- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: City of Glendale, CA releases statement that they’re no longer cooperating with ICE
Posted on 6/9/25 at 7:52 am to SallysHuman
Posted on 6/9/25 at 7:52 am to SallysHuman
Sloflohomo believes that everything is static. 
0
Posted on 6/9/25 at 7:52 am to Powerman
quote:.
Taking away the ports in California would hurt the entire country you imbecile.
Let's dive into this. Yes, it would absolutely hurt the rest of the country because it would take years to build up infrastructure on the east coast, Gulf of America and on the northwest coast to make up for the loss, but the ports become useless to CA if they cant ship out of the state.
The military accounts for 5% of the states economy and real estate is 18% of the GDP. Who's going to move to the country of CA when they are cut off from all things U.S.?
This post was edited on 6/9/25 at 7:55 am
Posted on 6/9/25 at 7:52 am to Wellborn
quote:
I wholeheartedly disagree that this is the same concept.
Well watch how many times people call me a Democrat or assume I'm pro-illegal immigration for talking about their reactions to the riots exclusively. You'll see that same pattern over and over.
quote:
But I’m not going to continue trying to discuss this with you, as you clearly have diametrically opposite views on immigration
Well you just did it
quote:
and law enforcement.
Law enforcement has nothing to do with the OP, in the general sense.
quote:
And your confrontational, defensive tone
wut
quote:
implies you’re simply arguing for the sake of arguing,
Uh, no. I explained what I believe the strategy to be pages back.
You just didn't like it because you're trying to make the scenario in OP bigger than what it is.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 7:53 am to Padme
quote:
He is the local jester, gotta laugh about it, he thinks he’s the board cop
He ain't funny enough to laugh at. He's an unserious pot-stirring ignoramous.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 7:53 am to Padme
quote:
he thinks he’s the board cop
What a silly comment
Me disproving bad arguments/rhetoric isn't being a "board cop"
This post was edited on 6/9/25 at 7:54 am
Posted on 6/9/25 at 7:53 am to AubieinNC2009
quote:
How much of that is propped up by the US military or major US companies that would move their HQ back to America.
This.
It would also be quite a messy divorce, both internally in Cali and with the US. Number 1, most of those red counties would just go the "State of Jefferson" route, leaving a very thin California. I'm also quite sure the US would demand some coastline for the Navy.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 7:54 am to Powerman
quote:
Yeah we're watching how well that plan is unfolding right now dumbass.
Not every state is California... we have 49 other states that could use some cleaning up.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 7:55 am to SallysHuman
quote:
He ain't funny enough to laugh at. He's an unserious pot-stirring ignoramous.
What a melt
If California's GDP mythically dropped by half, it would be around Russia (and still bigger than Mexico, so explain how Mexico could afford to buy California)
Again, your "acktually" had no merit to the actual conversation.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 7:55 am to SallysHuman
quote:
Not every state is California... we have 49 other states that could use some cleaning up.
Point is, the plan is fricking stupid and we're seeing it play out in real time.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 7:56 am to wareagle7298
quote:
It would also be quite a messy divorce, both internally in Cali and with the US. Number 1, most of those red counties would just go the "State of Jefferson" route,
See, y'all always have to pivot on the actual argument and change what's being discussed.
quote:
. I'm also quite sure the US would demand some coastline for the Navy.
And then even more
Posted on 6/9/25 at 7:56 am to Wellborn
quote:
Why would they not want to help?!
Help deport all the illegal voters they have relied upon and will rely on for the 2026 midterms???
Posted on 6/9/25 at 7:58 am to Wellborn
Muh core values. Whenever you see that, it really means some bullshite progressive initiative.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 7:59 am to SDVTiger
You forgot Orange County. There are plenty of conservatives in that area. as well as the areas I like Calabash and Pasadena and Santa Monica / Culver City.. If you ever got off your fishing boat and traveled beyond the dock you would know. However California conservatives are not reactionary conservatives like yourself. For starters, unlike you they are not..............STUPID!
This post was edited on 6/9/25 at 8:01 am
Posted on 6/9/25 at 7:59 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
fed policy and participate in specific fed policies
They are fricking codified laws on the books you buffoon.
This post was edited on 6/9/25 at 8:00 am
Posted on 6/9/25 at 8:00 am to Powerman
quote:
We aren't going to be able to deport all 11 million or whatever the number is
Did you feel the same about the J6 protesters? Well if they haven’t committed any other crimes before blah blah blah. Or remember “no one is above the law” we have heard that for about 10 years. That doesn’t mean everyone to you??
Posted on 6/9/25 at 8:00 am to TrueTiger
quote:
Anyone without a proper ID
What is proper?
U.S. passport?
Sure.
Let's give Commiefornia a soft independence.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 8:01 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What a melt
Oh, NOW you respond.
quote:
If California's GDP mythically dropped by half, it would be around Russia (and still bigger than Mexico, so explain how Mexico could afford to buy California)
It might drop by more than that without the full faith and backing of the USA, ya think? They can't build a train, they can't clean up or rebuild the Palisades, they can't manage water (doesn't some of their flow come from other states?) They can't/won't do shite.
quote:
Again, your "acktually" had no merit to the actual conversation.
Not for an unserious pot-stirring ignoramous like you... some people here can think more clearly of cause and effect.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 8:02 am to Powerman
quote:
Point is, the plan is fricking stupid and we're seeing it play out in real time.
Because it's California. A lot of states would welcome crackdowns as managing immigration is a federal issue and in a lot of very important ways, States' hands are tied.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 8:02 am to kilo
quote:
They are fricking codified laws on the books you buffoon.
Yes, and the specific admin policies on those laws can lead to reactions by state and local governments, scholar.
The example in OP is an example of such a reaction. There is no law mandating localities or state prison systems help the feds. That's why these relationships are contractual and not statutory. There is nothing illegal or improper with a state/locality making a contractual decision within their rights to show approval (or disapproval) of fed policy.
As I said earlier, there may be a larger plan because the feds may not be able to execute this policy without the help of these state/local facilities.
This post was edited on 6/9/25 at 8:03 am
Posted on 6/9/25 at 8:03 am to kilo
Shhh....he's on a roll. In his element, probably jerking off to every post he's making in his perceived bubble of moral and intellectual superiority.
Page 5 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News