Started By
Message

re: Drug ads on television must end now. Some drugs have more side effects than cigarettes.

Posted on 12/9/24 at 12:16 pm to
Posted by cadillacattack
the ATL
Member since May 2020
10797 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 12:16 pm to

Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
23240 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:01 pm to
I see you love Saul Alinsky, especially the chapter on PROJECTION!!
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

I see you love Saul Alinsky


Saul would love your nanny state.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:03 pm to
No idea why there are drug ads at all. But the side effect profile of specific drugs are not why they should be banned. Smoking is far worse for you than these drugs.
Posted by Barbados
Member since Nov 2024
2089 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

How about being a free country with less government control? Why should government limit ads for a legal product?



Than all drugs should be legal without script
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:04 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/11/26 at 7:41 pm
Posted by beauchristopher
Member since Jan 2008
73763 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:04 pm to
Please correct me, but I think I heard only two countries advertise drugs like we do?
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
23240 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:05 pm to
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:06 pm to
quote:


Than all drugs should be legal without script


Agree.

I had to pay $550 for a doctor visit for my granddaughter (before insurance kicked in) and we all knew what it was, and what she needs.

To get a script I had to pay $550 for a doctors visit, to get a script that cost $7.

Its a fricking racket.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
35932 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

Agree. I had to pay $550 for a doctor visit for my granddaughter (before insurance kicked in) and we all knew what it was, and what she needs. To get a script I had to pay $550 for a doctors visit, to get a script that cost $7. Its a fricking racket.


Eye doctor is the same thing. Your eyeglasses prescription is only good for a year. So if you break your glasses and want to get a new pair you have to go get a new exam, ect.
I know you can buy them from China with an old script but that doesn’t change the fact it’s a scam.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:10 pm to
quote:


Eye doctor is the same thing. Your eyeglasses prescription is only good for a year. So if you break your glasses and want to get a new pair you have to go get a new exam, ect.
I know you can buy them from China with an old script but that doesn’t change the fact it’s a scam.


Yep, Our laws are to protect the profession, not the people.

$550 to get an antibiotic that we knew we needed prior to the visit. Its a horrible system.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
35932 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

Yep, Our laws are to protect the profession, not the people. $550 to get an antibiotic that we knew we needed prior to the visit. Its a horrible system.


100%. Doesn’t make socialized medicine the de facto solution but our current system is untenable.
Posted by LaBoyNTn
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2005
729 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:14 pm to
Hell yes! Especially the ones showin 2 guys kisdin
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
79993 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

 for profit
Oh no! For profit! Those bastards.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
79993 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

I'm not 100% in disagreement, but limiting speech and an entities ability to advertise just feels so...liberal.

That used to be a much bigger problem on this board. Oh well.
This board is headed hard left.
Posted by Wolfwireless
Member since Aug 2024
4783 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

I'm not 100% in disagreement, but limiting speech and an entities ability to advertise just feels so...liberal.

That used to be a much bigger problem on this board. Oh well.

Big pharma and the medical industry aren't the friends of the public anymore
Really haven't been for at least half of my life.

The ban on tobacco advertising proves that things proven to be harmful can be restricted from advertising. So with this precedent, "medicines" that can lead to life threatening, and life ending, or cancer, fall into this same category as harmful, right?
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
79993 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

So with this precedent, "medicines" that can lead to life threatening, and life ending, or cancer, fall into this same category as harmful, right?
You can't buy them over the counter like cigarettes. And, nobody who doesn't have ulcerative colitis is popping into their primary care doc and asking for that med. The ads are just made to get annoying patients with the particular condition to make demands of their docs. I'd bet 90% of doctors would prefer to see med advertising stopped.
Posted by Von
Wichita Falls, TX
Member since Feb 2019
2667 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

But if the media isn't paid off they may be motivated to investigate all the crimes in the drug companies.

Underrated post.

As others have said, the advertising dollars are to control the media.
The subliminal effects on viewers is a bonus.

Has anyone bothered to look up why pharma advertising was banned in the first place?


The comparison to cigs is interesting.
Remember the anti smoking commercial with the "scientist" in front of the blackboard listing all of the poisons in cigarettes? I haven't seen that one in ages.
I think they pulled those because too many people were asking why fines and taxes were all that was being done about it.
You can bitch about evil tobacco companies bribing government to stay in business for only so long, eventually you have to acknowledge... Government took those bribes.. AND the fines.. AND increased taxes.. AND let it continue.
Who is worse? The companies or the government?
Posted by Bayou nights
Nashville
Member since Aug 2019
955 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:30 pm to
Is it true that we are one of only a few countries that allow drug ads on tv or is that false? I never found a solid answer on this.
Posted by Wolfwireless
Member since Aug 2024
4783 posts
Posted on 12/9/24 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

quote:
Why does pharma need to advertise drugs to people when only doctors can prescribe them?


"Why do you need an AR15 to hunt?"

Now, now Roger, behave
That's a "loaded" question
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram