- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Did Charlie Kirk actually engage in hate speech?
Posted on 9/12/25 at 11:47 am to selfgen
Posted on 9/12/25 at 11:47 am to selfgen
the worst thing Charlie ever did was be condescending once and a while. But in his defense, he deals with alot of complete dumb arse kids on the left.
Outside of that, no.
If you are a tranny lover, and can't define what a woman is, then I would guess you would label it hate speech.
People on the left are dopesick without clutching their pearls on something.
Outside of that, no.
If you are a tranny lover, and can't define what a woman is, then I would guess you would label it hate speech.
People on the left are dopesick without clutching their pearls on something.
0
Posted on 9/12/25 at 11:47 am to selfgen
I’m a huge CK fan. So don’t shoot the messenger.
He hurt a lot of feelings when he discussed quotas, DEI, etc. He pointed out that a persons merit was in question with merit vs DEI hires. They thought it was racist to argue this point and it slighted black people.
He also railed against black culture and the amount of blacks in prison. Not a race issue to him, but nanny state government and glorifying rap music was the problem with the black culture.
And he didn’t buy into trannies as mutilating kids. Also men competing in women’s sports.
That’s what they point to as hate speech. But it was simply putting common sense arguments forward to tackle tough issues we face. Youth either love or hate when you speak the truth and that’s why CK was so polarizing.
I’ve never seen anyone in his position as effective of a speaker, leader as CK. He had all the tools.
He hurt a lot of feelings when he discussed quotas, DEI, etc. He pointed out that a persons merit was in question with merit vs DEI hires. They thought it was racist to argue this point and it slighted black people.
He also railed against black culture and the amount of blacks in prison. Not a race issue to him, but nanny state government and glorifying rap music was the problem with the black culture.
And he didn’t buy into trannies as mutilating kids. Also men competing in women’s sports.
That’s what they point to as hate speech. But it was simply putting common sense arguments forward to tackle tough issues we face. Youth either love or hate when you speak the truth and that’s why CK was so polarizing.
I’ve never seen anyone in his position as effective of a speaker, leader as CK. He had all the tools.
This post was edited on 9/12/25 at 11:49 am
Posted on 9/12/25 at 11:49 am to LuckyTiger
Great example here. Media and influential people regurgitating lies without checking. I hope Charlie's widow sues for slander just to make a point.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 11:52 am to selfgen
quote:No
Did Charlie Kirk actually engage in hate speech?
Posted on 9/12/25 at 11:52 am to Rebel
quote:
I couldn’t find any hate. He was unapologetically Christian.
Well, if your a leftist, there's your hate speech.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 11:53 am to selfgen
There’s no such thing as hate speech.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 11:53 am to selfgen
As hate speech is a myth, the answer is no.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 11:53 am to VoxDawg
quote:what they REALLY hated that it was effective and was changing the electorate.
No, but liberals hated the truths that he spoke.
Anyone, on the right, who encroaches on their ability to monopolize power (as marxists insist on doing) must die. That's why they hate Trump; he's been effective. That's why the celebrated the death of Kirk (and Limbaugh); they were effective.
They have no reason or want to get rid of status quo RINOs. Sad fact is Trump has shifted the R's to the left slightly more towards the middle. He's anything but an extremist if you look at his policies. But that's not why they hate him and people like Kirk- it is because they are effective.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 11:53 am to sparkinator
quote:
That’s what they point to as hate speech.
And, to be blunt, they are stupid for doing so.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 11:54 am to selfgen
Free speech is hate speech.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 11:56 am to selfgen
Charlie's only crime was challenging young people to think for themselves.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 11:56 am to Padme
quote:To be fair, Rush was extremely salty and quite unfiltered in his beginning years. He learned nuance as his fame increased and his message grew into a juggernaut of conservatism. His viewpoint never wavered but his presentation became more palatable to even many of his staunch rivals.
They said the same about Rush
Posted on 9/12/25 at 11:59 am to MemphisGuy
quote:
d, to be blunt, they are stupid for doing so.
I agree. CK was the best of us. Generational talent gets tossed around a lot but this guy had it. And loved what he did. And was so good at going into the lions den and making converts.
Like was posted earlier, they hated him because he was effective. He was brilliant and waded through detractors like a knife through butter. Some that he debated were so stupid they couldn’t understand just how badly he destroyed arguments, so they took it as hate.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 12:00 pm to selfgen
The left deems anything they disagree with as hate speech. The root of the issues are that their ideas can’t stand on their own during any civil debate so they have to result to demonizing those who dissent.
It’s communism 101.
It’s communism 101.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 12:00 pm to selfgen
Half the videos I saw from the guys debates were just regular arse apolitical chitchat that friends would have. Pancakes or waffles? Jordan or LeBron? What’s your Waffle House order? What’s your Starbucks order?
Dude love engaging in conversations with his fellow man. He loves hearing the pov of others and sharing his and insane people couldn’t handle that.
Dude love engaging in conversations with his fellow man. He loves hearing the pov of others and sharing his and insane people couldn’t handle that.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 12:01 pm to selfgen
Haven't you heard? Not letting Lilith's mentally retarded brother shite in the women's restroom is literal hate speech!
Posted on 9/12/25 at 12:02 pm to selfgen
They are referring to Christianity....
Posted on 9/12/25 at 12:02 pm to selfgen
Hate speech doesn’t exist so, no, he didn’t. It’s hard to partake in something that’s imaginary
Posted on 9/12/25 at 12:03 pm to selfgen
quote:
What do they consider “hate speech”?
He called Ketanji Jackson Hole Brown dumb. So obviously he’s a racist.
He said transgenderism wasn’t a real thing so obviously he wanted she/they/its to die.
He believe in marriage between a man and woman so he hated gays.
It’s all pretty easy.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 12:11 pm to selfgen
Saying women can’t have a penis is hate speech to these nut jobs.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News