- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Doge savings of 160 billion will cost at least 135 billion to effectuate
Posted on 4/27/25 at 12:13 am to PsychTiger
Posted on 4/27/25 at 12:13 am to PsychTiger
quote:
So, it still saves us billions this year and even more every year going forward.
Going around firing people willy nilly will never make a meaningful change in the deficit.
0
Posted on 4/27/25 at 12:30 am to Eurocat
quote:
But that effort may also
It also might not...
/thread
Posted on 4/27/25 at 2:08 am to Eurocat
Hey IDIOT OP
Now calculate the LONG TERM SAVIBGS YOU MORON!
And when your done, GFY sideways and of course, you will like it!
Now calculate the LONG TERM SAVIBGS YOU MORON!
And when your done, GFY sideways and of course, you will like it!
Posted on 4/27/25 at 3:28 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
quote:
analysis from a nonpartisan research and advocacy group
Also "non profit" and an NGO.....
I always loved the non partisan/bi partisan wording, it just means I bribed a couple of folks from the other side to agree with us.
Posted on 4/27/25 at 3:29 am to PsychTiger
quote:
So, it still saves us billions this year and even more every year going forward.
Correct, most of the costs listed are one time expenses the first year.
What shoddy work though.... "costs of reduced collection on taxes". So I take the number of people at the IRS, taxes in total collected, come up with a per person collection, and if I cut 1000 heads the taxes paid go with it? How about I am streamlining the process so there will probably be less people slipping through the cracks?
Probably the same people who did the James Webb telescope that was 14 years late and nearly 10 times the projected costs.
This post was edited on 4/27/25 at 3:36 am
Posted on 4/27/25 at 5:18 am to Eurocat
quote:Interesting "analysis"
The analysis seeks to tally the costs associated with putting tens of thousands of federal employees on paid leave
If the premise is a workforce is twice the necessary size to accomplish a task, and half the group is placed on paid leave to test the premise, not only does that test not "cost" 1¢, it sets the table for massive recurring annual cost savings in the future.
Posted on 4/27/25 at 6:08 am to Eurocat
quote:
with a new analysis from a nonpartisan research and advocacy group
sure, Jan.
Posted on 4/27/25 at 7:06 am to FnTigers
Well is yahoo news. And
Notice they never have any real sauces. Who is this independent adjudicator?
quote:
with a new analysis from a nonpartisan research and advocacy group estimating that DOGE's actions will cost $135 billion this fiscal year
Notice they never have any real sauces. Who is this independent adjudicator?
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News