Started By
Message

re: Dozens of missing children,some as young as just one year old rescued from sex traffickers

Posted on 12/21/25 at 2:00 pm to
Posted by somethingdifferent
Member since Aug 2024
1940 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

Because you were clearly dropped on your head as an infant
Your transition surgery being botched doesn't mean you have to lash out against us. K?
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
12058 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

well my comments were about the CSA. The Satanism stuff doesn't really exist, you're right in me saying that.


Michael Aquino says hello from beyond the grave.
Posted by somethingdifferent
Member since Aug 2024
1940 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

Nothing else needs to be said about your unhinged status if you post malarkey like that
I noticed you didn't point out anything I said that's wrong. Well there's a surprise.

You have nothing. You bring nothing to the table.
Posted by RelentlessAnalysis
AggieHank Alter
Member since Oct 2025
2968 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

SFP, I say this in the strongest terms possible, you have no freaking clue how much it occurs and you commenting on people's utter pain and despair this way shows how sick and twisted you are This topic brings out the worst of you and I pray that you have a serious change of heart on this matter.
This sort of comment comes from an emotional child.

Discussing the EXTENT (or lack thereof) of a given issue/problem does NOTHING to minimize the pain of those who DO experience it.

Saying that meteor strikes upon residential neighborhoods are very rare … does not mean that one lacks empathy for that ONE neighborhood that got hit.
Posted by somethingdifferent
Member since Aug 2024
1940 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

Odd how you complain about other posters not responding to you when you do the same thing
Show me when i did this. You just said I was "obsessive" so which is it?

quote:

why did you stop posting as bfniii?
Is this supposed to mean something? Do you have a point?
Posted by RelentlessAnalysis
AggieHank Alter
Member since Oct 2025
2968 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

(SFP) is known to regularly carry water for both satanists and pedophiles by trying to downplay both things as something we shouldn't worry about because they don't exist.
You think there is a pedo or a satanist under every bush … while he acknowledges they exist, with maybe a few of each in the entire forest.

Statistics support HIS view.
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
38072 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

I only ask because I've seen an article here and there on whacked out parents selling or trading their children to feed their drug habits.

Poor kids.

I watched a video about young mothers trading off a little girl or two to the cartels in exchange for the cartel networks getting them safely onto American soil during the Biden administration before the basically "open border" policies kicked in. And then, allegedly, the demand for these kids grew so much that the cartels would only guarantee safe passage through their turf into America if either a cash payment or "other trade" could be made.

Now I tried to verify this and couldn't, though there's definitely a LOT of smoke around it. But the allegations are that the cartels wanted kids to traffick as play toys so they offered safe passage and protection in exchange for a kid. And when it became easier to just seek asylum after crossing the border illegally, the cartels demanded "payment" just to allow these migrants through their territory without being killed.

Again, I haven't been able to verify this, but it stuck with me and makes me sick. Either way, it's all out there for all to see, how low mankind can plumb into the depths of depravity. We are a broken species.

Judgement is coming for us all. We 100% deserve the hell that will fall upon us all, for not only our actions but also for our inactions.



...this begs a question. How "good" are we, when we allow this because we are so comfortable in our existences and we don't want to risk losing our cushy lifestyles? IMO, it makes us equally responsible. Innocent kids suffer while we offer thoughts and prayers. I thank GOD for the good people in the agencies that are actively fighting for these kids. And I am ashamed that I feel positioned where I can have absolutely no effect.
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
10716 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

Statistics support HIS view.


You should be able to post them so that the source can be evaluated.
Posted by This GUN for HIRE
Member since May 2022
6089 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

Your transition surgery being botched doesn't mean you have to lash out against us


Transitioning from a dumbass to a bigger dumbass, I don't think they botched it.
Posted by Ham Malone
Member since Nov 2010
2700 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 2:18 pm to
It’s a genuine question, were you banned? Did you want to earn the reputation as a stalking insane poster for a second time?
Posted by somethingdifferent
Member since Aug 2024
1940 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

Look no further than this very thread
You proved nothing. You failed to read people's minds to know how much they think it's happening and your citations didn't prove that trafficking is less than what people think
Posted by somethingdifferent
Member since Aug 2024
1940 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

It's not. Look at the data
Genius, the false dichotomy is in saying that parents EITHER have to watch their kids OR be "concerned about strangers." I realize this is going to be beyond your comprehension but parents can actually accommodate both in their parenting.

And your "data" is not proving your point at all
Posted by somethingdifferent
Member since Aug 2024
1940 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 4:14 pm to
quote:

This sort of comment comes from an emotional child
I always ask buffoons like you to point out what I said that's wrong. It basically never happens.

quote:

Discussing the EXTENT (or lack thereof) of a given issue/problem does NOTHING to minimize the pain of those who DO experience it
The normal people ITT are asking why would anyone downplay human trafficking. That is absurd and inhuman. Moreover, SFP acts impartial and like facts are on SFP's side and then condescends to everyone else even though none of that is the case
Posted by Clark14
Earth
Member since Dec 2014
27162 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 4:41 pm to
Quote from U.S Marshall’s web site..



The Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act of 2015 enhanced the USMS discretionary authority to assist other law enforcement agencies with the recovery of missing, endangered or abducted children, regardless of whether a fugitive or sex offender was involved. The U.S. Marshals have a Missing Child Unit to oversee and manage the implementation of its enhanced authority under the act.

Upon request, the Marshals assist other law enforcement agencies with the recovery of “critically missing children,” who have gone missing under circumstances that indicate an elevated risk to the child. Since 2015, when the Marshals received enhanced authority under the act, the agency has located or recovered more than 3,967 missing children. The U.S. Marshals have located or recovered missing children in 66 percent of cases received. Of those recovered, 61 percent were found within seven days. The U.S. Marshals are leading the way in a nationwide effort to rescue and recover missing and exploited children, thereby aiding in the prevention of human trafficking.



This is not a new search mission and this one found children in other states as well. Thanks to the Marshals for doing these searches. Many look like child custody issues so a parent or relative is involved.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477254 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

Genius, the false dichotomy is in saying that parents EITHER have to watch their kids OR be "concerned about strangers."


Parents have limited resources. Based on the data, they should devote very little to "stranger danger" as the real threat comes from family and associates

This is about diverting resources proportionate to the risk.

Almost all of the resources of parents concerned about CSA of their children should be focused on family and associates of the family.

quote:

And your "data" is not proving your point at all


I'm not shocked you can't interpret clear data
This post was edited on 12/21/25 at 4:46 pm
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47628 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

SloFlowPro



Posted by Kjnstkmn
Vermilion Parish
Member since Aug 2020
21933 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 4:57 pm to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477254 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 5:16 pm to
Posted by somethingdifferent
Member since Aug 2024
1940 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

Statistics support HIS view
Prove it. Lay out the case that trafficking doesn't happen as often as people think it does. This will be a hoot
Posted by RelentlessAnalysis
AggieHank Alter
Member since Oct 2025
2968 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 5:27 pm to
quote:

Statistics support HIS viewProve it. Lay out the case that trafficking doesn't happen as often as people think it does. This will be a hoot
Why bother?

SFP has done that a dozen times, and y’all discount facts in favor of feels.
Jump to page
Page First 7 8 9 10 11 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram