- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
DawginSC
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 7824 |
| Registered on: | 8/16/2022 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: This disgusts me to say, but Kirby Smart will be the GOAT.
Posted by DawginSC on 1/1/26 at 9:01 pm to dawgfan24348
What Smart will likely do is make the playoff 9 times in each decade. The only year so far at UGA he wouldn't have made a 12 team playoff was his first at UGA.
I think while he won't win near the percentage of championships per year coaching that Saban did at Bama, he'll likely get 1-3 NC's each decade he coaches simply by making the field with talented teams every year.
It may not be this year... but it might. And when UGA is in that spot every year... they'll win every now and then.
I think while he won't win near the percentage of championships per year coaching that Saban did at Bama, he'll likely get 1-3 NC's each decade he coaches simply by making the field with talented teams every year.
It may not be this year... but it might. And when UGA is in that spot every year... they'll win every now and then.
re: So. Should ND have been in over Bama?
Posted by DawginSC on 1/1/26 at 7:23 pm to RobertFootball
Nope.
ND needed to have joined the ACC. They could have played essentially the same schedule... dropping Purdue/Arkansas/Boise State and added 3 ACC teams (they already play a ton of them).
They could then have played in and won the ACC championship and they'd get an auto bit and James Madison would have been left out.
ND just needed to be in a conference.
ND needed to have joined the ACC. They could have played essentially the same schedule... dropping Purdue/Arkansas/Boise State and added 3 ACC teams (they already play a ton of them).
They could then have played in and won the ACC championship and they'd get an auto bit and James Madison would have been left out.
ND just needed to be in a conference.
Better than last year so far.
Last year we had 3 games in the playoff decided by 3 points or less. We've already had 3 this year and we still have 4 games to go.
Last year we had 3 games in the playoff decided by 3 points or less. We've already had 3 this year and we still have 4 games to go.
quote:
Pampered vs blue collar
This is true. I think you can have a relatively blue collar team of highly rated recruits... but it's harder. I kind of feel like Bama and OSU may have gone too far in prioritizing talent over character/work ethic. I think teams like UGA and Oregon have largely been able to keep the team first dynamic despite having high levels of talent.
re: Georgia what’s your best win?
Posted by DawginSC on 1/1/26 at 6:51 pm to TrailDawg77
quote:
I love Dan Lanning as well
I love that he didn't bow down to the Deion hype and has continued to elevate Oregon football. I'm not a Oregon fan nor a hater, but I respect the hell out of Dan Lanning
If UGA loses tonight I'll be rooting for Oregon the rest of the way.
But if UGA wins, I will be hoping Indiana beats Oregon... specifically because I don't want to face Dan Lanning. When it comes to Elite coaches, I think Lanning is one of them. He's the one guy I hoped wouldn't go to Bama when Deboer was hired.
It's not that I think Deboer is bad... but I think Lanning is Nick Saban or Kirby Smart or Urban Meyer or Steve Spurrier level as a head coach.
quote:
Let's be honest though, did Bama belong in the playoffs? Yeah, they got us, but that's about it this year
They got in and won a game. So did Ole Miss.
The only other team in the playoff with a win against a playoff team that also won a playoff game this year is Indiana (who beat Oregon and Bama)
quote:
Just wanted you to know how it is with the shoe on the other foot lol
But it's not... we literally beat two teams who made the playoffs and won a playoff game this year. We also beat what will likely end up being the highest ranked non-playoff team.
We've literally got better wins than anyone.
To show how stupid and unimportant this stat is... if the UGA/Ole Miss game ends up like the first game which was 43-35, the SEC would end up outscoring the Big 10 in the second round of games.
And it will be just as meaningless.
And it will be just as meaningless.
re: Georgia what’s your best win?
Posted by DawginSC on 1/1/26 at 6:18 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
Georgia beat every team they played so far.
Accurate. One of only two teams who can still say that (though technically if Ole Miss wins tonight they could say it too).
UGA beat two playoff teams in the regular season. Both of those teams have won a game in this year's playoff.
We also beat Texas who was ranked 13th before bowl season and won.
How's that compare to the teams your squad has beaten?
We also beat Texas who was ranked 13th before bowl season and won.
How's that compare to the teams your squad has beaten?
re: Alabama first 4 loss team to make the playoffs
Posted by DawginSC on 1/1/26 at 6:14 pm to Errerrerrwere
Clemson was in the playoff last year. They finished with 4 losses. They lost in the first round rather than the second.
re: List of Teams that Scored More than 3 Points Against Indiana
Posted by DawginSC on 1/1/26 at 6:10 pm to Vulcan Materials
quote:
List of teams that beat Georgia
Alabama
I'm sure that is important for you. I hope you're still able to say that at the end of the season... it would mean UGA won the national title. I'm onboard with a meaningless loss to a random team each year if UGA wins the national title.
re: Coach Deboer - Year 3
Posted by DawginSC on 1/1/26 at 6:06 pm to Sevendust912
quote:
People are only saying Indiana Talent because of the name of the school...I see a shite ton of talented players out there manhandling the Tide
No, they're saying the talent is low because the players were mostly 3-stars coming out of high school.
I think what we're seeing is more of a difference in coaching and preparation as well as what we occasionally see in the CBB tournament where a team of 5-6 seniors with less talent outplay a team of 5-stars who are all true freshmen/sophomores.
I still don't think Indiana wins the title this year. I believe the blue chip ratio (half your players have to be 4 and 5-stars) will hold out like it has every other season that we've had recruiting rankings.
But still, this performance is impressive as hell. I just don't think they can keep it up for two more games against Oregon and then UGA/Ole Miss/Miami. Every one of those teams is much more talented.
re: Little Bros
Posted by DawginSC on 1/1/26 at 3:00 pm to Jdillard343434
quote:
You are the dip shite who wants to hear that dip shite todd Ellis the most annoying play caller ever I liked when the dumbass said clemson was going down you guys were going up and.dabo won another one yeah great color commentator
I like Todd Ellis. He's a complete homer with a made for radio voice. There aren't very many guys like that left in CFB. They're all "professional". Used to be we all had a guy like that.
quote:
Yeah, the team with the bye has the advantage.
Could it be that maybe the results have something to do with the fact the committee doesn't take SoS into account in how they rank teams and thus teams are likely getting ranked higher than they should be? Highlighted by the fact that outside last nights game, the favorite to win the game has won them?
Nah, it's gotta be that playing a really tough team the week before your game is an advantage right?
I disagree.
OSU was ahead of Miami in every computer ranking taking SOS into account. But OSU was off for 25 days while Miami was off for 11 since their last game.
If we were talking about 1 week vs 2 weeks, you'd be 100% right. But that isn't what having a bye means in the cfb playoff.
Having a bye means you will be playing again after a 26 day break... 4 weeks. Your opponent will only have an 11 day break... a week and a half.
I'd have no issue if the playoffs started a week after conference championships and games were played each week. I'd ABSOLUTELY want a bye then. But if you tell me I'll have a month long break while my opponent would have played 10 days before... I'd have to think about it. I'd definitely take Ole Miss and Oregon's path (playing JMU or Tulane) over a month long wait. Maybe not Miami/A&M or Bama/OU's draw.
quote:
Texas lost to Ohio State and Florida. I'm pretty sure Texas Tech is no worse than equal to Texas.
OSU has 67 blue chip players.
Florida has 52 blue chip players.
While UF for example has a lot of flaws, lack of talent isn't one of them.
It is a flaw for Texas Tech though. They have 21 blue chips. Texas by comparison has 58.
They're good. But not national championship good.
They only have 21 blue chip players on their roster.
Compare that to UGA (70), Bama (64), Oregon (58) or Miami (45).
Ole Miss is below the blue chip ratio of 50%, but they still have 36 blue chips.
Depth of talent goes a long way.
They only have 21 blue chip players on their roster.
Compare that to UGA (70), Bama (64), Oregon (58) or Miami (45).
Ole Miss is below the blue chip ratio of 50%, but they still have 36 blue chips.
Depth of talent goes a long way.
quote:
It's been this way for over 60 years.
Anyone who thinks it's better to not have a bye is stupid and often falls for confirmation bias.
No it hasn't.
Prior to the 12 team playoff, you might have a team who played in the CCG who had a game a week more recently than their opponent, but for the most part the two teams playing in any game had the same amount of layoff.
Now, we have teams who played 26 days ago... nearly 4 weeks... playing teams who played 12 days ago.
That's a pretty significant difference.
We're not talking about the NFL where the teams with byes are off 14 days compared to 7 for the team that had to play in the first round. That's a benefit to the bye team.
We're talking about the team with the bye being off for a month compared to 2 weeks for the team without the bye.
3 were in SEC championship games... so of course were in Atlanta.
The other was the NC win over Bama in Lucas Oil Stadium in Indiana.
The other was the NC win over Bama in Lucas Oil Stadium in Indiana.
quote:
Florida 0-5 on the road Florida 0-1 in Jacksonville Florida 4-2 at home
Other than Texas the home wins were Long Island, miss state and FSU.
They lost to USF and Tennessee at home. Let’s not pretend UF was very good at home this year.
quote:
Maybe if NIL went live in 2040 instead of 2021...or if a UGA alumnus suddenly founds a multibillion $ startup
I think those days are gone, we're moving to NFL Jr. which is a horrible decision IMO
I don't think Kirby will have a run like Saban... but I think it will still be seen as a run.
UGA either made the 12 team playoff or would have made a 12 team playoff had it existed every year Smart has been at UGA other than his first.
I do think it will be a rare thing for UGA to NOT be in the playoff any year going forward. And while UGA won't win a national title every year and probably won't win any back to back again, they'll win their share (1-2 a decade) because they'll have a shot every season.
Would you be shocked if in 2046 (30 years of Kirby Smart) he retired with 20-25 playoff appearances and 5-7 national titles (given he's already got 5 playoff appearances and 2-3 national titles in 10 seasons, only 2 of which had 12 team playoffs)
Note: The 2-3 above is there since UGA is still alive this season for a title.
Popular
1











