- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Court Rules 12-Year-Old's Mother Cannot Read Her the Bible, Take Her to Church
Posted on 11/30/25 at 3:09 pm to Bama Mountain
Posted on 11/30/25 at 3:09 pm to Bama Mountain
quote:
Yet again you completely ignore that I clothes my point….,but you knew that.
Clothes?
quote:
clothes
plural noun
: clothing
I need new clothes for the winter.
What word did you feed into a translator to get that?
quote:
Now back on topic. What was wrong in the article I posted? Be specific.
Is a misdemeanor a crime?
Yes or no?
Why would anyone engage with you when you can't even acknowledge a basic fact?
You are continuing to prove yourself a liar.
Again, have a tiny bit of courage and answer the question, yes or no, a Misdemeanor is a Crime.
This post was edited on 11/30/25 at 3:11 pm
1
Posted on 11/30/25 at 3:15 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Dad got this right and does not want mom taking the child to some snake-charmer evangelical cult
Was the dad's religious affiliation mentioned?
Posted on 11/30/25 at 3:19 pm to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
Was the dad's religious affiliation mentioned?
No, and it's not really relevant as his religious choices weren't being shown to hurt the child like the mothers, nor were they violating all sorts of rules with custody like the mother's "church"
Posted on 11/30/25 at 3:22 pm to Narax
quote:
, have a tiny bit of courage
What was wrong in the article I posted? Be specific……Of course you will not answer.
Posted on 11/30/25 at 3:27 pm to Bama Mountain
quote:
What was wrong in the article I posted? Be specific……Of course you will not answer.
The second you actually answer if a misdemeanor is a crime.
Posted on 11/30/25 at 3:44 pm to Bama Mountain
quote:
Of course you will not answer.
Says the guy running from his statement that misdemeanors aren’t crimes.
Posted on 11/30/25 at 3:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
shown to hurt the child
Youre fabricating this bullshite, and you know it. Proving that it could be compared to a cult is far far far from proving the child was hurt in any way.
As always youre fricking lying
quote:
it's not really relevant
It is relevant to ME, so i can inspect that belief to see if the leaders preach in a loud authoritative voice, and other moron claims made by the professor and moron judge. I asked the question. I know the relevance. And IF you were any kind of grade school paralegal, youde know that.
quote:
violating all sorts of rules with custody like the mother's "church"
More lies..but keep it up and more low iq high school kids on the board will believe you.
Hurry, drop the decision into chat gap so you can act like you've read it
Posted on 11/30/25 at 3:48 pm to Narax
quote:You seem a bit obsessed.quote:The second you actually answer if a misdemeanor is a crime.
What was wrong in the article I posted? Be specific……Of course you will not answer.
Posted on 11/30/25 at 3:51 pm to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
Youre fabricating this bullshite, and you know it
Did you read the order and the facts presented?
quote:
Proving that it could be compared to a cult is far far far from proving the child was hurt in any way.
Clearly you didn't read the order.
quote:
More lies.
The leader of the "Church" spoke about the details of their custody case not only in front of the child (a big no no in a custody suit) but in front of the entire congregation.
This was not in dispute.
quote:
Hurry, drop the decision into chat gap so you can act like you've read it
I literally posted it here and was the first to do so, apparently, to disprove the lies stated by the mother's lawyers (copied in the story in OP)
Posted on 11/30/25 at 3:53 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
You seem a bit obsessed.
I mean you are obsessively refusing to answer a question that you got wrong twice before.
Not to mention you have a pathological need to lie about it.
Still this is at least an admission that you have not answered that question.
Posted on 11/30/25 at 3:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:And this seems a good point at which to ask why the esteemed Western Journal (bastion of objective reporting) repeatedly-quoted the press release from the mother's lawyers, but apparently did not even contact the father's lawyers for comment and not once quoted the actual language of the Order.
disprove the lies stated by the mother's lawyers (copied in the story in OP)
Posted on 11/30/25 at 3:57 pm to Narax
quote:Narax, you have not asked me any questions.
I mean you are obsessively refusing to answer a question
Misdemeanors and felonies are both crimes, though most people tend to think first of felonies when the word "crime" is used.
Jaywalking and speeding are misdemeanors, but most folks don't think that they make one a "criminal."
This post was edited on 11/30/25 at 4:03 pm
Posted on 11/30/25 at 3:59 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Narax, you have not asked me any questions.
I think you are a rather decent liberal who makes effort to engage.
Welcome to the board!
Posted on 11/30/25 at 3:59 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
though most people tend to think first of felonies when the word "crime" is used.
Posted on 11/30/25 at 4:06 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Says the guy running from his statement that misdemeanors aren’t crimes.
I suppose I should be flattered by the fact I have two stalkers.
Scroll up, I clarified my point many times…..but you knew that.
Posted on 11/30/25 at 4:12 pm to Bama Mountain
quote:
I suppose I should be flattered by the fact I have two stalkers.
taking the very easy opportunity to point out just how ignorant you are doesn’t make us stalkers. It just means you’re ignorant. quote:
clarified my point many times
would be nothing to “clarify” if you weren’t a completely ignorant moron. Posted on 11/30/25 at 4:17 pm to Bama Mountain
quote:
Scroll up, I clarified my point many times…..but you knew that.
You clarified that you will declare you are right even when there is strong evidence that you are extremely wrong.
Only the dishonest get to that level of denial.
I'm guessing your day job is pretending to be a Nigerian Prince lol
Notice Relentless could easily answer the question and you still haven't.
Posted on 11/30/25 at 5:39 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Dad got this right and does not want mom taking the child to some snake-charmer evangelical cult.
Come on man, surely you don’t believe he’s right and the church is a snake handling cult?
You don’t have a personal beef with Jesus Christ like the girl’s Dad evidently does?
The Dad’s a monster risking irreparably harming his own daughter. He’s using her to inflict emotional, mental and spiritual duress on her mother under the subterfuge of being concerned for the child’s mental wellbeing. And, very likely destroying any chances for the three of them to have a halfway healthy family relationship in the process.
quote:
“ Then said he unto the disciples, It is impossible but that offences will come: but woe unto him, through whom they come!
It were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he cast into the sea, than that he should offend one of these little ones.“
Posted on 11/30/25 at 6:13 pm to L.A.
How many here who were exposed to the Christian Church ‘experience’ back when we were children, but have now developed beliefs based on our own independent life experience? Organizational ’church’ or not, or a personal one to one with Christ. Or non belief. Most I suspect. No damage incurred.
The teachings inherent in Jesus’s Gospel are not harmful but compassionate, and a good base to begin one’s psychological/spiritual life.
If a particular church or leader sucks, the kids will realize it sooner or later as they grow. But they will have heard the Gospel of love and mercy. That will stick.
Belief holds hope, and with no hope one becomes cynical and unhappy. Supposed ’Realism’ becomes Janis Joplin’s “freedom is just another word for nothing left to lose”. Few can happily bear the thought of an inevitable loss of all and live as a happy and uplifting citizen. Hope only can counter that spiritual poison.
This Judge’s Ruling is bs. “Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools”. Not unexpected though, as it all comes unglued, per the Prophetic narrative.
The teachings inherent in Jesus’s Gospel are not harmful but compassionate, and a good base to begin one’s psychological/spiritual life.
If a particular church or leader sucks, the kids will realize it sooner or later as they grow. But they will have heard the Gospel of love and mercy. That will stick.
Belief holds hope, and with no hope one becomes cynical and unhappy. Supposed ’Realism’ becomes Janis Joplin’s “freedom is just another word for nothing left to lose”. Few can happily bear the thought of an inevitable loss of all and live as a happy and uplifting citizen. Hope only can counter that spiritual poison.
This Judge’s Ruling is bs. “Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools”. Not unexpected though, as it all comes unglued, per the Prophetic narrative.
Posted on 11/30/25 at 6:48 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Calvinism is garbage.
You should read your Bible instead of having someone read it to you, but that can be said of catholic’s in general.
Page 8 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News