- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dept of Education to be funded in new spending bill, despite claims it will be abolished
Posted on 1/24/26 at 7:03 am to hawgfaninc
Posted on 1/24/26 at 7:03 am to hawgfaninc
quote:
It’ll probably be vetoed
No probably.
It must be vetoed.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 7:04 am to udtiger
quote:
No probably.
It must be vetoed.
It passed the 341 votes in the House. It is "veto proof". By design.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 7:07 am to frogtown
quote:
quote:
No probably.
It must be vetoed.
It passed the 341 votes in the House. It is "veto proof". By design
Then make the GOP do it. Be ause this only gets 341 votes if about 130 Republicans vote for it.
They might be all full of beans now, but I dont know if they'd all be willing to vote that way over Trump's veto with primaries coming up.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 8:12 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
He didn't want the cuts and here we are
Do you give a shite when it's not "Trump's fault"?
The GOP has grown government as much as any leftist up until now.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 8:47 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:It’s the long game. Pass this stuff now and after retaining a majority at the midterms, a bunch of cuts will be coming. /s
He didn't want the cuts and here we are
Posted on 1/24/26 at 8:55 am to AUCom96
quote:
Do you give a shite when it's not "Trump's fault"?
I had hope Trump would lead a major crusade to legitimately cut spending. He has not. He's proposed even more spending (see: comments about military budget).
But, more importantly, my comment was to someone trying to separate Trump from Congress, so that only Congress gets blame. That's ridiculous, as I pointed out.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 8:59 am to frogtown
quote:
Both of you are wrong....again. Massie voted against this
"Again" implies there was a first time.
Good for him for getting something right eventually.
This post was edited on 1/24/26 at 9:00 am
Posted on 1/24/26 at 10:02 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
But, more importantly, my comment was to someone trying to separate Trump from Congress, so that only Congress gets blame. That's ridiculous, as I pointed out.
You just do the opposite.
No one is ever going to cut spending... not as long as it costs millions upon millions to run a competitive national campaign. If your point is to say Trump is no better on that point, no shite. Trump has never been a fiscal conservative. There isn't a true fiscal conservative anywhere in Washington D.C. and there hasn't been one since Calvin Coolidge. But it's Congress who is in charge of spending legislation, not Trump. But you play your game. It's one note, but I guess it entertains you.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 10:13 am to AUCom96
quote:Respect your presidential history game. History doesn’t treat him kindly because he didn’t believe the US could spend their way out of every problem.
Calvin Coolidge
Posted on 1/24/26 at 10:17 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
As is almost always the case "some of us" were proven to be right.
Remember when you said that no leftists post on TD?

Posted on 1/24/26 at 10:21 am to hawgfaninc
MAGA doesn't know how to win outside of an election every 8 years. Increasingly, they distorted way that MAGA thinks society works seems to be as far away from reality as what the commie progs think in regards to how things should work.
Let me explain...there are not enough MAGA votes to simply do away with it and the POTUS is not constitutionally empowered to dictate it away. They can cut it and shrink it and control it until they get enough MAGA votes to actually kill it. To do that MAGA needs to expand it's base but what I'm seeing it's fracturing and shrinking.
Let me explain...there are not enough MAGA votes to simply do away with it and the POTUS is not constitutionally empowered to dictate it away. They can cut it and shrink it and control it until they get enough MAGA votes to actually kill it. To do that MAGA needs to expand it's base but what I'm seeing it's fracturing and shrinking.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 10:23 am to hawgfaninc
quote:
Dept of Education to be funded in new spending bill, despite claims it will be abolished
Of course. They have no intention of killing the DoE because they love flexing its power. Even this admin has relied heavily on the power and leverage of the DoE.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 10:24 am to AUCom96
quote:
Trump has never been a fiscal conservative
Trump ran on cutting $2T in spending via DOGE in case you forgot.
If we should be admonished for hoping we'd accomplish at least some meaningful reduction in spending because of that promise, admonish us.
Popular
Back to top


1







