- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Columnist Sean Davis Calls on Republicans to Start Creating Lists of Democrats to Prosecut
Posted on 5/31/24 at 4:04 am to DawginSC
Posted on 5/31/24 at 4:04 am to DawginSC
quote:
The problem with this sort of thing is you actually need evidence for it to work. While regular people believe accusations pretty easily, courts require you to actually have evidence. We see this with a lot of the court cases and third party investigations that have been instigated by GOP politicians recently. All the election fraud lawsuits were dismissed because there wasn't any evidence. The accusations about Hillary were dismissed by investigators. Same is true for Biden investigations.that were centered around his son. The last investigation by a special prosecutor or politically motivated trial that actually found a democrat to have done something wrong was the investigation of Bill Clinton. And that wasn't even a crime related to what was being investigated, but rather the fact Clinton lied about an affair that happened after the investigation began while under oath... because he didn't want to publicly admit to cheating on his wife. GOP politicians are under the false belief that a BELIEF that something illegal happened is enough. It isn't. You have to find evidence that will hold up in court. And they haven't been able to do that. Trying to "get even" with democrats won't work unless you have evidence that can be used to convict them. I don't know why they haven't figured this out yet. Trump is a convicted felon not because "democrats went after him". He's a convicted felon because "democrats went after him WITH RECEIPTS".
ok Groomer
Posted on 5/31/24 at 4:20 am to BCreed1
Making lists sounds like a good way for conservatives to get arrested on made up charges.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 4:26 am to Sofaking2
quote:
Making lists sounds like a good way for conservatives to get arrested on made up charges.
Would it be made up?
Trying to press criminal charges against someone without evidence is generally going to get a prosecutor fired, disbarred or sent to jail depending on what lines they cross.
What allowed prosecutors to go after Trump is the fact they had evidence of a crime. It was enough for a jury to find Trump guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 4:28 am to DawginSC
quote:
He's a convicted felon because "democrats went after him WITH RECEIPTS".
Bull fricking shite. They didn’t even state an actual crime. They had to piecemeal dead accusations together then completely change the voting structure of the jury so they didn’t have to agree on what charges they felt like Trump had violated in any combination. They didn’t even let experts testify for the defense. I hope you’re railroaded in a similar fashion one day.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 4:31 am to DawginSC
Exactly you make my point. Anyone who writes down a list of people on paper would go to jail in your America. Any and all conservatives would spend time in jail for supporting Trump. You absolutely would be in favor of me going to jail for voting or supporting Trump. I have zero doubt. There is no line Dems and you won’t cross. Political disagreement would be criminalized.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 4:37 am to Sofaking2
quote:
Exactly you make my point. Anyone who writes down a list of people on paper would go to jail in your America. Any and all conservatives would spend time in jail for supporting Trump. You absolutely would be in favor of me going to jail for voting or supporting Trump. I have zero doubt. There is no line Dems and you won’t cross. Political disagreement would be criminalized.
Not sure how you get that from my post.
To "go after democrats through prosecution", a prosecutor needs evidence.
The same is true to go after republicans through prosecution.
If you have evidence, you can do so. If you don't, and you try to do so, that prosecutor is going to get fired, get disbarred or go to jail. That's true if they're going after a political enemy or just trying to prosecute an average person.
You need evidence.
I support any prosecutor with sufficient evidence bringing anyone to trial based on that evidence, regardless of the politics of the victim.
But if you were to do that without evidence, it would in fact be a crime based on the laws of our nation. You can't make criminal charges against someone without evidence as a prosecutor. That is illegal.
You have to understand that what's made the various indictments against Trump possible is that all of those prosecutors had enough evidence to bring charges. In the case of this trial, they had enough evidence to get a jury to convict.
It's not about the prosecutors being brave. They simply need evidence to take action. Trump gave that to them.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 4:52 am to DawginSC
quote:
No evidence = no case.
As for Hillary, nobody (not even Trump's justice department) has ever charged her with a crime. She was investigated by Trump's justice department and they found nothing to charge her with.
Why?
No evidence.
However there is a lot of "evidence" that you are yet another useful idiot for Pedo Joe (Hussien Obama heavy on the Hussien, DEMOCRATS) to continue wrecking America. If you can't see the difference between what's being done to DJT and what's not being done to your scum bags real criminals on your side then you are an idiot or know better and scum like them.
Your little feable "evidence" post has done nothing but expose who you are.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 4:58 am to Carbonman
quote:
Your little feable "evidence" post has done nothing but expose who you are.
It’s an SFP alter.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 4:58 am to Carbonman
quote:
However there is a lot of "evidence" that you are yet another useful idiot for Pedo Joe (Hussien Obama heavy on the Hussien, DEMOCRATS) to continue wrecking America. If you can't see the difference between what's being done to DJT and what's not being done to your scum bags real criminals on your side then you are an idiot or know better and scum like them.
Your little feable "evidence" post has done nothing but expose who you are.
Our country is base don the rule of law.
To be found to be in violation of a law, there needs to be evidence.
The fact you seem to want legal action without evidence of criminal activity that warrants a trial indicates that you are against the idea of the rule of law.
I disagree with tossing the rule of law out the window.
Yes, I realize demanding evidence for criminal charges does expose me for what I am.
That outs me as someone who believes in the rule of law in the US. I'm not ashamed of that. I'm proud of it. Why would I be on the side of criminal activity (which includes charging people with crimes without evidence)?
Posted on 5/31/24 at 4:59 am to DawginSC
quote:
I disagree with tossing the rule of law out the window.
You’re just mouthing words. Go back to Reddit and your useless existence.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 5:04 am to BCreed1
All 51 intel chiefs that said that Hunter's laptop had "all the hallmarks of Russina disinformation", when there were at least 2 witness with proof that it wasn't should be prosecuted for fraud with intent to interfere in an election.
Then, since Biden used that letter in the campaign, pursue him for the same with the added charge of campaign finance violations, 51 counts by the way, because every one of those signatures is an in-kind contribution.
Looking at you TX and FL. The fraud was committed on all of us, the people, that includes the people of your state.
Throw in a couple fed enhancements if your TX because minorities were disproportionately affected in your state (Biden hates black people and the poors) by Biden's border policies that were a direct result of him being elected due to that fraud. Oh, and while you're at it copy Fani in GA and tack on at violation of oath of office for those same border policies.
Then, since Biden used that letter in the campaign, pursue him for the same with the added charge of campaign finance violations, 51 counts by the way, because every one of those signatures is an in-kind contribution.
Looking at you TX and FL. The fraud was committed on all of us, the people, that includes the people of your state.
Throw in a couple fed enhancements if your TX because minorities were disproportionately affected in your state (Biden hates black people and the poors) by Biden's border policies that were a direct result of him being elected due to that fraud. Oh, and while you're at it copy Fani in GA and tack on at violation of oath of office for those same border policies.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 5:13 am to I20goon
What they want is selective prosecution. And dumb New York juries.willing to accept "evidence" of, let us say, a highly creative nature.
Very Soviet approach.
Very Soviet approach.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 5:14 am to the808bass
quote:
You’re just mouthing words. Go back to Reddit and your useless existence.
I'm typing words, not mouthing them.
And believing evidence is useless is really stupid. It's quite important in court cases. I feel like that's something you should learn.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 5:20 am to DawginSC
quote:
And believing evidence is useless is really stupid.
This is mouthing words that have been given to you. You’re the dummy and the media is the ventriloquist.
You’re repeating pablum that you think makes your partisan political argument. There’s no underlying there there. You making another post about “the importance of evidence” won’t change that. And you’re too dumb to even understand any of this.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 5:37 am to the808bass
quote:
There’s no underlying there there.
The jury disagrees with you.
They heard the evidence presented by the prosecution and they decided there in fact was a there there.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 5:45 am to HailToTheChiz
quote:
Meh I'd rather let the pendulum lie here until November
This is why the GOP and America will continue to lose
No, I think Sir Winston has a point here. An outrage has been committed. It is five months until the election. Let the outrage build; fan it. Striking back legally would be justified, and satisfying, but it would be a relief valve.
Sir Winston said “until November”. Yeah, THAT’s the time to strike in our state courts, and February is when we strike in Federal courts.
Have you watched the Godfather? When Sonny was killed Michael did not strike out in anger. He planned and waited. Those are very different circumstances, to be sure, but not going off half cocked is the message. Note, that this is what the Democrats did. They could have brought this case a long time ago, but it’s effect would have been less and maybe negative. They planned and plotted.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 5:53 am to DawginSC
quote:
The jury disagrees with you.
So?
quote:
They heard the evidence presented by the prosecution and they decided there in fact was a there there.
They aren’t arbiters of truth in any sense other than the legal result of this case at this point. Their determination means almost zero when it comes to what is actually true. I’m not a “reality by consensus” kind of person. Which means I’m definitely not a “reality by a court decision” kind of person. None of this will make sense to you because you’re retarded.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 5:58 am to SirWinston
quote:
Meh I'd rather let the pendulum lie here until November
“We gotta show decorum and be the bigger party”
Every spineless republican who watches the democrats take, take, take, take, take, take, take, take, take, take, take………….
Posted on 5/31/24 at 6:02 am to HailToTheChiz
agreed.
I am forced to watch morning news on CBS. They aere having a jizz fest in full glory.
I am forced to watch morning news on CBS. They aere having a jizz fest in full glory.
Popular
Back to top


0





