Started By
Message

re: Daily COVID Updated as of 11/2/20 8:00 PM

Posted on 3/20/20 at 1:12 pm to
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
74629 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 1:12 pm to
That’s the scary thing though

Basically every Europeans and western nation waited too long

I have faith that we will begin to see a flattening soon in Italy

Health experts are adamant that these measures can make a difference
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11949 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

Health experts are adamant that these measures can make a difference


When you start makes the difference, though. The classic case is Philadelphia (social distancing starting about 3 weeks after first cases) vs. St. Louis (about 2 days) in the 1918 flu pandemic.



This post was edited on 3/20/20 at 1:40 pm
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
74629 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 1:24 pm to
That is true, but if you lockdown and massively reduce human contact, isn’t is a given that less and less people will become infected?


I am praying so hard right now that in 2 weeks, Italy will begin to see some sort of positive trend.


Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11949 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 1:29 pm to
Yes, but what the NYT has reported that the Chinese noticed when they went to shelter-in-place was that infections kept spreading within family units, so they were forced to isolate sick with the sick in institutional settings to make the critical difference. I don't know if Americans will tolerate that. We're hoping for our ICU's to bail us out and we do have good ones.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
74629 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 1:31 pm to
But wouldn’t infections within families decline due to a lockdown?
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11949 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 1:33 pm to
Sure, after everybody gets the virus.

Seriously, though, yes it will help. But will we be able to stay under the line where you're getting significant numbers of avoidable deaths due to resources maxed out?
This post was edited on 3/20/20 at 1:37 pm
Posted by tiger91
In my own little world
Member since Nov 2005
40250 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 1:35 pm to
Why isn't that current dates? Or am I missing something?

Does anyone any charts/graphs for specific states?
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11949 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 1:38 pm to
Posted by Chromdome35
Fast lane, behind a slow driver
Member since Nov 2010
8285 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 1:39 pm to
I believe that is the 1918 Spanish Flu outbreak graph he's showing
Posted by tiger91
In my own little world
Member since Nov 2005
40250 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 1:39 pm to
Oh sorry and thank you! Missed that part.
This post was edited on 3/20/20 at 1:40 pm
Posted by Malik Agar
Member since Nov 2012
12076 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

UPDATE: Madagascar reports first 3 cases of coronavirus

Anyone that's played that plague game is now panicking.



shite wrong thread
This post was edited on 3/20/20 at 3:13 pm
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
96122 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

Madagascar reports first 3 cases of coronavirus


Shut...everything...down.
Posted by Jrv2damac
KS
Member since Mar 2004
73512 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 3:18 pm to
Deaths growth at least tumbled
Posted by Chromdome35
Fast lane, behind a slow driver
Member since Nov 2010
8285 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 3:19 pm to



I revised yesterday's final numbers to match the numbers on the worldometer site. It doesn't make any meaningful difference, it just makes things align better for those who look at the source data.
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11949 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 4:02 pm to
Hazard any guesses why we seem to be doing better witih regard to deaths than with cases?



Posted by Jobu93
Cypress TX
Member since Sep 2011
21338 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 4:02 pm to
Lowest growth rate in 3 days despite so many more tests being given. That’s encouraging.

Posted by Chromdome35
Fast lane, behind a slow driver
Member since Nov 2010
8285 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 4:06 pm to
Read the notes, the day isn't over yet, the numbers will keep going up. Good chance they could exceed yesterdays.
Posted by tiger91
In my own little world
Member since Nov 2005
40250 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 4:07 pm to
Since the number of cases will rise due to more testing, the more important one to look at would be deaths/death rate, correct? Asking as I don't know squat.
Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
35485 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 4:28 pm to
quote:

Since the number of cases will rise due to more testing, the more important one to look at would be deaths/death rate, correct? Asking as I don't know squat.


Yes and also realize that currently testing is skewed toward those with serious symptoms. We will have much more complete data from which to model once we have tests (including antibody tests) for people who've have no symptoms, minor symptoms, or who had "the flu" during flu season but tested negative and recovered. We'll see how many of those folks have had it.

If those numbers come in the way I think they will, the US death rate is going to plummet.
Posted by tiger91
In my own little world
Member since Nov 2005
40250 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 4:32 pm to
OK so say a test for antibodies comes out and it shows the person had it .. or a positive test person is asymptomatic for 14 days ... when can they ever go back to say a healthcare type field of work?
Jump to page
Page First 29 30 31 32 33 ... 331
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 31 of 331Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram