- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/12/24 at 9:35 am to GumboPot
quote:
Occam's Razor.
This would appear to be its only application for you on this entire thing.
Posted on 9/12/24 at 9:38 am to Flats
quote:
This would appear to be its only application for you on this entire thing.
And the free fall nature of Building 7.
Posted on 9/12/24 at 9:48 am to GumboPot
quote:
Ask yourself this question; why are building demolition contractors wasting time strategically placing detonation charges on buildings for demolition when they can just start an office fire with office furniture and printing paper to bring buildings down in a free fall collapse?
Sorry for being mean, but I think this is fricking dumb.
Posted on 9/12/24 at 9:49 am to lake chuck fan
Um why wouldn’t they just steal the evidence instead is destroying the entire building? Again, dumb.
This post was edited on 9/12/24 at 9:50 am
Posted on 9/12/24 at 10:01 am to baybeefeetz
quote:quote:
Ask yourself this question; why are building demolition contractors wasting time strategically placing detonation charges on buildings for demolition when they can just start an office fire with office furniture and printing paper to bring buildings down in a free fall collapse?
Sorry for being mean, but I think this is fricking dumb.
Correct. Then ask yourself, why is this part of the official narrative?
Posted on 9/12/24 at 11:12 am to GumboPot
Why is the notion that there was a fire that brought the building down part of the official narrative? Well it makes a lot more sense than intentionally bringing a building down for demolition purposes with an office fire. Maybe that’s why?
This post was edited on 9/12/24 at 11:13 am
Posted on 9/12/24 at 12:04 pm to GumboPot
quote:Dunno. How many 'art students' do you have?
How many people do you think would have to be involved in a conspiracy
The Israeli "art student" mystery
Posted on 9/12/24 at 12:23 pm to baybeefeetz
quote:
Why is the notion that there was a fire that brought the building down part of the official narrative? Well it makes a lot more sense than intentionally bringing a building down for demolition purposes with an office fire. Maybe that’s why?
Because in your words its " fricking dumb".
That's why I jokingly made the claim that if fires with office furniture and copy machine paper can bring down the building, why would a demolition contractor go through all the trouble of setting shape charges to cut steel beams in strategic locations to fell a high rise building? It takes weeks if not months of preparation to get those charges in the right location so the building collapses properly. It's not an easy task to get a high rise structural steel building to collapse in its own footprint.
The NIST report speculates the source of the fire in Building 7 was progressive fires from office to office consisting of mostly "cubicles". LINK
Office fires cannot bring down a high rise structural steel building in a free fall collapse in its own footprint. Impossible.
If that were the case then office fires would be an effective tool for demolition contractors because it's so darn cheap.
Posted on 9/12/24 at 12:26 pm to blueboy
quote:
The Israeli "art student" mystery
Posted on 9/12/24 at 12:31 pm to GumboPot
quote:Im sure fracturing structural members fail silently, amiright?
You are tying to convince me that what I see on video and fireman witness testimony as to explosions prior to collapse are not related to a controlled demolition
Posted on 9/12/24 at 12:32 pm to GumboPot
quote:We do non-linear analyses like this every day.
Its not simply applying the coefficient of linear expansion problem as if the temperature is homogeneous through the entire beam. It's not and this approach way over estimates thermal expansion.
Posted on 9/12/24 at 12:36 pm to David_DJS
quote:Not even that. Even the little 1/4 tensile test specimens every engineering student gets to break makes really loud bang when it hits its tensile strength and breaks.
You think that it's unusual for a building that's been on fire four hours to have explosions?
quote:Allegedly. If he is, he’s trolling.
Dude, you're an engineer FFS.
Posted on 9/12/24 at 12:43 pm to GumboPot
quote:Exactly.Why didn’t it float off like a hot air balloon?
And the free fall nature of Building 7
Posted on 9/12/24 at 12:46 pm to Taxing Authority
Posted on 9/12/24 at 12:52 pm to GumboPot
All three were planned demolitions
Posted on 9/12/24 at 12:52 pm to Taxing Authority
Sound of a steel specimen in a yield/tensile strength procedure:
Sound of a demolition shape charge:
Youtube Link
It is very wrong to think the sound signature from the two cases are anywhere close to each other.
Sound of a demolition shape charge:
Youtube Link
It is very wrong to think the sound signature from the two cases are anywhere close to each other.
Posted on 9/12/24 at 12:53 pm to Willie Stroker
quote:Too young for Fiddlers on the Roof ?
I personally have not seen any Jews dance, ever.
Posted on 9/12/24 at 12:53 pm to GumboPot
Me. Until I’m shown evidence of a massive yet covert project in which a demolition team could have set charges in a building fully open to the public & nobody noticed anything unusual.
Which would have taken weeks too, by the way.
Which would have taken weeks too, by the way.
This post was edited on 9/12/24 at 12:54 pm
Posted on 9/12/24 at 1:01 pm to 87PurpleandGold
quote:
Exactly. Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld. All orchestrated. People are in denial bc they can't believe our govt would do such a thing. It was the same reaction for decades when they killed JFK.
Our government would never lie on an issue of this magnitude. The Science Is Settled®.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Page 11 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News