- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Do people still believe that WTC 7 was NOT a planned demolition?
Posted on 9/14/24 at 4:11 pm to LookSquirrel
Posted on 9/14/24 at 4:11 pm to LookSquirrel
Full documentary
0
Posted on 9/14/24 at 4:25 pm to LookSquirrel
quote:
Nope. I'm the one asking questions here buddy.
This works better if you can provide plausible answers.
“Just asking questions” is the easy part.
Posted on 9/14/24 at 4:33 pm to Willie Stroker
quote:
How do you explain the body parts from the known plane passengers who obviously boarded their flight elsewhere?
Wait a minute. Body parts! From the passengers?
You have a link, or anything to prove they recovered such "body parts"?
Posted on 9/14/24 at 4:35 pm to Willie Stroker
quote:
“Just asking questions” is the easy part.
And yet, that's all you have done. Now answer the "body parts" question.
Or is it too hard?
Posted on 9/14/24 at 5:13 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Demolition contractors should just ignite abandoned office furniture and printing paper at the bottom of buildings to be demolished instead of using professional charges and months of building prep. It's apparently a novel, cheap and effective way to demolish structural steel buildings. Of all the consequences that have come out of 911 who would have thunk that a new business model for demolition contractors would have been born?
This is really stupid to suggest. I really hope you aren't an engineer of any kind is this is the kind of rationale you employ. This really lends credence to the crazy conspiracy theorist's stereotype.
Posted on 9/14/24 at 5:16 pm to Willie Stroker
"This works better if you can provide plausible answers."
Now tell me about those "body parts".
Or don't you have the courage to say you can't back that up?
Now tell me about those "body parts".
Or don't you have the courage to say you can't back that up?
Posted on 9/14/24 at 6:53 pm to LookSquirrel
quote:
Prove me wrong.
I literally just did prove you wrong. Instead of admitting it... now you say the planes aren't cgi they were actually drones
I am not "programmed". In fact I believe 9/11 was an inside job. I'm just pointing out that the picture you posted makes anyone going against the narrative look bad
The wing is exactly were it should be and it's painfully obvious. If you look at that picture and think those buildings are behind the trade center it can only be because you want everything to match your view points regardless of its validity.
Maybe instead of sky screaming and getting pissed off you should take more time to think so you don't come across as nuts
This post was edited on 9/14/24 at 6:58 pm
Posted on 9/14/24 at 6:54 pm to LookSquirrel
Posted on 9/14/24 at 7:27 pm to Willie Stroker
Your link from Ptch.com must have taken some to find.
Second link.
I'd be curious as to whats the rest of story. But I don't want to be callous by asking further questions reported in those 2 sources.
I'll just take your sources for what they are worth, as heart wrenching they seem.
Were good. Let us end this back and forth. If you want claim victory, then fine.
Live a long and prosperous life.
quote:
During the recovery process, a six-inch piece of bone belonging to Peter Hanson was identified. The remains of many others on United Airlines Flight 175 were never recovered.
Second link.
quote:
In the end, a bone fragment, a skin-tissue sample, part of the right hip, and part of a collarbone were found.
I'd be curious as to whats the rest of story. But I don't want to be callous by asking further questions reported in those 2 sources.
I'll just take your sources for what they are worth, as heart wrenching they seem.
Were good. Let us end this back and forth. If you want claim victory, then fine.
Live a long and prosperous life.
Posted on 9/14/24 at 7:32 pm to LookSquirrel
quote:
Care to explain these quotes from your link?
Can't. The link says they are artists. Probably flunked out of math class.
quote:
Also, art history students are normally not concerned with removing a window and installing a small, wooden balcony at a height of three hundred meters and attaching devices to the facade with abseiling. Also, art students normally do not have a helicopter to fly around skyscrapers.
Artists seem to make a living by doing things other artists aren't doing. I wonder if that's why they call it art?
Do you admit you were duped into thinking you were posting photos of dancing Israelis when you were simply being lied to by liars who "borrowed" those pics from an Austrian group of artists?
Posted on 9/14/24 at 11:31 pm to GumboPot
So who set the charges? When? How long did it take to set? Who's going into a structurally unsound building that's had internal fire damage to determine where the charges go, drill them into the columns, wiring live charges and THEN setting them off? During all that chaos and confusion?
Who? Names. Company.
*And why do I see 2 replies (one being mine) to Gumbo Pot's post, but only one shows up when I click 'replies'?
Who? Names. Company.
*And why do I see 2 replies (one being mine) to Gumbo Pot's post, but only one shows up when I click 'replies'?
This post was edited on 9/14/24 at 11:33 pm
Page 17 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News