- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Connecticut Judge Throws Out Election Results, Orders New Primary After Democrat Fraud
Posted on 11/2/23 at 10:03 am to GumboPot
Posted on 11/2/23 at 10:03 am to GumboPot
This is how EASY it is to cheat an election.
This is also an example of how easy it SHOULD be for the judicial system to throw out results and order a new election.
This is why the Democrats fight drop box monitoring, signature verification, banning unsolicited mail in ballots, election roll pruning, ballot harvesting, etc. They know most judges won't go there.
This is why Democrats fight tooth and nail against every single effort at establishing election integrity. There are so many court cases that would fully expose fraud if the evidence was allowed to be seen or harsh penalties were imposed for the destruction or refusal to produce chain of custody evidence, etc.
This is why, as soon as Dems had a single vote lead in the Senate, they began a day one push to abolish the filibuster, pack the Supreme Court, give Fed. Gov the power to takeover the drawing of State voting districts, etc.
And the sad thing is that the bulk of the Republican power base hasn't done squat to reel any of this in. Republicans seemingly have no political ground game outside of Trump.
This is also an example of how easy it SHOULD be for the judicial system to throw out results and order a new election.
This is why the Democrats fight drop box monitoring, signature verification, banning unsolicited mail in ballots, election roll pruning, ballot harvesting, etc. They know most judges won't go there.
This is why Democrats fight tooth and nail against every single effort at establishing election integrity. There are so many court cases that would fully expose fraud if the evidence was allowed to be seen or harsh penalties were imposed for the destruction or refusal to produce chain of custody evidence, etc.
This is why, as soon as Dems had a single vote lead in the Senate, they began a day one push to abolish the filibuster, pack the Supreme Court, give Fed. Gov the power to takeover the drawing of State voting districts, etc.
And the sad thing is that the bulk of the Republican power base hasn't done squat to reel any of this in. Republicans seemingly have no political ground game outside of Trump.
This post was edited on 11/2/23 at 10:04 am
Posted on 11/2/23 at 10:05 am to GumboPot
If the Dems are having to cheat in their own primaries in solid blue areas… how the frick are they winning purple states without doing the same thing?
Posted on 11/2/23 at 10:07 am to teke184
Missing from the story was how the DA had convened a grand jury or filed charges against the fraudsters.
Oh that's right................
Oh that's right................
Posted on 11/2/23 at 10:13 am to GumboPot
This just can't be. Refuse to believe that something like this could happen in the highly educated, sophisticated, fair Northeast.
Haven't we been told over and over that whatever fraud might've taken place it was not enough to decide an election. See Bill Barr.
Seems to be an established narrative now by even many on the Right, but strictly for political purposes.
It's devolved into a curious sliding scale of self-serving rationalizing which soft peddles lesser fraud, but which also ends up looking the other way on lots of fraud.
Would over 70,000 illegitimate names on a city's voter rolls qualify as "lesser fraud" or "lots of fraud."
New Governor Landry has placed Orleans on his list of things to do. He mentioned that crime here needs to be addressed.
Wonder if any of it involves our embarrassing voter rolls, and Registrar Sandra Wilson.
Haven't we been told over and over that whatever fraud might've taken place it was not enough to decide an election. See Bill Barr.
Seems to be an established narrative now by even many on the Right, but strictly for political purposes.
It's devolved into a curious sliding scale of self-serving rationalizing which soft peddles lesser fraud, but which also ends up looking the other way on lots of fraud.
Would over 70,000 illegitimate names on a city's voter rolls qualify as "lesser fraud" or "lots of fraud."
New Governor Landry has placed Orleans on his list of things to do. He mentioned that crime here needs to be addressed.
Wonder if any of it involves our embarrassing voter rolls, and Registrar Sandra Wilson.
Posted on 11/2/23 at 11:01 am to longtooth
quote:AGAIN, Connecticut statutory law specifically provides for a new election in specific cases of election fraud. Connecticut General Statutes 9-329a.
This is how EASY it is to cheat an election.
This is also an example of how easy it SHOULD be for the judicial system to throw out results and order a new election.
THAT is why they can hold a new election. No similar statute allowed for new federal elections in 2020.
Posted on 11/2/23 at 11:04 am to Antoninus
quote:
THAT is why they can hold a new election. No similar statute allowed for new federal elections in 2020.
Hey Bootlicker, you gonna pretend the Democrats give a FK about existing Laws and or precedent?
Democrats violated THEIR OWN LAWS to make sure and "get Trump" in 2020.
Obvious partisan shill is obvious....

Posted on 11/2/23 at 11:32 am to WinnPtiger
quote:
beaux duke
Registered on: 10/11/2023
Another election season alter has manifested onto existence.
This place is predictably cyclical.
Posted on 11/2/23 at 11:47 am to GumboPot
Charlie Kirk just played some vids of the Dims stuffing ballots in Connecticut Dim primary where the judge determined the election was null and void.....I saw the same type of vids in 2000 Mules and the judges and courts didn't care, wonder why? 

Posted on 11/2/23 at 11:49 am to GumboPot
Voter fraud exposed in court? New elections scheduled?
Good! Throw their arse in jail. That's how it's supposed to work.
You have to have actual evidence, however, to make things like this happen.
Good! Throw their arse in jail. That's how it's supposed to work.
You have to have actual evidence, however, to make things like this happen.
Posted on 11/2/23 at 11:50 am to Bass Tiger
quote:
I saw the same type of vids in 2000 Mules and the judges and courts didn't care, wonder why?
Which judge in which court saw 2000 Mules presented as evidence in a trial / case?
Posted on 11/2/23 at 12:18 pm to Antoninus
I wasn't necessarily speaking about Federal elections, because it appears the Dem election mafia cheat at every level of government. But I'm certain that there are mechanisms to overturn fraud, cheating and other violations in federal elections. Especially if a politically motivated judge or Governor overturns established state election laws voted on by the people.
Posted on 11/2/23 at 12:31 pm to TigerAxeOK
quote:
Another election season alter has manifested onto existence.
This place is predictably cyclical.
No new posters allowed I guess.
Posted on 11/2/23 at 12:33 pm to omegaman66
quote:
No new posters allowed I guess.
It doesn't take a genius to figure out who some of these alters really are.
They are generally too stupid or mentally ill to effectively disguise themselves.
Posted on 11/2/23 at 12:48 pm to omegaman66
quote:
No new posters allowed I guess.
There are undoubtedly alters but there are almost just as many who like to cry wolf.
Posted on 11/2/23 at 12:55 pm to GumboPot
Voter fraud is treason, and should be punished accordingly.
Popular
Back to top
