Started By
Message

re: Cost of GOP tax plan could exceed $2 trillion

Posted on 12/18/17 at 2:39 pm to
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
94746 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

Name me the last president that didn’t have 10 trillion in spending?


Pretty sure he meant $10T in deficit spending - and nobody ever had that. Not even close - that's all combined for all prior 43 Presidents. Impressive.
Posted by Capital Cajun
Over Yonder
Member since Aug 2007
5601 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 2:59 pm to
Part 2 has to happen an that I cutting spending.
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 3:10 pm to
Oh noz the gov with 2 trillion less of stolen money
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
26074 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 3:14 pm to
Correct me if I am wrong, but each time there have been significant tax cuts I believe tax monies collected were higher than before. Now if we are collecting more the cuts would not be the cause of higher deficits.
Posted by Lsuhoohoo
Member since Sep 2007
101918 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

Cost of GOP tax plan could exceed $2 trillion



The government spends 4 trillion dollars a year. Cut $200 billion out of that for 10 years. There, problem solved.
Posted by Aristo
Colorado
Member since Jan 2007
13292 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 3:26 pm to
Then tell your buddy the government to spend less. Cost more? More like they won't be taking more.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
112448 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 3:28 pm to
Obama's stimulus added almost $800 billion to the deficit every year (because it kept getting rolled into the subsequent CRs).

I don't recall a lot of wailing and gnashing of teeth about that from the Dems
Posted by Plx1776
Member since Oct 2017
18131 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 3:29 pm to
My prediction of a future quote that will probably be said this week.


"OMFG. How many people will DIE in the streets , if this tax bill passes? OMFG!. BILLIONS of people will die!!! "

-some dumbass democrat politician.

Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
15727 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

I'd ultimately try to figure out ways to make people self sufficient and not need government financial assistance at all.


Posted by 50_Tiger
Arlington TX
Member since Jan 2016
42920 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 3:44 pm to
Celtic, I am okay with that.

I’ve been begging to get out of SSec and Medicaid for everyone under 35.

I’ll never see that money
Posted by olgoi khorkhoi
priapism survivor
Member since May 2011
16327 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

cost



Taking someone’s money costs them. There is no cost involved when the money is returned.
Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
32432 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

The only way the trillion proposed giveaway to the rich works is to end medicare and social security for the young.


Works for me (I'm in my early 30s).
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
41750 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 4:11 pm to
So Obama raised the debt 10 trillion over 8 years, and that was "OK", but Trump might raise it 2 trillion more in ten years and it is "bad"????

Hmmmmmmmmmm
Posted by TigersFan64
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2014
4755 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 4:42 pm to
You know what else has never happened? Tax cuts spurring enough growth to offset the deficits caused by the tax cuts.

It

Has

Never

Happened

And please don't say Reagan, because he ended up having to raise taxes later on due to the deficits his tax cuts caused. And look what drastically cutting taxes in Kansas did for them. They are just now beginning to sort out the fricking fiscal mess that moron Sam Brownback left in his wake with his "trickle-down" economics bullshite.
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
65142 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

before factoring in economic growth.


lol. This is like saying “I had 100% A...before I took the first test and got an F.”
Posted by PointsInCase
Member since Dec 2009
698 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 5:08 pm to
quote:

Are liberals pretending to give a shite about spending now? Right on cue.
And conservatives suddenly don't care about the deficit, which has been a major concern of Republicans for quite some time. Both political parties suck. Don't believe the rhetoric. Neither party cares about the middle class.
Posted by PointsInCase
Member since Dec 2009
698 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 5:12 pm to
quote:

Lol. This is like saying “I had 100% A...before I took the first test and got an F.”
The article makes it clear that the tax reform will not pay for itself through economic growth per the analysis performed by a conservative leaning agency. This means that the increased taxes collected from the projected GDP growth will be lower than the cash outflows from the government, which means we will have to borrow more money.
Posted by PointsInCase
Member since Dec 2009
698 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

You know what else has never happened? Tax cuts spurring enough growth to offset the deficits caused by the tax cuts. It Has Never Happened And please don't say Reagan, because he ended up having to raise taxes later on due to the deficits his tax cuts caused. And look what drastically cutting taxes in Kansas did for them. They are just now beginning to sort out the fricking fiscal mess that moron Sam Brownback left in his wake with his "trickle-down" economics bullshite.
This is a theory you learn in Econ. 101 that supports lower taxes/free trade. It's theoretical and doesn't capture all of the realities of how markets behave in the real world. Yet, we have ardent believers that think lowering taxes will always pay for itself. Sure, this can happen. It can also not happen. It's a risky proposition.
This post was edited on 12/18/17 at 5:21 pm
Posted by TigersFan64
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2014
4755 posts
Posted on 12/19/17 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

This is a theory you learn in Econ. 101 that supports lower taxes/free trade. It's theoretical and doesn't capture all of the realities of how markets behave in the real world. Yet, we have ardent believers that think lowering taxes will always pay for itself. Sure, this can happen. It can also not happen. It's a risky proposition.


It sure didn't work with the G.W. Bush tax cuts, the tax cuts in Kansas under Brownback, or the tax cuts her in Louisiana under Jindal. All led to massive fiscal deficits. "Trickle down" is a crap theory basically designed to rationalize giving big tax cuts to the donor class. It never has given enough economic growth to offset the hole it blows in the budget.
Posted by Kickadawgitfeelsgood
Lafayette LA
Member since Nov 2005
14090 posts
Posted on 12/19/17 at 12:15 pm to
Even the most conservative projections brought forth by Republicans have it increasing the debt.

But hey! Let’s rally around “it could”.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram