- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
DawginSC
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 7728 |
| Registered on: | 8/16/2022 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: If Georgia could only play their graduates/graduating and non criminals
Posted by DawginSC on 12/15/25 at 4:43 pm to Vulcan Materials
Fans like you don't realize that this isn't a critique of Kirby Smart's teams... it's actually a critique of Mark Richt's teams. That's how dated the graduation information is when it gets released.
The last release we had included only one class Kirby Smart recruited... his very first class which was mostly chosen by Mark Richt that Smart just held onto after being hired.
The last release we had included only one class Kirby Smart recruited... his very first class which was mostly chosen by Mark Richt that Smart just held onto after being hired.
paper towels, paper plates and Febreze air freshener products
Seriously?
We think the players were intentionally trying to scam THESE items from a walmart by not scanning them properly on purpose?
What is that... maybe at most 30-40 bucks worth of stuff? That's only if you get the really pricey paper towels, paper plates and an economy jug of Febreze.
I think this can be filed under "stupid kid mistake" and move on.
Seriously?
We think the players were intentionally trying to scam THESE items from a walmart by not scanning them properly on purpose?
What is that... maybe at most 30-40 bucks worth of stuff? That's only if you get the really pricey paper towels, paper plates and an economy jug of Febreze.
I think this can be filed under "stupid kid mistake" and move on.
It's funny watching a ND fan talk about A&M's schedule as being about the same or slightly worse than ND's while forgetting two things.
First... A&M went 11-1 against their schedule while ND went 10-2.
Second... A&M defeated ND head to head.
ND would have been in the playoff if they were 11-1. They're not.
You play a weak arse schedule, you don't get in if you're a bubble team at 10-2.
First... A&M went 11-1 against their schedule while ND went 10-2.
Second... A&M defeated ND head to head.
ND would have been in the playoff if they were 11-1. They're not.
You play a weak arse schedule, you don't get in if you're a bubble team at 10-2.
quote:
Was pointing out both were at a 50% rate after year two. You seemed to want to make it sound like Saban was at 82% and KD is at 50% at their same time frame at Alabama.
My post was made in response to a post that stated that Bama fans hadn't seen much of a dropoff with Deboer.
If you want to keep trying to support that idea... you're welcome to. But few others will jump on that wagon with you.
Deboer is a pretty good coach. But you're not going to convince anyone that there hasn't been a dropoff from saban. There's been a pretty large dropoff even though Bama got into the playoff with a 9-seed in Deboer's second year.
re: Name any instance ever in CF where a head coach willingly leaves for a worse job/program
Posted by DawginSC on 12/13/25 at 4:42 pm to CalicoLSU1980
Jimbo leaving FSU for A&M
Kelly leaving ND for LSU
Riley leaving OU for SC (though some might argue they're equal)
Fran leaving Bama for A&M
R. Rod leaving Bama for WVU (though he didn't actually coach at Bama)
Probably many more.
Kelly leaving ND for LSU
Riley leaving OU for SC (though some might argue they're equal)
Fran leaving Bama for A&M
R. Rod leaving Bama for WVU (though he didn't actually coach at Bama)
Probably many more.
Who drops to the second list without Baseball included.
Let's be honest... there's really a big 1 and a half sports.
Football is big.
MBB is in the middle.
But it's a stretch to call baseball a big sport. I doubt any college baseball teams have profit of 7 figures a year at any school.
Let's be honest... there's really a big 1 and a half sports.
Football is big.
MBB is in the middle.
But it's a stretch to call baseball a big sport. I doubt any college baseball teams have profit of 7 figures a year at any school.
quote:
So Saban’s second year at Alabama he would have been in the 12 team playoffs? So that would be a 50% rate right?
Yes. After being hired following a losing season in 2006, Saban would have taken his team to a 4 team playoff once in his first two seasons
Deboer after being hired following a season in which Bama won the SEC and made a 4 team playoff... has made the 12 team playoff once.
Do you honestly view those as "about the same start?" Or can you just admit there's been a noticeable dropoff from Saban's performance?
re: The first sign of Alabama’s fall to mediocrity
Posted by DawginSC on 12/13/25 at 3:25 pm to Shaft Williams
quote:
The Shula years aren't representative of us as a program. When we aren't on probation 9-10 wins and top recruiting classes are a given.
No, they're not representative of Bama as a program. But a floor means what Bama is with the worst possible coach... not a mid-level guy.
Do you believe your performance the last two years with your pick from amongst the worst Bama coaches ever would be 9-4 in 2024 and 10-3 so far in 2025? Because I can think of at least 6 guys who coached SEC teams this year that would have coached bama to a worse record than that the last couple of years.
re: The first sign of Alabama’s fall to mediocrity
Posted by DawginSC on 12/13/25 at 3:15 pm to Shaft Williams
quote:
Bama isn't mediocre under KD. Rather, KD has Bama playing at our floor. He hasn't elevated the program.
You have a floor below Deboer. Do you honestly think Mike Shula would have won 2 of 3 against UGA the past 2 seasons?
quote:
Bama is in the playoffs.
Not much of a dropoff if we are being honest.
First of all... I want to state that I think Deboer was a very good hire....
but this statement isn't realistic.
Bama missed the playoffs last year and made it as the #9 seed this year in a 12 team playoff.
The number of times under Saban where Bama wouldn't have finished the regular season in 10th place or higher (which today pretty much locks up a playoff spot)?
Three times. His first season, 2010 and 2019. An 82% rate of making a 12 team playoff is a lot better than a 50% rate. Deboer is good, but EVERYONE would be a significant dropoff from Saban and Deboer has only been good... not great.
quote:
There was a recent time when AL just named who they wanted and that man dropped whatever and whoever and ran to AL.
This has never been true.
Some coaches can't be hired away as long as their current employer is willing to match offers.
No college job was hiring Steve Spurrier away from Florida when he coached there. I'm sure Bama asked when they hired Mike Dubose. Wasn't achievable.
Same was true for Bobby Bowden when FSU was willing to match offers. Teams tried.
I'd say the same holds true for Kirby Smart at UGA. As long as UGA is willing to match any offer, it's unlikely Kirby would go anywhere.
And if you actually look at the Bama coaching searches, it's fair to look back and question if most of them were "first choices".
Was Deboer? Probably... but did they ask Smart just to be sure he was off the board?
Was Saban? No, he wasn't. Rich Rodriguez was who they initially hired. RRod backed out and stayed with WVU (though he later left his alma mater for Michigan).
Shula definitely wasn't their first choice. They were dealing with heavy sanctions.
Price? Nope. Mike Riley turned down the job. Same probation/sanction issues as Shula.
Franchione? Reportedly Frank Beamer was their first choice, but didn't want to leave his Alma Mater (VT).
Dubose? Many think Bama didn't want to hire him but there was pressure from fans and possibly Stallings.
Stallings? Nope, Bobby Bowden was choice 1. Bama's board of trustees voted to hire him 14-1 but his contract buyout scared off Bama's President.
Curry might have been the University's choice, but the fans hated the hire.
We really might have to go back to Perkins following Bear to have the first time Bama got their first choice for head coach unless they didn't bother to call Kirby when they hired Deboer.
I think your premise is flawed.
quote:
I don't recall any of that. If you can link to a quote that'd be great.
What I do recall is that enough people felt Drink calling the plays was a problem.
I'm not one of those guys who saves stuff on message boards off to ding people later. But I do remember threads hyping Kirby and when I opened them (thinking they were talking about Kirby Smart) they were instead about Kirby Moore.
I likely wouldn't have noticed if his name had been different.
I'm amused by this thread because a year or two ago I remember you guys being excited about Kirby Moore and talking about him one day being as good a coach as Kirby Smart (simply because of their names I guess).
Amazing how things change, huh?
Amazing how things change, huh?
quote:
Listen to this guy, if anyone knows what a cowardly, chickenshit schedule its UGA fans. They are experts on pussy schedules.
Funny, since UGA has scheduled more P4/P5 OOC games since the NCAA went to 12 regular season games than any other SEC team.
UGA actually schedules the TOUGHEST OOC schedules in the SEC.
re: Notre Dame schedule and what people dont understand.
Posted by DawginSC on 12/13/25 at 6:14 am to RelentlessTide
ND should just join the ACC.
They already played 6 ACC teams this year. One of their rivals (Stanford) is in the ACC.
Join the ACC. Stanford is a permanent opponent.
USC is a permanent OOC opponent.
This year they could play A&M and Navy OOC
Drop Purdue, Arkansas and Boise State.
Add 3 ACC games.
Schedule is not meaningfully different. Then you can win the ACC and get a slot.
And please don't try to pretend that games against Arkansas, Boise State or Purdue are important.
ND has played Purdue 3 times in the last decade with their current scheduling freedom. They aren't an important rival.
They already played 6 ACC teams this year. One of their rivals (Stanford) is in the ACC.
Join the ACC. Stanford is a permanent opponent.
USC is a permanent OOC opponent.
This year they could play A&M and Navy OOC
Drop Purdue, Arkansas and Boise State.
Add 3 ACC games.
Schedule is not meaningfully different. Then you can win the ACC and get a slot.
And please don't try to pretend that games against Arkansas, Boise State or Purdue are important.
ND has played Purdue 3 times in the last decade with their current scheduling freedom. They aren't an important rival.
quote:
Cignetti had proven that's it's not all about talent composite from an ON3 rankings site but rather excellence scouting to fit scheme and a damn good coach who much like Saban hunts out any player that lets their guard down and becomes complacent.
No he hasn't. Not yet.
Plenty of minor conference teams have upset highly talented opponents in an early season matchup or a bowl game.
The key point is those are one-off games, not a grind against a difficult schedule.
Indiana beating Oregon midway through the season and then OSU late in the season is impressive... but it's not a stretch of tough games.
Their toughest 3 game stretch this year was Illinois/Iowa/Oregon. Two 8-4 teams and then an 11-1 opponent. 64th in team talent, 42nd in team talent then 5th.
These are one-off type games. In the playoff they'll likely have to play 3 games in a row against teams with top 15 talent. They could play #2 (Bama), then #5 (Oregon) then #1 (UGA) or #3 (OSU) in consecutive weeks.
That's where a lack of talent on your roster kills you. That's why things like the Blue Chip ratio exist. All the national champions we've had in recent memory have had more 4-5 star players then 3-star or less players on their roster.
This year the lowest ranked team in the talent composite who's at 50% or higher is ranked 18th. So if you're not in the top 18 this year... you don't have the talent needed to win a national title.
Cignetti can disprove that by winning a national title. Making the playoff and even winning 1-2 games won't prove it. A team below 50% in blue chips has to actually win a championship.
quote:
And with 9 games you can't have a balance in home and away games. 5-4 at best
Actually, UGA finally gets balance in home and away games by expanding to 9 conference games.
4 games at home
4 games at the opponent's place
1 game in Jacksonville.
re: Notre Dame didn't even belong in the playoffs last year
Posted by DawginSC on 12/13/25 at 5:34 am to Simple Solution
I agree.
But ND nearly won the playoff last year because they had enough team talent that if they got hot in the playoff they could win.
Getting into the playoff is a very different thing that being able to win it. Indiana absolutely deserves to be in the playoff... but in my opinion they have ZERO chance of winning the whole thing. They just don't have the Jimmies and Joes to do it on their roster. They're something like 72nd in composite team talent.
The teams in the mix this year who have enough talent to win the whole thing are:
UGA (1st overall in talent composite)
Alabama (2nd)
OSU (3rd)
Oregon (5th)
A&M (8th)
OU (14th)
Miami (15tth).
I don't think any of the other teams has the depth of talent to win 3-4 games against playoff caliber teams.
Last year the final 4 teams were ranked 3rd (OSU), 4th (Texas), 9th (ND) and 11th (PSU)
But ND nearly won the playoff last year because they had enough team talent that if they got hot in the playoff they could win.
Getting into the playoff is a very different thing that being able to win it. Indiana absolutely deserves to be in the playoff... but in my opinion they have ZERO chance of winning the whole thing. They just don't have the Jimmies and Joes to do it on their roster. They're something like 72nd in composite team talent.
The teams in the mix this year who have enough talent to win the whole thing are:
UGA (1st overall in talent composite)
Alabama (2nd)
OSU (3rd)
Oregon (5th)
A&M (8th)
OU (14th)
Miami (15tth).
I don't think any of the other teams has the depth of talent to win 3-4 games against playoff caliber teams.
Last year the final 4 teams were ranked 3rd (OSU), 4th (Texas), 9th (ND) and 11th (PSU)
re: No troll or hate here just actually curious...
Posted by DawginSC on 12/13/25 at 5:28 am to JackieTreehorn
quote:
Why are the Yankees a better job than the Rays?
Not a great comparison. The yankess have more than double the payroll as the Rays do. Yankees and Rays are more like comparing Bama and West Virginia.
People underestimate the importance of "brand name" in college football.
Players are drawn to Bama simply because of their brand. LSU has some of that too, but not to the level that Alabama has.
In the end, it's easier to win (and thus a better job) at a place where it's easier to have more talent on your team. Right now there's no place where it's easier to convince talent to come to than Alabama.
There may be teams with more talent... UGA has a lot of talent. But I think that's more a factor of Kirby Smart being an elite recruiter than UGA being a better draw than Alabama (not that UGA is chopped liver in that area... Bama is just better).
Players are drawn to Bama simply because of their brand. LSU has some of that too, but not to the level that Alabama has.
In the end, it's easier to win (and thus a better job) at a place where it's easier to have more talent on your team. Right now there's no place where it's easier to convince talent to come to than Alabama.
There may be teams with more talent... UGA has a lot of talent. But I think that's more a factor of Kirby Smart being an elite recruiter than UGA being a better draw than Alabama (not that UGA is chopped liver in that area... Bama is just better).
re: Holy shite UGA got the biggest cupcake schedule
Posted by DawginSC on 12/12/25 at 12:53 pm to Aggie in TN
I find the whole outrage over not playing A&M rather amusing.
Does anyone really think UGA has been hurt by that?
I mean it would make sense to not match up Bama or Ole Miss against UGA again or add OU to UGA's schedule and instead have a game vs A&M... but is that any harder?
I mean A&M over their time in the SEC has been about the same as Ole Miss and worse than Bama or OU.
Does anyone really think UGA has been hurt by that?
I mean it would make sense to not match up Bama or Ole Miss against UGA again or add OU to UGA's schedule and instead have a game vs A&M... but is that any harder?
I mean A&M over their time in the SEC has been about the same as Ole Miss and worse than Bama or OU.
Popular
1











