Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

EPA retaliating against Louisiana with 'Really strong' pollution reduction measure

Posted on 4/11/24 at 12:41 pm
Posted by frequent flyer
USA
Member since Jul 2021
2981 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 12:41 pm
Looks like it's going to target Louisiana specifically too. Apparently this is in retaliation for Louisiana filing a lawsuit against the EPA for demanding lower emissions in minority communities and investigating permits based on unquantifiable civil rights impacts.

The state of Louisiana not only had the nerve to challenge the EPA's over reach, but the EPA had to drop their Civil Rights investigations.

quote:


'Really strong' pollution reduction measure planned for Louisiana, EPA head says



The Advocate

PHILADELPHIA -- The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency plans to announce a major regulatory change aimed at reducing air emissions at chemical plants in the industrial corridor between Baton Rouge and New Orleans, the agency's administrator announced Friday.

“I’m excited to say that in the coming weeks, we’re going to announce a really strong regulation addressing those chemical plants in Cancer Alley," EPA Administrator Michael Regan told an audience of nearly 750 journalists, business trade activists and environmentalists at the Society of Environmental Journalists annual conference at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia.


quote:

Regan, who has visited Louisiana twice since taking office, did not explain what regulation or regulations he was referring to. The agency had announced four proposed regulations last year that would require reductions of emissions at more than 80 chemical plants, including many in Louisiana, such as the controversial Denka Performance Elastomers plant in St. John the Baptist Parish.


quote:

Regan's announcement came in response to a question from Bloomberg Law senior reporter Jennifer Hijazi, who was moderating his talk, about the status of several lawsuits filed by the Louisiana Attorney General's Office to block EPA regulations.

One of those suits, first filed by Gov. Jeff Landry when he was attorney general, challenged the EPA's use of civil rights regulations to require the state to enforce greater reductions in emissions in minority and low-income areas to correct past years of discrimination, even if unintentional.


quote:

The EPA dropped civil rights investigations into the state Departments of Health and Environmental Quality for their actions involving chemical plant permitting soon after that suit was filed last year.


The EPA delaying and setting up roadblocks like this could have a severe impact on job growth in the region. Industrial expansions would likely look elsewhere rather than get caught up in a political battle between a state hungry for new jobs and an EPA desperate to prevent job growth.
This post was edited on 4/11/24 at 12:42 pm
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
27102 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

Industrial expansions would likely look elsewhere rather than get caught up in a political battle between a state hungry for new jobs and an EPA desperate to prevent job growth.


Might but pretty much any expansion, anywhere is going to face EPA roadblocks... In many cases they are quietly passing regulations that are going to cripple everything... Past time they were reeled back in...
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25341 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:08 pm to
I guess the SCOTUS ruling in the West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency case didn't force the organization to be more effective under more strict guardrails.
Posted by Datbawwwww
Member since Oct 2023
182 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:35 pm to
No, for one of the first times in USA history, this administration just ignores the USSC! They have done so a few times including this “debt forgiveness” nonsense. SAD!!
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
10284 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:39 pm to
La take aim at this gov agency that has unbridled power that no American voter approved
Posted by LSUvet72
Member since Sep 2013
11849 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:54 pm to
Got enough of toxic polluters in La. .....

Hope this makes them stay away !
Posted by michael corleone
baton rouge
Member since Jun 2005
5807 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:56 pm to
Most of their regulations are unconstitutional.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118742 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

e U.S. Environmental Protection Agency plans to announce a major regulatory change aimed at reducing air emissions at chemical plants in the industrial corridor



quote:

Regan, who has visited Louisiana twice since taking office, did not explain what regulation or regulations he was referring to.
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
8586 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:59 pm to
C'mon SCOTUS. How soon can you overturn the CHEVRON DEFERENCE? We need to neuter these 3 letter agencies now!!
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118742 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:01 pm to
quote:


I guess the SCOTUS ruling in the West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency case didn't force the organization to be more effective under more strict guardrails.


This sounds like all bluster. First the EPA does not mention newly proposed rules. Second he targets Louisiana. That's unconsitutional... equal protection and all.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67783 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:01 pm to
We all want a government that makes policy based on vengeance instead of what helps its citizens thrive.

Don't we folks.
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
58117 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

toxic polluters


Define a toxic polluter
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26189 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

Define a toxic polluter

That's them evil plants with all that cloudy white shite comping out of those big poles.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26189 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:28 pm to
This rule as represented in the article has no chance of being enacted.
Posted by back9Tiger
Mandeville, LA.
Member since Nov 2005
14143 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

Might but pretty much any expansion, anywhere is going to face EPA roadblocks... In many cases they are quietly passing regulations that are going to cripple everything... Past time they were reeled back in...


Vote the right way in November (R), and this activism overreach gets reeled in.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram