Church burnings in france

That’s an easy one - the non Christian immigrants?

Because life is statistically safer for the average Christian in France than it is for the average Muslim. Violence against Muslims in France will get more press since it’s more dangerous to be a Muslim in France than it is to be a Christian in France.

Fire. Ban it!

The Christian World allied with the Muslims to take down Communism, now the Muslim World has allied with the Communists to take down Christianity.

What’s your goat’s name?

It’s just how numbers work. 66% of the people in France are Christian (an additional 20ish% are secular white); ~8% are Muslim. In a vacuum, the average Muslim is, therefore, more than 100x as likely to be attacked by a Christian/white person than a Christian/white person is to be attacked by a Muslim. It’s impossible to analyze all other factors in good faith and come up with a result indicating that Muslims are a bigger problem for the rest of France than vice versa.

This isn’t my opinion. It’s math. You can’t argue with it. And that’s why the news covers white-on-black and white-on-brown in the US and in Europe, respectively, more often than vice versa. White people are the majority; therefore, they cause the majority of the problems.

Dude, what......
Please tell me you’re joking
Link to statistics??

quote:

---

Link to statistics??

---

The burden of that proof is yours.

France has about an 11:1 Christian/white-to-Muslim ratio.

If you have a room with 11 whites and 1 brown, and each person carries out a racist attack, the average white has a 1/11 chance of being attacked while the brown gets attacked 11 times. That is, in a French vacuum, the average brown person is 121 times as likely to be attacked by a racist than a white person is.

The number of acts of racial/religious acts of violence by Muslims would have to be 11x that of Christians/whites for us to determine that Christians/whites are less safe in France than Muslims are. The numbers shown here don't come close to showing that.

Well the situation you laid out is based off of everyone committing an act of violence. But that’s simply not true. To suggest that whites are just as likely to commit acts of violence as Muslims is purposefully being ignorant. If this were true, then why would these Muslims be moving to these predominantly white countries? It makes no sense. Also, if this were true, then why would anyone advocate for these Muslims to migrate to these predominantly white countries?

The data you linked only has three categories:
Those being:
1. Anti semitism 311
2. Anti Muslim 121
3. Racism 518

There are two points that come to mind from these statistics:

1. Isn’t it peculiar that the amount of anti semitism dwarfs the amount of anti Muslim violence? Why is that? Could it be the amount of Muslims that have migrated into France?
2. I see no statistic for the amount of violence towards whites/Christians. Why is this? Is this because they don’t experience any violence? Or is it because the attempt to perpetuate the rhetoric that these whites/Christians are actually the people who are violent?

quote:

---

The average Muslim in France is more likely to be attacked by a Christian/white than vice versa,

---

How do you know that? There’s no statistic for violence against whites/Christians.

What do you think is the reason that there is so much anti semitism?

And why is it that these Muslims are migrating to these supposedly racists/islamaphobic countries in which they are subjected to violence? And why would you advocate for them to migrate there? Do you enjoy them being subjected to the atrocities that you suggest they experience?