- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 3/21/19 at 12:46 am to xiv
Haha, you are trying so hard to not acknowledge the truth. It’s ok man..... it’s hard to face the facts sometimes. Hopefully one day you will not willingly be ignorant in an attempt to be some social justice warrior. Until then, I have nothing for you. Because no matter how many facts or thought provoking questions I ask. You have a mindset that is stuck in stone and are beyond reproach.
I will ask you one more question, why is it that these muslims are leaving their home countries in mass? What could possibly be causing them to move to far distant countries? And to countries that, according to you, are anti Muslim.
I will ask you one more question, why is it that these muslims are leaving their home countries in mass? What could possibly be causing them to move to far distant countries? And to countries that, according to you, are anti Muslim.
Posted on 3/21/19 at 12:50 am to jnethe1
Muslims are burning these churches?
Posted on 3/21/19 at 12:51 am to TOKEN
Nope, it’s white Christians who like trump
Posted on 3/21/19 at 12:53 am to xiv
quote:
In other words, I know it because I’m not a moron.
Posted on 3/21/19 at 12:58 am to jnethe1
quote:It’s you. You are trying to argue against basic math.
Haha, you are trying so hard to not acknowledge the truth.
What truth am I ignoring?
quote:No kidding.
I have nothing for you.
quote:I’ve said/implied nothing of the sort.
And to countries that, according to you, are anti Muslim.
Even if Muslims are 100x more violent than Christians, Christians in France are safer than Muslims in France because of their disparity in population. This is math. You can not argue against it.
Posted on 3/21/19 at 1:05 am to xiv
Is Islam compatible with Western civilization, yes or no?
Posted on 3/21/19 at 1:07 am to Armchair_QB
Not interested in giving you an interview based on your talking points. If you have a point to make, make it.
I only answered the question in the op with the basic math that is applied to every minority in every environment.
I only answered the question in the op with the basic math that is applied to every minority in every environment.
Posted on 3/21/19 at 1:09 am to xiv
Do you honestly believe that Muslims are less violent than whites/Christians? Honestly?
So you’re saying that the total number of violent acts perpetrated by non Muslims dwarfs that of Muslims?
I’m honestly just trying to understand your angle... lose the self labeled intellectual mindset
So you’re saying that the total number of violent acts perpetrated by non Muslims dwarfs that of Muslims?
I’m honestly just trying to understand your angle... lose the self labeled intellectual mindset
Posted on 3/21/19 at 1:15 am to xiv
I think it’s time for you to look into the mirror...
Posted on 3/21/19 at 1:20 am to jnethe1
quote:If you think I’ve said or implied anything of the sort, you’re a moron.
Do you honestly believe that Muslims are less violent than whites/Christians? Honestly?
quote:In France, it does. Muslims comprise of only 8% of the Population in France. Why aren’t you getting this?
So you’re saying that the total number of violent acts perpetrated by non Muslims dwarfs that of Muslims?
quote:This is math that a 6th grader do. I’m not exalting my own intellect—I’m questioning yours.
lose the self labeled intellectual mindset
There’s 11 whites to every brown in France. Let’s say we’ve got 1100 whites and 100 browns, and 1 of every 100 people commits an act of racial violence. Your average white has a .09% chance of getting attacked by a racist, while your average brown has a 11% chance of being attacked by a racist.
Let’s say that 1% of these whites commits a racist attack while 50% of the browns commit racist attacks. In this case, an average white has a 4.5% chance of being attacked by a brown racist, compared to the average brown’s 11%.
Racism and religious bigotry hurt minorities at rate that is exponentially higher than that of majorities, even when a minority is more racist than the majority .
There is no reason that you shouldn’t understand it at this point.
This post was edited on 3/21/19 at 1:22 am
Posted on 3/21/19 at 1:29 am to Armchair_QB
quote:Nah, my answer to your question is the opposite of what yours is; I’m just not interested in getting into a discussion about that with you. When it comes to that subject, I just don’t respect you enough to go in depth about it. I’d rather do that with people who are better than you.
fricking coward
Posted on 3/21/19 at 1:39 am to xiv
France has the largest Muslim population in Europe. Muslims make up about 11% of the population. The prison population in France is estimated to be about 70% Muslim. You try to sound smart but throwing out random numbers doesn't make them true.
Posted on 3/21/19 at 1:43 am to xiv
I’m just asking a question, why do much vitriol?
Again, just trying to get your angle. Lose the attitude.
Well you really don’t need to be questioning my education. In fact, I loathe those who reference their educational level in some vain attempt at giving their viewpoint more weight. It’s childish.
Ok, I thought that’s what you were getting at. But I really wanted you to clarify it because I didn’t think that someone would be this level of sjw.
So using your argument, I will lay out a scenario in which you will hopefully see how wrong your thinking is:
Let’s say a pharmaceutical company is testing some new medicines. One will go on to being commercially available, the other won’t.
The testing of the medicines reveals the following:
Medicine “a” had 16 people out of 100 display negative side effects.
Medicine “b” had 20 people out of 1000 display negative side effects.
Based on your method of thinking, medicine “a” would become commercially available simply because it had a lesser number of negative side effects. Albeit a much higher percentage.
In your vast knowledge, would this be the correct course of action?
Because in my opinion, I would have chosen the medicine that has a smaller percentage.
I’m certain that this will be met with you questioning my intelligence and calling me a moron. But let’s see, maybe this time we will get somewhere.
Again, just trying to get your angle. Lose the attitude.
Well you really don’t need to be questioning my education. In fact, I loathe those who reference their educational level in some vain attempt at giving their viewpoint more weight. It’s childish.
Ok, I thought that’s what you were getting at. But I really wanted you to clarify it because I didn’t think that someone would be this level of sjw.
So using your argument, I will lay out a scenario in which you will hopefully see how wrong your thinking is:
Let’s say a pharmaceutical company is testing some new medicines. One will go on to being commercially available, the other won’t.
The testing of the medicines reveals the following:
Medicine “a” had 16 people out of 100 display negative side effects.
Medicine “b” had 20 people out of 1000 display negative side effects.
Based on your method of thinking, medicine “a” would become commercially available simply because it had a lesser number of negative side effects. Albeit a much higher percentage.
In your vast knowledge, would this be the correct course of action?
Because in my opinion, I would have chosen the medicine that has a smaller percentage.
I’m certain that this will be met with you questioning my intelligence and calling me a moron. But let’s see, maybe this time we will get somewhere.
Posted on 3/21/19 at 1:47 am to tigersmanager
quote:Very well. Let’s assume, therefore, a 7:1 Ratio of Christians/whites to Muslims in France. For the average Christian/white to have a greater chance of being attacked by a Muslim than vice versa, the number of racial/religious attacks committed per Muslim would have to be >49x that of racial/religious attacks committed per Christian/white.
Muslims make up about 11% of the population.
quote:Assuming this number is proportional to the rate of violent acts committed, if the percentage of the French prison population that is Christian/white is greater than 1.43%, then it is mathematically safer to be a Christian in France than it is to be a Muslim in France.
The prison population in France is estimated to be about 70% Muslim.
Posted on 3/21/19 at 1:47 am to xiv
quote:
xiv
You need a statistics class, son.
Posted on 3/21/19 at 1:53 am to xiv
You can't really make your assertion out of total population. You would have to go by religion as according to reported violent crimes.
Posted on 3/21/19 at 1:54 am to xiv
quote:Twelve French Catholic Churches were attacked and vandalized this week alone. Paris's Church of Saint-Sulpice was severely damaged by arsonists. Acts targeting French JudeoChristians outstripped anti-Muslim acts 16-to-1 last year.
This isn’t my opinion. It’s math. You can’t argue with it.
Posted on 3/21/19 at 1:54 am to blackrose890
Your math shows how likely you are to encounter someone who is a Muslim.
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News