimately concerned about improving the economy, those would be the two main topics to address in her speech, not how much money people have saved up.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 7:11 pm to ronricks
quote:
Quit posting rage bait bullshite from Twitter on here.
Never.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 7:22 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
You’re free to look up the details of these proposals.
Why on flat Earth would anyone do that?
Posted on 8/31/26 at 7:23 pm to CleverUserName
quote:
What do you think these ""proposals"" they are talking about are?
I have said what they are twice, using the woman's own words. If you cannot read and comprehend, that is on you.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 7:34 pm to THRILLHO
quote:
Lacking details on what she's proposing
It is clear what she is proposing - she wants a EU wide "ERISA-qualified" investment system. She wants to give Europeans the choices that Americans have. Most European countries do not have the sort of investment vehicles that we have in the USA. That goes a long way in explaining why so much European assets sits in low-yield savings accounts. She also wants to liberalize how banks operate - again, copying the American model which promotes more domestic investment.
This is not some Maoist/Stalinist idea, it is a desire for Europe to look more like America. She is jealous in one sense, She sees how much more capital investment occurs in the USA. In fact, she hints at that when she talks about how too much investment money flows out of Europe (most definitely the bulk of that is to the USA).
Posted on 8/31/26 at 7:39 pm to Placekicker
None of the invaders have any savings.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 7:41 pm to Placekicker
Europeans are dumb enough to sign over every penny with a smile on their faces.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:10 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
Why on flat Earth would anyone do that?
Retards who enjoy their rage bait certainly wouldn’t.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:28 pm to JimEverett
quote:
It is clear what she is proposing - she wants a EU wide "ERISA-qualified" investment system.
The rest of your post MIGHT be accurate, but this is definitely incorrect. If her proposals were "clear", this would be a very different thread. No one on either "side" has provided specifics of what she's proposing, so definitely not clear.
quote:
She sees how much more capital investment occurs in the USA. In fact, she hints at that when she talks about how too much investment money flows out of Europe
The money that she's talking about in the video (sitting idly in EU banks) is not being invested in the US. And I think that "hints at" conflicts with your original statement that her proposals are "clear".
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:03 pm to Placekicker
Sing them songs while you drive them railroad spikes - BOY.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm shocked they didn't open this up with a video of savings accounts in cages
Ooh I’ll create this on Grok later
This post was edited on 8/31/26 at 9:12 pm
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Link?
Yeah because the EU is definitely concerned about the consent of the governed.
This post was edited on 8/31/26 at 9:17 pm
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Not shocking, this isn't as bad as the OP's post makes
Um. Looking at what you quoted looks pretty fricking bad
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I was going to make a similar comparison but it's not 1:1 and would confuse many.
quote:
SlowFlowPro
Your completely unwarranted arrogance (while being largely incorrect well over 50% of the time, might I add) regarding every single topic you’re involved in on this site is so tiresome.
You’re truly a cocksucker.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:45 pm to THRILLHO
quote:
No one on either "side" has provided specifics of what she's proposing, so definitely not clear.
You’re free to look them up of corse.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:47 pm to grizzlylongcut
quote:
Your completely unwarranted arrogance (while being largely incorrect well over 50% of the time, might I add) regarding every single topic you’re involved in on this site is so tiresome.
You’re truly a cocksucker.
You seem angry. SFP is correct here. The OP is rage bait bullshite.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:53 pm to grizzlylongcut
quote:
Yeah because the EU is definitely concerned about the consent of the governed.
That's not a link
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:54 pm to Placekicker
The Rothchilds wet dream.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:55 pm to grizzlylongcut
quote:
Your completely unwarranted arrogance (while being largely incorrect well over 50% of the time, might I add) r
quote:
You’re truly a cocksucker.
What a strange, hyper-emotional melt.
If you were smart and rational, you'd be pointing out the bullshite in OP, too.
You should be asking yourself which group (if not both) you're a part of to think that embarrassing post was a good idea.
quote:
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.
Page 6 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News