- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dan Bongino speaks about the Thomas Massie debate
Posted on 5/18/26 at 10:18 pm to DyeHardDylan
Posted on 5/18/26 at 10:18 pm to DyeHardDylan
quote:
Simply address the policies, if you can.
They can’t.
It flips so often, I imagine its hard to keep up.
Posted on 5/18/26 at 10:18 pm to 14&Counting
quote:
but it seems like with Massey he resides more or less in permanent opposition to Trump and his agenda.
Then you aren't paying any attention and are just listening to NPC talking points
quote:
The problem is he isn't a team player and in politics you got to come on in and support the team. When they really needed that extra vote to push something over the line Massey isn't here for there for them.
Oh wow, and you're doubling down with in/out group silliness.
Please re-read the post
quote:
Don't use referential or irrelevant (who endorsed him) points. Simply address the policies, if you can.
Posted on 5/18/26 at 10:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
WE GOT A REFERENTIAL ARGUMENT ATTEMPT
I'm not in debate club, and neither are most of the posters here. There are no gotcha points for breaking the debate rules "counselor". If you want to avoid addressing the merits of the comment because it disagrees with you and instead shift to rules of debate, then that reflects poorly on you. I have said what I said, and you can choose to use your big brain to extract the meaning and respond or you can deflect. Your choice.
Posted on 5/18/26 at 10:23 pm to 10thyrsr
quote:
. If you want to avoid addressing the merits of the comment because it disagrees with you
When you can adequately explain how it's relevant to a discussion of a Republican primary, I'll answer.
Note: you won't be able to, because this discussion has nothing to do with the left.
quote:
because it disagrees with you and instead shift to rules of debate,
It's about relevance, not "rules of debate".
Posted on 5/18/26 at 10:25 pm to 14&Counting
quote:Nah. Only the parts where Trump is aligned with democrats.
I haven't followed this saga particularly closely but it seems like with Massey he resides more or less in permanent opposition to Trump and his agenda.
quote:Damn. I must be getting old. I'm old enough to remember when Trump and "MAGA" was all about *NOT* going along with the GOPE. Such a long time ago....
The problem is he isn't a team player and in politics you got to come on in and support the team.
Posted on 5/18/26 at 10:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Oh wow, and you're doubling down with in/out group silliness.
What I am saying is that in politics you may have to choke one down for the greater good.
I have heard JD speak about it and the Administration's frustration has boiled over with him for being utterly unreliable. So - yeah they are going to try and get him out of there.
Posted on 5/18/26 at 10:27 pm to 14&Counting
quote:
What I am saying is that in politics you may have to choke one down for the greater good.
Update: You're still not addressing the policies. I'll post a reminder of the question for you:
quote:
What's your problem with those policies?
Don't use referential or irrelevant (who endorsed him) points. Simply address the policies, if you can.
This post was edited on 5/18/26 at 10:28 pm
Posted on 5/18/26 at 10:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
When you can adequately explain how it's relevant to a discussion of a Republican primary, I'll answer
I'm not begging for your response. My statement was a statement and it stands. Your input on many topics has been frequently incorrect and inflammatory many times. If you want to refute my comment, feel free to do so. My comment to you was an attempt to educate you that your style is not conducive to interaction on these boards and your education and understanding could be better employed here to inform people rather than being the abrasive arse you apparently enjoy being.
This post was edited on 5/18/26 at 10:31 pm
Posted on 5/18/26 at 10:30 pm to 14&Counting
quote:Paul? Paul Ryan? Issat you? Or is it John Boeher?
What I am saying is that in politics you may have to choke one down for the greater good.
Posted on 5/18/26 at 10:32 pm to 10thyrsr
quote:
If you want to refute my comment, feel free to do so.
I did. I proved it was completely irrelevant. Your attempt at a point was a failure and has been completely refuted.
quote:
and your education and understanding could be better employed here to educate people
I'm doing that right now by being very nice and explaining how relevance works. Whether you learn the lesson is on you, at this point.
Posted on 5/18/26 at 10:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
It is a shame you are being so snarky. No moment or pause for introspection. I do, truly, value your input. You make it so indigestible to everyone that your wonderful insight is lost. I'm not going to engage with you in this thread any further, but I think it is a tragedy that you do not seek to refine your technique to be more amiable.
Posted on 5/18/26 at 10:55 pm to scrooster
That fruit, Bongina, blocked me on X a few months back.
Ask him simple questions and he gets butthurt instantly.
Ask him simple questions and he gets butthurt instantly.
Posted on 5/18/26 at 10:57 pm to scrooster
Bots don’t like this story
Posted on 5/18/26 at 10:57 pm to 14&Counting
quote:
yeah they are going to try and get him out of there.
By any means necessary…
I seem to have seen that movie.
Posted on 5/18/26 at 11:16 pm to scrooster
Compromised coward has something to say...great. frick that dude for eternity
Posted on 5/18/26 at 11:21 pm to 14&Counting
I just hit a random post to reply to, but my spidey senses suspect Massie may not be the god or the devil most of you want him to be. I wonder if he's the new Ron DeSantis. He seems to have good takes, but not Trump friendly, but what if he changes hats? Then What? There's a lot people here spiking the football..
Posted on 5/18/26 at 11:21 pm to scrooster
It's a shame he turned into something completely useless.
Posted on 5/18/26 at 11:35 pm to stuntman
This meme sucks and you suck, too.
Popular
Back to top


0








