- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/12/21 at 12:32 pm to I B Freeman
I dought they’re that stupid
Posted on 8/12/21 at 12:38 pm to LSUvet72
quote:
be proved that the election was the biggest RICO fraud ever perpetuated in America.
Posted on 8/12/21 at 12:38 pm to Gifman
and the opinion of any other people that see it.
It is just my opinion if MSU gave you a diploma then a diploma from there is not worth much.
It is just my opinion if MSU gave you a diploma then a diploma from there is not worth much.
Posted on 8/12/21 at 12:38 pm to I B Freeman
quote:
exactly
She and the other defendants may well have taken advantage of the emotions of the Trumpkins.
Very possibly, Tucker pointed that out and got pounded on by this forum for doing so.
Lots of people here were certainly huffing on hopium.
Posted on 8/12/21 at 12:40 pm to I B Freeman
quote:
I B Freeman
quote:
It's Politico
Of course it is. IB REEEEEEEEEman, doing work!!!
Posted on 8/12/21 at 12:45 pm to Jack Carter
quote:
They were all complaining about dominion voting machines for years leading up to the 2020 elections. Democrats were giving speeches in the capitol warning of voter fraud using the likes of dominion machines. In 2019 they were sounding the alarms during the democrat primaries.
Now they defend Dominion, because they used these machines to help steal the 2020 presidential election
This has gone on for years...they speak out of their arse for whatever fits their narrative at a given time then flip on a dime, relying on the media to hoodwink the public and the low info voter's short memory spans.
Go back to 1997, the Dems were going apoplectic over the threat of Saddam's WMDs when Clinton was POTUS and "taking action" against him. Then they acted like they never said the things that are in the freaking Congressional record from a few years before when they were prancing around with the "Bush lied about WMD" crap.
Oh but we could find many other examples of their phony duplicity...look at their outrage over impeachment over Clinton. They threw every bit of shade out they could about it being unfair and over sex, blah blah but then craft an absolutely absurd impeachment against Trump when he broke NO laws unlike Clinton. The Dems went against every argument they had previously conjured up about fairness in the process.
The lack of dignity and standards they have is very hard to push back against as well because good and decent folks don't understand their language and tactics, nor their brazen disregard for common decency. It is very easy for them to take advantage of the situation over this as well. Which they gladly do as long as it gets them power!
Posted on 8/12/21 at 12:47 pm to BusterW
quote:
I dought they’re that stupid
Posted on 8/12/21 at 12:48 pm to I B Freeman
quote:
May have. You can sue them and find out.
Fortunately we don't have to. That will come up in discovery
Posted on 8/12/21 at 12:59 pm to LSUvet72
quote:
Pretty sure the longer the suit goes on it will be proved that the election was the biggest RICO fraud ever perpetuated in America
Based off of what? It’s been one L on top of another for Trump since November.There’s been NOTHING to prove the election was rigged. Why is it going to change now?
Posted on 8/12/21 at 1:04 pm to I B Freeman
quote:
Instead of saying they can back up all the crap they said they have elected to say it doesn't matter if it is lies.
Kinda sounds like 5 years of CNN, NBC, ABC, New York Times, Washington Post.....
Posted on 8/12/21 at 1:24 pm to idlewatcher
Let me get this straight. You expect the defense to introduce something during discovery to prove they were not lying YET their initial defense was "it does not matter if we were lying".
Don't you think if they had the goods they would welcome the opportunity for trial instead of trying to stop it???
Don't you think if they had the goods they would welcome the opportunity for trial instead of trying to stop it???
Posted on 8/12/21 at 1:28 pm to TigerB8
Yes it does. These Trump people appear no better than the media.
Sounds to me like their defense just fell off a cliff.
Sounds to me like their defense just fell off a cliff.
Posted on 8/12/21 at 1:30 pm to I B Freeman
You certainly do not understand the legal process so now that you are shown once again to be an idiot, perhaps you can sit back, shut up and learn
Somehow I doubt you will... idiots never learn.
Somehow I doubt you will... idiots never learn.
Posted on 8/12/21 at 1:32 pm to dafif
Tell us about the legal process dafif.
Posted on 8/12/21 at 1:33 pm to I B Freeman
Well, for starters, they are at the pleadings stage. Do you understand that???
Posted on 8/12/21 at 1:46 pm to I B Freeman
quote:
Let me get this straight. You expect the defense to introduce something during discovery to prove they were not lying YET their initial defense was "it does not matter if we were lying".
This could be possible. At present, the defense has presented a motion to dismiss. For that to succeed, they have to presume that everything the plaintiffs state is true, and if it is true, they still can't win under law. That doesn't preclude them from later contesting the accuracy of the plaintiffs claims, or making a defense that what they state is true. Those would be questions of fact that would be decided at the trial stage.
Right now, they are saying, "Even if I lied, I have a right to lie because this is politics." Judge is saying No to that point.
More to your underlying point though, the defense also seemed to best stating during oral arguments that "its hyperbole" and having the judge try to rule that "no reasonable person would believe [Powell's] claim" Similar to if I said, "Your talking out of your arse" Nobody would believe that literally. That's going to be tougher to walk back from.
This post was edited on 8/12/21 at 9:11 pm
Posted on 8/12/21 at 1:48 pm to Jbird
quote:
Muh standing!
Muh Pillow now has standing to conduct discovery. If they just were interested in the truth coming out, then they should not have even presented the Motion to Dismiss. They should have welcomed a full trial and full discovery.
Popular
Back to top


1






