- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: E Jean Carroll under criminal investigation
Posted on 5/27/26 at 9:54 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 5/27/26 at 9:54 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Help me understand something here.
So this woman is claiming that she was at a department store in the middle of the day in NYC and Donald Trump (during his prime years) barged into her dressing room and started raping her. He just pulled his ding dong out and went to town on here int he middle of the day at a department store.
I don't even think Hunter Biden would have done something like that.
I hope he sues the living shite out of this woman
So this woman is claiming that she was at a department store in the middle of the day in NYC and Donald Trump (during his prime years) barged into her dressing room and started raping her. He just pulled his ding dong out and went to town on here int he middle of the day at a department store.
I don't even think Hunter Biden would have done something like that.
I hope he sues the living shite out of this woman
This post was edited on 5/27/26 at 9:55 pm
0
Posted on 5/27/26 at 9:55 pm to Speckhunter2012
quote:
Link?
No new wars
Reducing cost of living
Reducing inflation
Decreasing debt
H2B visas
Bending the knee to China, allowing half a MILLION Chinese spies into the country
Tarrifs
Building the wall
Want me to go on?
Posted on 5/27/26 at 9:56 pm to hubertcumberdale
Well, you have an amazing new President to vote for in 2028. Kamala Harris will treat you and the entire country with grace
Posted on 5/27/26 at 9:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
confirmed TDS
He's correct
You called Trump a convicted rapist and got factually corrected after trying to spread fake news.
As a lawyer , that's not an innocent mistake
Took off your mask and got busted
Posted on 5/27/26 at 9:58 pm to hubertcumberdale
quote:
No new wars Reducing cost of living Reducing inflation Decreasing debt H2B visas Bending the knee to China, allowing half a MILLION Chinese spies into the country Tarrifs Building the wall Want me to go on?
Sure
I do. Then we will talk about the 5 trillion
in Govt. fraud under Biden
I look forward to it. Do you really think all
of that shite ain’t gonna be exposed?
Bless your heart.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 9:59 pm to beachdude
quote:
What everyone is not talking about is the way this lawsuit was handled by defense counsel. The burden of proof in a civil case is on the plaintiff just as it is on a state prosecutor in a criminal trial. However, in a civil matter it is not guilt beyond a reasonable doubt as in a criminal prosecution, but it is proof by a preponderance of the evidence. The jury weighs the testimony, evidence, the demeanor of the witnesses, the arguments of counsel and the instructions of the judge in reaching its verdict supported by a “preponderance” (in their subjective view) of the evidence. In this case, Carroll’s testimony, the testimony of her two friends that she told of the attack contemporaneous with the alleged event, and other evidence submitted went unrebutted by defense counsel’s case presentation except to let her client claim the plaintiff was a lunatic and not his type. Zero countervailing evidence. Frankly, given the trial court record, the standards for appellate review and the tarnished record of defense counsel, I do not see this case getting reversed. There’s a possibility that the quantum award for damages may be reduced, but most of that is a separate award for defamation after the trial on sexual assault.
It’s a lot simpler than all of this. They were always going to find trump liable.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 10:00 pm to G2160
quote:
It’s a lot simpler than all of this. They were always going to find trump liable.
This is what they talk circles around
They are corrupt and they can not admit it
Posted on 5/27/26 at 10:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
wut
Exactly the response we have come to expect from the principled TD attorney.
You know what happened and we know what happened. If you cannot admit what happened then shame on you and your integrity.
That clear it up?
Posted on 5/27/26 at 10:01 pm to Speckhunter2012
quote:
Exactly the response we have come to expect from the principled TD attorney.
It's a go to response for when people make shite up, yes.
quote:
You know what happened and we know what happened.
No, I don't know it happened. Not how you described.
quote:
If you cannot admit what happened then shame on you and your integrity.
Post your proof.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 10:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Post your proof.
You are a goofy lying bastard.
LOL
Slo Flo Pro Snow
This post was edited on 5/27/26 at 10:12 pm
Posted on 5/27/26 at 10:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
It never ceases to amaze me how you can act like you don’t know things that every sane person knows. That’s how I know you’re a democrat. And in two months you’ll say you never said what you said. You’re a sad little man
Posted on 5/27/26 at 10:32 pm to bamadontcare
quote:
Your sides DOJ broke the law
side
Posted on 5/27/26 at 10:34 pm to Sweep Da Leg
quote:
It never ceases to amaze me how you can act like you don’t know things that every sane person knows.
This sounds particularly like the "Common sense" crutch people fall back onto when they can't rely or facts or logic, or, most commonly, their "facts" are proven false. A great example is the "crime is so bad today" arguments from people who grew up during Hell on Earth in America (1975-1995) and think it was safe then.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 10:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
She seemed to have some type of mental illness and was used to charge Trump with something. Nothing made sense about that case.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 10:41 pm to G2160
quote:
They were always going to find Trump liable.
That, of course, may very well be true. However, a good aggressive defense that involved something other than name calling might have benefited him through the appellate system. It was self-inflicted and he should have hired a smart Wall Street insurance defense attorney instead of a chick with nice tits and a flexible attitude to ethics in the practice of law and no idea how to defend this type of lawsuit.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 10:42 pm to TigerNlc
quote:
Nothing made sense about that case.
It was terribly odd... even her "supporters" in interviews were visibly uncomfortable with her.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 10:49 pm to SallysHuman
The only fingering done to her is by the DOJ!
Page 8 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News