Started By
Message

re: Doesn’t look good for Trump

Posted on 11/14/19 at 9:52 pm to
Posted by thebigmuffaletta
Member since Aug 2017
12940 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 9:52 pm to
Funny how these 'Drumph is finished' threads always surface immediately after another democrat hoax crumbles apart.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
46121 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 9:53 pm to
I’m just a down voter, have no idea what you’re rambling about this evening.....I just know it’s absolute drivel crying out for my down vote smash!
Posted by jimdog
columbus, ga
Member since Dec 2012
6636 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 9:53 pm to
What looks good is Trump faithfully obeying his oath of upholding the law. The only way any of this is a crime is if he had attempted to get the leader of Ukraine to falsify evidence. He asked for the truth. To either clear or bring to justice those responsible. If finally having an outsider in office who obeys his oath of office makes him more popular with voters then well done sir.
Posted by Richleau
Member since Dec 2018
2389 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 9:54 pm to
Are you going to collect them in your bag of who gives a frick?

You're wrong. End of story. There was no Quid pro quo. Do you think Zelensky or any other Ukranian official are lying when they are saying the same thing? Was the investigation into Burisma picked up and continued? Nope.

Obama gave them blankets while thousands of Ukranians were dying fighting russian tanks. Trump gave them the missiles needed to combat russian tanks. Yet you probably still believe Trump is a Russian asset.
This post was edited on 11/14/19 at 9:55 pm
Posted by Lsudx256
DFW
Member since Mar 2016
2911 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 9:54 pm to
Even your name shows what a loser you are.
Posted by LSU Fan SLU Grad
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2006
4893 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 9:55 pm to
quote:

I assume you’re ignorant of the fact that not a single “witness” has testified of their first hand witnessing what you claim.


Vindman was listening to the call. And he testified. Am I incorrect?
This post was edited on 11/14/19 at 9:57 pm
Posted by weptiger
Georgia
Member since Feb 2007
10341 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 9:55 pm to
Will theorize that you must like to watch your old lady having relations with other men. That statement has about as much fact and credibility as your OP.
Posted by Richleau
Member since Dec 2018
2389 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 9:56 pm to
And everything that gave Vindham pause didn't come to fruition. So again, if money wasn't exchanged for anything and no action was taken by Zelensky to look into the Bidens, what are you even on about?
Posted by LSU Fan SLU Grad
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2006
4893 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 9:57 pm to
Move the goal posts some more why don’t you.
Posted by Mkay 84
Member since Apr 2018
506 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 9:57 pm to
Posted by LSU Tiger Bob
South
Member since Sep 2011
3002 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 9:58 pm to
quote:

LSU Fan SLU Grad


Do you swallow too??
Posted by DreauxB2015
Member since Nov 2015
7724 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 9:59 pm to
Posted by LSU Fan SLU Grad
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2006
4893 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 9:59 pm to
I’d like to know who’s responsible for my 5 upvotes.
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
22780 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 10:01 pm to
Why all the downvotes? That is some funny shite!
Posted by thebigmuffaletta
Member since Aug 2017
12940 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 10:04 pm to
quote:

I’d like to know who’s responsible for my 5 upvotes.


Your alters?
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
35038 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 10:04 pm to
I notice your questions haven’t been answered yet and it’s been 5 pages.

Quite telling.
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
99042 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 10:05 pm to
Damn, a degree from SLU must be essentially worthless.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
47885 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 10:06 pm to
Yes vindman testified that there was no quid pro quo. None of the star witnesses have corroborated that accusation so the Dims have changed the charge. The talking points have been changed didnt you get the memo?
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 10:09 pm to
quote:

Vindman was listening to the call. And he testified. Am I incorrect?
He said he didn’t hear any quid pro quo, which was your original claim.

So, as I said, no one who was an eye witness has said there was a quid pro quo exchange. The only persons who’ve claimed it was testified via hearsay claims.
Posted by fischd1
Mandeville
Member since Dec 2007
2827 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 10:10 pm to
Name one impeachable offense please.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram