10
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
DJT - we don't need a deal with Iran, JD to focus all attention on corruption and crime.
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:00 pm
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:00 pm
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:03 pm to Bunk Moreland
A “deal” isn’t possible with Islamic maniacs
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:09 pm to Bunk Moreland
Wasn’t dealing with corruption his original primary goal? Why did he balk on it in the first place?
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:10 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
we don't need a deal with Iran
Fair enough.
So then what is the resolution to the long term US military presence and continued policing of the strait and neighboring countries?
It's fair to criticize the handling of this conflict and the variable messaging along the way.
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:12 pm to Bunk Moreland
Took this many months to come to that conclusion?
This post was edited on 11/12/26 at 7:14 pm
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:15 pm to AndyCBR
quote:
It's fair to criticize the handling of this conflict and the variable messaging along the way.
Sure, as long as you also acknowledge the fact it was/is one of the most successful military conflicts in modern history
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:16 pm to Bunk Moreland
We have no real political reason to end the conflict with Iran now. The sanctions will starve them out.
We need to focus on these corrupt fricks.
We need to focus on these corrupt fricks.
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:19 pm to Bunk Moreland
I wonder if JD didn’t go to him and request off the assignment. It never fit him to begin with.
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:20 pm to AndyCBR
quote:
Fair enough. So then what is the resolution to the long term US military presence and continued policing of the strait and neighboring countries? It's fair to criticize the handling of this conflict and the variable messaging along the way.
Fair enough. It cost the house and senate majority. He needs to finish this one way or another. The decision to meet this head on was made and it has cost us dearly politically. It can still be a win for the world if the objective that was originally conceived is achieved. That is the only way to save his legacy at this point.
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:22 pm to Bunk Moreland
He should start with the corruption in his own administration. For example, the outrageous overpayment by ICE for warehouses.
quote:
• Salt Lake City, Utah: Purchased for nearly $150 million (roughly $48 million to $50 million above its assessed value of around $97 million).
• Roxbury, New Jersey: A warehouse assessed at $62 million was bought from Goldman Sachs for nearly $130 million (137% over its valuation).
• Social Circle, Georgia: A property valued around $26 million was acquired for $129 million.
• Tremont, Pennsylvania: Acquired from Blue Owl at approximately double its market valuation.
• Sakoro, Texas: Acquired at prices reported up to 1,000% above recent valuations.
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:22 pm to boosiebadazz
Maybe. But, I think he did his best to resolve this. He probably doesn't want to be thrown under the bus as things unravel.
I watch a bunch of alt media guys who say we have no serious diplomats right now. The real estate guys are a clown show. Rubio could maybe do that, but he is not going to grind out a 20 month JCPOA type negotiation. He is too distracted with a bunch of other things.
I watch a bunch of alt media guys who say we have no serious diplomats right now. The real estate guys are a clown show. Rubio could maybe do that, but he is not going to grind out a 20 month JCPOA type negotiation. He is too distracted with a bunch of other things.
This post was edited on 11/12/26 at 7:24 pm
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:25 pm to Bunk Moreland
Trump's not wrong about seriously reducing the federal deficit by the elimination of hundreds of billions of fraud, waste and outright theft annually of US taxpayer dollars. But what's equally important is prosecuting and imprisoning those who are guilty of the fraud and theft.
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:31 pm to Bunk Moreland
I don’t doubt JD tried to do the task he was assigned. I also think he was against it from the start and was proven correct when it became a quagmire. It wouldn’t surprise me if he told DJT he doesn’t want to take the political hit on it and he can either be removed from the assignment or he can become more assertive in speaking his mind about it.
This post was edited on 11/12/26 at 7:33 pm
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:31 pm to Bunk Moreland
I like the whole message except the part in which he says we could balance the budget by eliminating fraud. That is a damaging lie.
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:33 pm to TBoy
quote:
above its assessed value
Dude, you can’t go by assessed values. I’m sure they overpaid, but that is a ridiculous metric.
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:34 pm to SundayFunday
quote:
Sure, as long as you also acknowledge the fact it was/is one of the most successful military conflicts in modern history
The outcome is not complete and we are still actively conducting strikes.
By your definition, the war in Iraq was a rousing success because we steamrolled the Iraqi army on the front end. But what did the 20 year ME occupation really gain us?
I'm not saying there wasn't a good reason to strike Iran, but the exit strategy is unclear at best.
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:35 pm to Bunk Moreland
hundreds of billions of dollars!
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:36 pm to AndyCBR
quote:
So then what is the resolution to the long term US military presence and continued policing of the strait and neighboring countries?
There is no "resolution" to instability in the Middle East. There never has been, there never will be.
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:38 pm to Penrod
Now you know that every seller has always agreed to sell for the assessed value. Socialists and communists know nothing about markets.
Tell me how many would sell their homes for the tax assessed value?
Tell me how many would sell their homes for the tax assessed value?
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:38 pm to PowerTool
Sorry I didn't see Timeoday's thread from earlier today. Mods, feel free to nuke this.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News