Started By
Message

re: Dominion lawsuits against Powell, Lindell and Rudy move ahead---this should be interesting

Posted on 8/12/21 at 12:30 pm to
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 8/12/21 at 12:30 pm to
Gif---has it ever dawned on you that your post quality reflects poorly on MSU given your avatar?
Posted by BusterW
LA.
Member since Jul 2021
307 posts
Posted on 8/12/21 at 12:32 pm to
I dought they’re that stupid
Posted by Gifman
Member since Jan 2021
16975 posts
Posted on 8/12/21 at 12:34 pm to
Posted by skinny domino
sebr
Member since Feb 2007
14493 posts
Posted on 8/12/21 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

be proved that the election was the biggest RICO fraud ever perpetuated in America.
:rotflmao:
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 8/12/21 at 12:38 pm to
and the opinion of any other people that see it.

It is just my opinion if MSU gave you a diploma then a diploma from there is not worth much.
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
26871 posts
Posted on 8/12/21 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

exactly

She and the other defendants may well have taken advantage of the emotions of the Trumpkins.



Very possibly, Tucker pointed that out and got pounded on by this forum for doing so.

Lots of people here were certainly huffing on hopium.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
56756 posts
Posted on 8/12/21 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

I B Freeman



quote:

It's Politico


Of course it is. IB REEEEEEEEEman, doing work!!!
Posted by Gifman
Member since Jan 2021
16975 posts
Posted on 8/12/21 at 12:43 pm to
Posted by Crimson1st
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2010
20684 posts
Posted on 8/12/21 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

They were all complaining about dominion voting machines for years leading up to the 2020 elections. Democrats were giving speeches in the capitol warning of voter fraud using the likes of dominion machines. In 2019 they were sounding the alarms during the democrat primaries.

Now they defend Dominion, because they used these machines to help steal the 2020 presidential election


This has gone on for years...they speak out of their arse for whatever fits their narrative at a given time then flip on a dime, relying on the media to hoodwink the public and the low info voter's short memory spans.

Go back to 1997, the Dems were going apoplectic over the threat of Saddam's WMDs when Clinton was POTUS and "taking action" against him. Then they acted like they never said the things that are in the freaking Congressional record from a few years before when they were prancing around with the "Bush lied about WMD" crap.

Oh but we could find many other examples of their phony duplicity...look at their outrage over impeachment over Clinton. They threw every bit of shade out they could about it being unfair and over sex, blah blah but then craft an absolutely absurd impeachment against Trump when he broke NO laws unlike Clinton. The Dems went against every argument they had previously conjured up about fairness in the process.

The lack of dignity and standards they have is very hard to push back against as well because good and decent folks don't understand their language and tactics, nor their brazen disregard for common decency. It is very easy for them to take advantage of the situation over this as well. Which they gladly do as long as it gets them power!
Posted by BayouBlitz
Member since Aug 2007
18126 posts
Posted on 8/12/21 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

I dought they’re that stupid



Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
92046 posts
Posted on 8/12/21 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

May have. You can sue them and find out.


Fortunately we don't have to. That will come up in discovery
Posted by NuggLife
Member since Apr 2021
90 posts
Posted on 8/12/21 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

Pretty sure the longer the suit goes on it will be proved that the election was the biggest RICO fraud ever perpetuated in America


Based off of what? It’s been one L on top of another for Trump since November.There’s been NOTHING to prove the election was rigged. Why is it going to change now?
Posted by TigerB8
End Communism
Member since Oct 2003
10849 posts
Posted on 8/12/21 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

Instead of saying they can back up all the crap they said they have elected to say it doesn't matter if it is lies.


Kinda sounds like 5 years of CNN, NBC, ABC, New York Times, Washington Post.....
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 8/12/21 at 1:24 pm to
Let me get this straight. You expect the defense to introduce something during discovery to prove they were not lying YET their initial defense was "it does not matter if we were lying".

Don't you think if they had the goods they would welcome the opportunity for trial instead of trying to stop it???
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 8/12/21 at 1:28 pm to
Yes it does. These Trump people appear no better than the media.

Sounds to me like their defense just fell off a cliff.
Posted by dafif
Member since Jan 2019
7846 posts
Posted on 8/12/21 at 1:30 pm to
You certainly do not understand the legal process so now that you are shown once again to be an idiot, perhaps you can sit back, shut up and learn

Somehow I doubt you will... idiots never learn.
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 8/12/21 at 1:32 pm to
Tell us about the legal process dafif.

Posted by dafif
Member since Jan 2019
7846 posts
Posted on 8/12/21 at 1:33 pm to
Well, for starters, they are at the pleadings stage. Do you understand that???
Posted by dukkbill
Member since Aug 2012
1011 posts
Posted on 8/12/21 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

Let me get this straight. You expect the defense to introduce something during discovery to prove they were not lying YET their initial defense was "it does not matter if we were lying".


This could be possible. At present, the defense has presented a motion to dismiss. For that to succeed, they have to presume that everything the plaintiffs state is true, and if it is true, they still can't win under law. That doesn't preclude them from later contesting the accuracy of the plaintiffs claims, or making a defense that what they state is true. Those would be questions of fact that would be decided at the trial stage.

Right now, they are saying, "Even if I lied, I have a right to lie because this is politics." Judge is saying No to that point.

More to your underlying point though, the defense also seemed to best stating during oral arguments that "its hyperbole" and having the judge try to rule that "no reasonable person would believe [Powell's] claim" Similar to if I said, "Your talking out of your arse" Nobody would believe that literally. That's going to be tougher to walk back from.
This post was edited on 8/12/21 at 9:11 pm
Posted by dukkbill
Member since Aug 2012
1011 posts
Posted on 8/12/21 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

Muh standing!


Muh Pillow now has standing to conduct discovery. If they just were interested in the truth coming out, then they should not have even presented the Motion to Dismiss. They should have welcomed a full trial and full discovery.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram