- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
DHS is restoring the basic principle that immigrants must be able to support themselves
Posted on 7/16/26 at 11:24 am
Posted on 7/16/26 at 11:24 am
No more free rides...who all will be leaving?
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 7/16/26 at 11:27 am to Ailsa
I have a hard time believing there's been a single thing done during this admin that will not be immediately undone or made worse by the next lefty administration.
Trump has certainly done a lot more than many before him, but the massive dumps by the Soros/NGO-USAID networks 2020-2024 isnt even close to being undone.
The only way to end this is to tax remittances more, keep kicking people off welfare, force citizen identifiers on taxes and end birthright citizenship.
None of this will ever happen.
Trump has certainly done a lot more than many before him, but the massive dumps by the Soros/NGO-USAID networks 2020-2024 isnt even close to being undone.
The only way to end this is to tax remittances more, keep kicking people off welfare, force citizen identifiers on taxes and end birthright citizenship.
None of this will ever happen.
Posted on 7/16/26 at 11:29 am to tiggerthetooth
quote:
I have a hard time believing there's been a single thing done during this admin that will not be immediately undone or made worse by the next lefty administration.
If the SAVE act is passed...it will never happen.
Posted on 7/16/26 at 11:38 am to Ailsa
This shouldn’t even be f*cking debatable. All these scumbag, f*cking liberals keep talking about how America has been a nation of immigrants and how we’ve always taken in the wretched and the poor. What they don’t mention is that in the past, these people came here with nothing more than the shirt on their back and had to work their asses off just to feed themselves.
Now, in order to create a perpetual underclass totally depend upon government handouts, Democrats want to give all of these motherf*ckers everything for free. They want to make sure that these animals never get off the government dole and will always have to vote for Democrats to keep all the free shite flowing.
F*CK THAT!
We don’t have the funds and it’s not what our taxes should be used for. more importantly, we shouldn’t be going even more trillions in debt so the Democrats can import voters because Americans will no longer vote for their demented and deranged agenda.
Now, in order to create a perpetual underclass totally depend upon government handouts, Democrats want to give all of these motherf*ckers everything for free. They want to make sure that these animals never get off the government dole and will always have to vote for Democrats to keep all the free shite flowing.
F*CK THAT!
We don’t have the funds and it’s not what our taxes should be used for. more importantly, we shouldn’t be going even more trillions in debt so the Democrats can import voters because Americans will no longer vote for their demented and deranged agenda.
Posted on 7/16/26 at 11:42 am to MMauler
quote:
Americans will no longer vote for their demented and deranged agenda.
Many American's votes were never counted...or were flipped. The system has been rigged for decades. One way or another, Trump will get the SAVE act passed and codified so it will never happen again.
Posted on 7/16/26 at 12:00 pm to MMauler
It's NOT debatable. It's in the damn law. Research the INA..
9 FAM 302.8-2(B)(1) Definition of Public Charge
(CT:VISA-2018; 07-01-2024)
a. In General:
(1) When determining ineligibility under INA 212(a)(4), the term "public charge" means that an individual, after admission into the United States, is likely to become primarily dependent on the U.S. Government for subsistence. This means either:
(a) (U) Receipt of public cash assistance for income maintenance (see paragraph b below); or
(b) (U) Institutionalization for long-term care at U.S. Government expense (see paragraph d below). Short-term confinement in a medical institution for rehabilitation does not constitute primary dependence on the U.S. Government for subsistence.
(2) (U) When considering the likelihood of an applicant becoming a “public charge,” you look at the totality of the applicant's circumstances at the time of visa application. See 9 FAM 302.8-2(B)(3) below.
(3) (U) In determining ineligibility under INA 212(a)(4) many factors are relevant, including age, health, family status, assets, resources, financial status, education, and skills. No single factor, other than the lack of a qualifying affidavit of support, in accordance with INA 213A, if required, will determine whether an individual is a public charge.
b. Defining Public Cash Assistance: In the "public charge" context, "public cash assistance” for income maintenance includes:
(1) Supplemental security income (SSI);
(2) Cash temporary assistance for needy families (TANF), but not including supplemental cash benefits or any non-cash benefits provided under TANF; and
(3) State and local cash assistance programs that provide for income maintenance (often called state general assistance).
(4) These types of assistance are sometimes also referred to as “means tested benefits.”
9 FAM 302.8-2(B)(1) Definition of Public Charge
(CT:VISA-2018; 07-01-2024)
a. In General:
(1) When determining ineligibility under INA 212(a)(4), the term "public charge" means that an individual, after admission into the United States, is likely to become primarily dependent on the U.S. Government for subsistence. This means either:
(a) (U) Receipt of public cash assistance for income maintenance (see paragraph b below); or
(b) (U) Institutionalization for long-term care at U.S. Government expense (see paragraph d below). Short-term confinement in a medical institution for rehabilitation does not constitute primary dependence on the U.S. Government for subsistence.
(2) (U) When considering the likelihood of an applicant becoming a “public charge,” you look at the totality of the applicant's circumstances at the time of visa application. See 9 FAM 302.8-2(B)(3) below.
(3) (U) In determining ineligibility under INA 212(a)(4) many factors are relevant, including age, health, family status, assets, resources, financial status, education, and skills. No single factor, other than the lack of a qualifying affidavit of support, in accordance with INA 213A, if required, will determine whether an individual is a public charge.
b. Defining Public Cash Assistance: In the "public charge" context, "public cash assistance” for income maintenance includes:
(1) Supplemental security income (SSI);
(2) Cash temporary assistance for needy families (TANF), but not including supplemental cash benefits or any non-cash benefits provided under TANF; and
(3) State and local cash assistance programs that provide for income maintenance (often called state general assistance).
(4) These types of assistance are sometimes also referred to as “means tested benefits.”
Posted on 7/16/26 at 12:01 pm to Ailsa
quote:
DHS is restoring the basic principle that immigrants must be able to support themselves
I other words STOP FEEDING THE FERRAL CATS!
Posted on 7/16/26 at 12:12 pm to Ailsa
The public charge ground never went away under Biden. This has been the law for many, many years. All this does is give USCIS more discretion to deny based on any factor not just an enumerated list of factors. Practically speaking, this doesn't change much IMO.
Posted on 7/16/26 at 12:15 pm to lionward2014
quote:
The public charge ground never went away under Biden. This has been the law for many, many years. All this does is give USCIS more discretion to deny based on any factor not just an enumerated list of factors. Practically speaking, this doesn't change much IMO.
Biden is no longer in office and the laws will be changed to eliminate not only fraud but taxpayer funded immigrants.
Posted on 7/16/26 at 12:20 pm to Ailsa
quote:
Biden is no longer in office and the laws will be changed to eliminate not only fraud but taxpayer funded immigrants.
The law never allowed that though.
ETA: In fact even pre-INA public charge inadmissibility was a thing.
This post was edited on 7/16/26 at 12:22 pm
Posted on 7/16/26 at 12:23 pm to Ailsa
quote:
If the SAVE act is passed...it will never happen.
Posted on 7/16/26 at 12:25 pm to omegaman66
quote:
If the SAVE act is passed...it will never happen.
One way or another, Trump will get it done.
Posted on 7/16/26 at 12:32 pm to Ailsa
quote:
One way or another, Trump will get it done.
I hope so. But it is going to be hard to get the dims to vote for their own death warrant.
Posted on 7/16/26 at 12:42 pm to lionward2014
quote:
The law never allowed that though. The public charge ground has been around since the INA was passed.
The issue is biden never adhered. Heck they made ss# available to people who should have been given itin numbers, just so they could start skimming the system, it was a design not a flaw, so of course they werent going to deport them for dipping in the till. Im certain the 1000s of ngos instructed them on how to do it.
Posted on 7/16/26 at 12:44 pm to Ailsa
If all western countries would cut off welfare to immigrants, they would stop coming and most would leave.
It’s really simple. In the UK 80%+ of immigrants are on govt assistance. That’s pathetic
It’s really simple. In the UK 80%+ of immigrants are on govt assistance. That’s pathetic
Posted on 7/16/26 at 12:50 pm to Ailsa
and now a message from our sponsor THE EXTREME LEFT
Republicans have made us an uncaring and evil nation
In my opinion this should have been the policy for the past many years. Another hard decision which is made by President Trump the unPOLITICIAN. Decisions like this are not hard. It is about doing the RIGHT THING!
Republicans have made us an uncaring and evil nation
In my opinion this should have been the policy for the past many years. Another hard decision which is made by President Trump the unPOLITICIAN. Decisions like this are not hard. It is about doing the RIGHT THING!
Posted on 7/16/26 at 1:00 pm to MMauler
quote:
F*CK THAT!
Agreed 100%! Why should our tax dollars feed ANYONE unwilling to work?
Even more so for folks that are in the country illegally?
Clown world!
Posted on 7/16/26 at 1:05 pm to CoachChappy
quote:
If all western countries would cut off welfare to immigrants, they would stop coming and most would leave.
Remember when all the illegals were massed at the Mexican border and Trump said you wait there, not in the US, until your case can be heard, remember they all feared for their lives in their home country.
Suddenly, when they had to wait in Mexico, it was like Forrest Gump stopped running. They all turned around and went home.
Posted on 7/16/26 at 1:07 pm to lake chuck fan
It used to be when you went home the anchor babies went with you, they could return when they were 18. You didnt get to stick them with a "sponsor" and continue to milk the cow.
Popular
Back to top


9








