- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Department Of Education Throws A Wrench Into NCAA Revenue Sharing Model With Title IX Rule
Posted on 1/16/25 at 9:40 pm
Posted on 1/16/25 at 9:40 pm
quote:
On Thursday, the United States Department of Education civil rights office put out a memo clarifying some of the new rules pertaining to NIL payments and how Title IX will have a major impact on how athletes are paid moving forward.
Mind you, a lot of this can change over the next year, as a new regime will be welcomed into the White House, which could have a major impact on how some of the ‘rules’ are going to be interpreted.
There have been a lot of questions surrounding the new revenue-sharing model that is projected to be approved in the coming months, paving the way for schools to start paying athletes from within their own athletic department. Right now, these payments to athletes are mostly coming from outside third-party collectives, which are not legally conjoined with universities.
One of the most important parts of the nine-page memo that was released on Thursday pertains to how revenue shared with student athletes is going to be classified in this new era. Going forward, money that is paid from the school to an athlete will be viewed as ‘financial assistance’, and if they are not proportionally divided, every participating school could be violating federal Title IX laws.
LINK
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. I posted this on the MSB too for the folks that don’t visit the poli board.
35
Posted on 1/16/25 at 9:42 pm to GumboPot
That's bull crap. Subsidizing low revenue nonsense.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 9:43 pm to GumboPot
We need to abolish the NCAA and the Department of Education.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 9:43 pm to rpg37
How can they do this without defining what a woman is?
Posted on 1/16/25 at 9:46 pm to GumboPot
It should be any sport, male or female, that brings in positive revenue gets to share.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 9:49 pm to GumboPot
This seems like a big deal. Will it stand after Monday?
Posted on 1/16/25 at 9:49 pm to GumboPot
Time to repeal Title 9 and the Department or Education.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 9:51 pm to GumboPot
They are "in charge" for one more working day. They shouldn't be making huge news. Play some games on your computer and collect your check instead of making more work for the people that will be in charge.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 9:52 pm to GumboPot
I knew Title lX would rear it's ugly head in current day, but I was thinking more of actually protecting women, not this shite.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 9:54 pm to imjustafatkid
Posted on 1/16/25 at 9:57 pm to GumboPot
Lulz! Biden is trash but good on Biden, frick NIL it’s destroying amateurism. It will also piss off a lot of younger kids.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:00 pm to SOSFAN
quote:
should be any sport, male or female, that brings in positive revenue gets to share.
It should be proportionate to the amount of revenue brought it. That is how businesses run without government interference.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:00 pm to momentoftruth87
This is revenue sharing not NIL.
I think Clay Travis is conflating NIL with Revenue sharing.
I think Clay Travis is conflating NIL with Revenue sharing.
This post was edited on 1/16/25 at 10:02 pm
Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:01 pm to SaturatedPhat
It’s a trap. If Trump rescinds he is anti women.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:02 pm to SOSFAN
quote:
t should be any sport, male or female, that brings in positive revenue gets to share.
It should be that the schools can give out the money however they choose to.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:02 pm to GumboPot
And collectives aren’t NIL.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:04 pm to GumboPot
quote:
I think Clay Travis is conflating NIL with Revenue sharing.
If that’s true then my response would be different. I was going off NIL which isn’t NIL, it’s collectives. As a sports fan I don’t have a problem if someone is making money from their NIL but NIL is a money pot with no cap. Never been a fan.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:21 pm to GumboPot
Solution:
“I’m an executive order and I pretty much just happen.”
“I’m an executive order and I pretty much just happen.”
Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:37 pm to GumboPot
I don't remember if it was here or MSB or somewhere else, but this was brought up some time ago, and some speculated that Title IX was going to create chaos here. I'm not a fan of what Title IX did to college sports as it lead to hundreds of men's teams getting shut down, but this issuance is totally consistent with Title IX and how it's been implemented. We'll see what Trump does after the 20th. He can rescind this easily.
Posted on 1/17/25 at 12:43 am to POTUS2024
so they ripped title 9 away and now trying to bring it back?
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News