Consistency on gay rights and what you like to watch

(no message)

Based on your most recent posts, imma pray for you Ralph

Stop fricking posting.

You wonder why you arse clown liberals get booted from this board.

Is the 30 cents per post really worth it?

quote:

---

You’re in a downward spiral.

---

Yup. It is an ugly thing to see but I cannot look away.

I like watching girl on girl pornography, in fact, prefer it over pornography where a man is present.

I do not support government sanctioned or regulated marriage in any form.

Government should have no say in who can and cannot get married, nor should they confer any benefits upon those who are married, nor should they require any record of that marriage for any purpose.

Marriage is a sacrament, a ceremony between two people and maybe a church if they belong to one. We should let people decide what "marriage" means to them while that definition has ZERO baring on government policy.

At the same time, we have to live in reality, where marital status is a big deal for ownership of property, custody of children, insurance benefits, inheritance, and taxation. For that reason, I actually liked the result of Obergafell, but I found the support for that outcome in the majority opinion sloppy, poorly founded in Constitutional precedent, and dangerously open-ended. While marriage seems to be, on its face, a 10th amendment issue, it is also an equal protection issue under the 14th Amendment, and a privileges and immunities clause issue. Just as slave states and free states created issues where a person could simply cross a state line and cease to be property of another person, similar issues where a legal marriage in one state was not recognized as valid in another created an obvious issue. Under the Constitution, U.S. citizens are entitled to the same privileges and immunities no matter who they are or what state they are in. For that reason, I was not troubled by the outcome.

However, the majority was really really sloppy in outlining their opinion. There was a lack of cited textual support. By the exact same logic pattern followed by the majority in Obergafell, as Scalia pointed out in his dissent, similar prohibitions on bigamy, polygamy, and incest could easily be overturned.

I dont care who sucks what cock

I want my taxes lowered, the federal government diminished, and America put first

Simple things me wants

Trump broke you.

You are a mess.

Most lesbians are not attractive.

You trolled too hard too fast. Slow down, actual commie.

Truth bombs all day.

quote:

---

being gay is a choice

---

It is. I can choose to be with any type of person I want. Just because I'm more attracted to one type of person than another does not make it any less of a choice.

By your logic, pedophiles don't choose to be pedophiles, and should therefore be given rights as well.

Maybe you should be consistent on whom you support.