- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Comey’s dramatic account on Trump rocks Washington- Katie Williams of The Hill
Posted on 6/7/17 at 10:32 pm to mmcgrath
Posted on 6/7/17 at 10:32 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
Imagine if Obama had private meetings with Comey where he asked Comey to let the Clinton email investigation go.
You mean like the head of the DOJ meeting Bill Clinton on a tarmac while the Hillary investigation raged on? Gtfo
1
Posted on 6/7/17 at 10:32 pm to fouldeliverer
quote:
Comey acknowledged that he did not take such notes about his meetings with former President Barack Obama
Nothing to see there, folks.
Posted on 6/7/17 at 10:33 pm to fouldeliverer
Bill Clinton on the tarmac with Loretta Lynch and her exoneration within 2 week by Comey is a much better way to handle these matters
Posted on 6/7/17 at 10:33 pm to AUstar
Comey met Obama 2 times
That's so fricking weak
That's so fricking weak
Posted on 6/7/17 at 10:33 pm to fouldeliverer
Posted on 6/7/17 at 10:34 pm to fouldeliverer
quote:
The President shouldn't be having nine one on one meetings with the head of the FBI.
Do you know how many one on one meetings Barry had with Al Sharpton? Too many.
This post was edited on 6/7/17 at 10:34 pm
Posted on 6/7/17 at 10:34 pm to rds dc
quote:
The new spin is already out - Trump may have not #Russians but this statement proves he is imature, ignorant of long standing protocols, and just generally not fit to be president.
It isn't spin, it's my interpretation of events and what seems to be the most logical conclusion. I have no reason to spin anything. I'm not a political pundit on television.
Posted on 6/7/17 at 10:34 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:Maybe Obama wasn't the huge corrupt guy you make him out to be.
Imagine if the MSM obsessed over every decision and action of President Obama and provided a degree of scrutiny to them. What a world we would have had.
Posted on 6/7/17 at 10:34 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
Imagine if Obama had private meetings with Comey where he asked Comey to let the Clinton email investigation go.
Maybe he did? We don't know. The Deep State and MSM worked in tandem to keep any potential Obama Admin gossip under wraps. And guess what, just like Trump, Obama could've done that and it would not have been obstruction of justice.
Posted on 6/7/17 at 10:35 pm to Rakim
quote:
Bill Clinton on the tarmac with Loretta Lynch and her exoneration within 2 week by Comey is a much better way to handle these matters
Which was fricked up.
Thanks for proving my point about whataboutism though.
Posted on 6/7/17 at 10:35 pm to fouldeliverer
You sound like a bitch
Posted on 6/7/17 at 10:35 pm to Strannix
quote:
Nice melt, a little long for my taste
In other words, I can't rebut this.
Posted on 6/7/17 at 10:36 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
Imagine if Obama had private meetings with Comey where he asked Comey to let the Clinton email investigation go.
I'm pretty sure that DID happen, actually. If not with Comey, then we KNOW it happened with Lynch. Do you think Lynch met Clinton on the tarmac without Obama's knowledge?
Posted on 6/7/17 at 10:37 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
Imagine if Obama had private meetings with Comey where he asked Comey to let the Clinton email investigation go.
Exactly. Hell just imagine the conspiratorial posts on here if he was met with Comey alone nine times in one month. The hypocrisy is astounding.
Posted on 6/7/17 at 10:37 pm to fouldeliverer
quote:
Why can't we analyze acts in isolation, what is this boards obsession with whataboutism?
Because none of you fricks called Barry out for his shite but have an obsession for "transparency" all of a sudden.
This post was edited on 6/7/17 at 10:39 pm
Posted on 6/7/17 at 10:38 pm to bamafan1001
quote:
You sound like a bitch
God I love this. You sound like you aren't intelligent or informed enough to debate back.
Posted on 6/7/17 at 10:41 pm to fouldeliverer
quote:
Why can't we analyze acts in isolation, what is this boards obsession with whataboutism?
What does that have to do with this incident? We can analyze Trump's actions without referring to Clinton or Obama. Why are people on here incapable of doing that?
Nobody thinks it was smart. Truth is there is zero laws that were broken. The President has not surrendered any of his civil liberties and can in fact ask if Comey can give Flynn a break. What have you found that's illegal or suggest Trump colluded with Russia?
What laws have been broken?
This post was edited on 6/7/17 at 11:09 pm
Posted on 6/7/17 at 10:44 pm to stout
quote:
Because none of you fricks called Barry out for his shite but have a obsession for "transparency" all of a sudden.
Obama's hypocrisy was shameful. And the liberal media even wrote about it. President Obama promised transparency and open government. He failed miserably. So why do Washington watchdog groups look the other way?
I have called him out numerous times and it is ignored. I can link numerous posts of my criticisms of Obama and CLinton. It doesn't matter, I'm still called a liberal hack or Obamabot. When I insist I am a moderate who typically votes for GOP, people say shut up no one cares.
Regardless, the tactic is one of derailment it shifts the conversation so you and others don't have to debate the substance of what I posted. It is a common propaganda technique. Putin utilizes it beautifully, see the Megyn Kelly interview.
Posted on 6/7/17 at 10:46 pm to John McClane
quote:
Nice non-answer. In your OP you basically admit it isn't obstruction, then won't commit to that same opinion once it is pointed out that the rest doesn't matter
What are you reading?
quote:
All of this, though perhaps not criminal obstruction is rather damning.
How is perhaps not criminal obstruction basically admitting it isn't obstruction?
Posted on 6/7/17 at 10:48 pm to fouldeliverer
quote:
In other words, I can't rebut this.
It's so asininely childish it doesn't rate a response, goodnight sir
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News