re: Do people still believe that WTC 7 was NOT a planned demolition?

quote:

---

How do you explain the body parts from the known plane passengers who obviously boarded their flight elsewhere?

---

Wait a minute. Body parts! From the passengers?

You have a link, or anything to prove they recovered such "body parts"?

quote:

---

Demolition contractors should just ignite abandoned office furniture and printing paper at the bottom of buildings to be demolished instead of using professional charges and months of building prep. It's apparently a novel, cheap and effective way to demolish structural steel buildings. Of all the consequences that have come out of 911 who would have thunk that a new business model for demolition contractors would have been born?

---

This is really stupid to suggest. I really hope you aren't an engineer of any kind is this is the kind of rationale you employ. This really lends credence to the crazy conspiracy theorist's stereotype.

quote:

---

Prove me wrong.

---

I literally just did prove you wrong. Instead of admitting it... now you say the planes aren't cgi they were actually drones

I am not "programmed". In fact I believe 9/11 was an inside job. I'm just pointing out that the picture you posted makes anyone going against the narrative look bad

The wing is exactly were it should be and it's painfully obvious. If you look at that picture and think those buildings are behind the trade center it can only be because you want everything to match your view points regardless of its validity.

Maybe instead of sky screaming and getting pissed off you should take more time to think so you don't come across as nuts

Your link from Ptch.com must have taken some to find.

quote:

---

During the recovery process, a six-inch piece of bone belonging to Peter Hanson was identified. The remains of many others on United Airlines Flight 175 were never recovered.

---

Second link.

quote:

---

In the end, a bone fragment, a skin-tissue sample, part of the right hip, and part of a collarbone were found.

---

I'd be curious as to whats the rest of story. But I don't want to be callous by asking further questions reported in those 2 sources.

I'll just take your sources for what they are worth, as heart wrenching they seem.

Were good. Let us end this back and forth. If you want claim victory, then fine.

Live a long and prosperous life.

So who set the charges? When? How long did it take to set? Who's going into a structurally unsound building that's had internal fire damage to determine where the charges go, drill them into the columns, wiring live charges and THEN setting them off? During all that chaos and confusion?

Who? Names. Company.


*And why do I see 2 replies (one being mine) to Gumbo Pot's post, but only one shows up when I click 'replies'?