Started By
Message

re: **CORRECTION** 40% of people being admitted to UK hospitals for COVID-19 are vaccinated

Posted on 7/20/21 at 7:28 am to
Posted by GeauxFightingTigers1
Member since Oct 2016
12574 posts
Posted on 7/20/21 at 7:28 am to
quote:

The main issue here is all the true believers are tripling down on the untested unproven vaccine, they will never admit there are a myriad of sound logical scidntific reasons to NOT get or WAIT to get the shot.

This is a simple risk vs benefit evaluation.


Yup. Even if one believes the jab works, it doesn't make sense for 90-95% of the population to even look at it. There simply isn't a reason for healthy people to take the chance unless one is obese, and have multiple medical issues... desperation might force them to consider it as an option.

They're mad now because they took the jab and they want more members of their stupid club... which might not help at all.
This post was edited on 7/20/21 at 7:29 am
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
48907 posts
Posted on 7/20/21 at 8:18 am to
This is a private medical decision, if it works then you're protected. But it doesn't work that's the problem
Posted by BayouBengal51
Forest Hill, Louisiana
Member since Nov 2006
6535 posts
Posted on 7/20/21 at 8:29 am to
quote:

About 60% of hospitalisations from COVID are not from double vaccinated people, rather 60% of hospitalisations from COVID are currently from unvaccinated people."


What an interesting way to say that 100 percent of the people hospitalized for Covid 19, were infected regardless of their vaccination status or not....

They need to quit calling this thing a vaccine and call it a Covid 19 symptom inhibitor. That is all it is doing when it "works".
This post was edited on 7/20/21 at 8:32 am
Posted by TigerVespamon
Member since Dec 2010
6062 posts
Posted on 7/20/21 at 6:26 pm to
quote:

What an interesting way to say that 100 percent of the people hospitalized for Covid 19, were infected regardless of their vaccination status
Posted by Triple Bogey
19th Green
Member since May 2017
5984 posts
Posted on 7/20/21 at 6:32 pm to


This whole frickin board right now.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
57932 posts
Posted on 7/20/21 at 6:34 pm to
Posted by Statestreet
Gueydan
Member since Sep 2008
12927 posts
Posted on 7/29/21 at 5:37 pm to
quote:

but I'm still waiting to learn of any actual downside to the vaccines.


huh… have you looked at VAERS?
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68199 posts
Posted on 7/29/21 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

 VAERS?
Tons of bullshite. Anyone can report some supposed event. With 163,000,000 people vaccinated, many of them elderly and unhealthy for a myriad of reasons, you would expect thousands of health events to occur in proximity to the time the vax was given. That would happen with or without a vaccine.
This post was edited on 7/29/21 at 5:55 pm
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162219 posts
Posted on 7/29/21 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

So its worse to be vaccinated

Depends on what vaccine it would appear

The 3 here are very beneficial
Posted by Padme
Member since Dec 2020
6161 posts
Posted on 7/29/21 at 6:20 pm to
quote:

That would happen with or without a vaccine.


So just conjecture? Quite the argument
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68199 posts
Posted on 7/29/21 at 6:27 pm to
quote:


So just conjecture? Quite the argument
That is exactly what many of the vaers reports are.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26206 posts
Posted on 7/29/21 at 6:31 pm to
quote:

Semantics, but “double vaccinated” implies being fully vaccinated twice (4 total shots). These people got one vaccination in 2 parts, right?


You are correct generally, but have to take the language with some context. The UK started off giving as many people as possible one shot due to the initial supply crunch, and then coming back and doing a second round when the vaccine supply caught up. Theory was/is that everyone getting one shot was better on aggregate than half the pop getting both.

With that specific context in mind, the semantics of how it’s being presented to Brits makes a little more sense
This post was edited on 7/29/21 at 6:32 pm
Posted by Padme
Member since Dec 2020
6161 posts
Posted on 7/29/21 at 6:46 pm to
Well with your logic you might say the majority of people that were said to have died from the chyna flu would have died anyway, with or without it, it works both ways
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89516 posts
Posted on 7/29/21 at 7:21 pm to
quote:

Could be. Could be something else. We can’t know because no one will be honest.



Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89516 posts
Posted on 7/29/21 at 7:30 pm to
quote:

I do root for it.


As do I - they've given these various experimental cocktails to hundreds of millions of human beings and many of those are my fellow American citizens.

The "pandemic" is going to be largely gone in a few weeks, but its legacy will remain. We will be "testing" for COVID well into 2022 and when the Alpha Alpha strain starts spreading in Lichtenstein, it may make news in 2023 even.

But if these vaccines have long-term harmful effects - even on a few percent of recipients, then that is going to affect millions. And millions who had no idea about that risk and no way of weighing that risk versus the risk of contracting one of the many variants of COVID (which they may have/may yet contract, anyway).

A crazy time and with poor leadership across the board, I don't have any good advice to offer anyone other than to not feel pressured to make a risk decision you can't live with. Whether you think you need the vaccine or you don't, you're probably right. Each carries a largely unknown risk at this point.

The only silver lining is that the medical folks in the trenches learn more every day on how to combat it if you do contract one of the virus strains. If only the policy makers had it in them to be transparent about data - about what they know and don't know, folks would be more inclined to follow their recommendations.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68199 posts
Posted on 7/29/21 at 7:42 pm to
quote:

Well with your logic you might say the majority of people that were said to have died from the chyna flu would have died anyway, with or without it, it works both ways
Yes. Correct.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
39262 posts
Posted on 7/29/21 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

So its worse to be vaccinated

You get Moron of the Night!
Almost everyone in the UK is vaccinated, including virtually all of the vulnerable. If the vaccine did no good whatsoever 98% of the people in hospitals would be vaccinated. Instead it’s only 40%. The vaccine is a miracle contraceptive.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
39262 posts
Posted on 7/29/21 at 8:37 pm to
quote:

And markets are tanking around the world as a result. Investors are screaming to the sky and literally renting their garments.

To whom?

Guys,

I’m a tried and true conservative. I laughed in the face of Covid, got it, and recovered easily as I knew I would. But I despair at the idiocy of many of you. The vaccine is clearly working. The analytical skills that led me to believe that covid was overblown have also led me to the conclusion that the vaccines (J&J, Moderna and Pfizer) are safe, effective at reducing the chance of infection, and effective at reducing the severity of symptoms.

It’s difficult to find a doctor who has not been vaccinated (Actually find one; not online). Trump led the vaccine development effort. He got vaccinated as soon as it was available. This is NOT a commie plot to sequester your bodily fluids. Jesus, is the small government cohort THIS stupid? If so there is no hope.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68199 posts
Posted on 7/29/21 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

. Jesus, is the small government cohort THIS stupid? 
They aren't small government. They keep waiting for FDA full approval which is one if the reasons pharmaceuticals take so long and cost billions to bring to market. What you have to recall is Trump brought in many supporters who would best fit in with 1970s Democrats. People who are pro America but also pro government handouts directed towards them. Not really conservative.
This post was edited on 7/29/21 at 9:48 pm
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68593 posts
Posted on 7/29/21 at 8:46 pm to
But muh 97%.

first pageprev pagePage 7 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram