- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Chud the Builder case will be a referendum on self defense in America.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 8:48 pm to bhtigerfan
Posted on 5/15/26 at 8:48 pm to bhtigerfan
Biggest problem is he allegedly said before the incident that he wanted to go instigate people until they fight, and then he'd shoot them. If that is indeed true and they have the video, that's premeditation and he's fricked.
3
Posted on 5/15/26 at 8:50 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
good post.
quote:
boosiebadazz
shite...I change my mind
Posted on 5/15/26 at 8:53 pm to GRTiger
Posted on 5/15/26 at 9:13 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
What crap? Black people getting upset if you call them naggers to their face?
No. Allowing this two tiered justice system to continue. This was legit self defense and yet he’s held on bond. Karmelo Anthony stabbed a kid in the chest and killed him. Let out on bond.
Dejuan brown stabbed a random white girl in the neck with four other blacks around at the time. None of them did anything to help. Dejuan had 14 prior convictions and was out on the streets. Found incompetent.
What must be done is uncomfortable, but if we want society to ever get better something must be done.
This post was edited on 5/15/26 at 9:14 pm
Posted on 5/15/26 at 9:19 pm to bhtigerfan
If the dude was rolling around like he normally did calling people n word and all that jazz…maybe not. Doesn’t make it right but I can see how his normal behavior played for a jury could affect this. If he was at the courthouse for legal purposes and was confronted, you could be right.
This guy is a troublemaker, but there is absolutely an avenue that he really didn’t do anything wrong and could be be completely vindicated legally.
This guy is a troublemaker, but there is absolutely an avenue that he really didn’t do anything wrong and could be be completely vindicated legally.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 9:21 pm to jnethe1
quote:
This was legit self defense
He created the problem, solved it with a gun, and pretends he's an innocent victim.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 9:22 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Jail might be his personal hell, I suspect he is going to get his arse kicked, a lot.
He's gonna be a cumburper until he eventually bleeds out.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 9:22 pm to jnethe1
quote:
This was legit self defense
I agree this is pertinent, but what evidence do we have on this at this point?
Posted on 5/15/26 at 9:25 pm to g650Tide
quote:
Biggest problem is he allegedly said before the incident that he wanted to go instigate people until they fight, and then he'd shoot them. If that is indeed true and they have the video, that's premeditation and he's fricked.
Yep, if its true I think he's screwed.
Sometimes a guy just needs his arse kicked. Maybe if someone had legitimately whipped his arse in the past, he may have learned his lesson.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 9:28 pm to bhtigerfan
quote:
Chud the Builder case will be a referendum on self defense in America
Google says this guy is one of those Johnny Somali/Jack Doherty types. If he's as bad as they are and there's a lot of footage of his previous work, he's beyond fricked.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 9:34 pm to bhtigerfan
Chudthebuilder is exposing to the world the myth of white privilege.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 9:42 pm to boosiebadazz
What’s the law say about him starting it by being a pos?
I was just thinking. If we get in trouble for shooting an intruder after he has run a few steps, shouldn’t shooting someone who attacks you from the back after you’ve walked away be ok, even if you were the original aggressive count?
The initial crime is over. The original criminal is in retreat. You can’t just physically attack them can you? How do you not fear for your life if being attacked from the back after walking away?
Idk.
frick this Chud guy though. He’s a pos no matter how you slice it.
I was just thinking. If we get in trouble for shooting an intruder after he has run a few steps, shouldn’t shooting someone who attacks you from the back after you’ve walked away be ok, even if you were the original aggressive count?
The initial crime is over. The original criminal is in retreat. You can’t just physically attack them can you? How do you not fear for your life if being attacked from the back after walking away?
Idk.
frick this Chud guy though. He’s a pos no matter how you slice it.
This post was edited on 5/15/26 at 9:46 pm
Posted on 5/15/26 at 9:49 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
He created the problem, solved it with a gun, and pretends he's an innocent victim.
So you’re actually saying that it’s ok to attack someone because of their words? Got it
Posted on 5/15/26 at 9:53 pm to Old Money
quote:
Running your mouth looking to provoke people is not normal behavior.
Trump does it almost every day.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 9:53 pm to ReauxlTide222
I have no idea. I didn’t know who this guy was until Petti started the first thread.
Did some twitter searching and while he’s not my cup of tea, he’s owed due process like everyone else.
But like the Mall of La. Shooter, the analysis changes when there is probable cause and an arrest and then bail comes into play.
Objectively, he fired a gun in a public space and injured two people, and maybe killed one. He may ultimately be vindicated, but it’s a little disingenuous to rage about a two-tiered system at this point.
Did some twitter searching and while he’s not my cup of tea, he’s owed due process like everyone else.
But like the Mall of La. Shooter, the analysis changes when there is probable cause and an arrest and then bail comes into play.
Objectively, he fired a gun in a public space and injured two people, and maybe killed one. He may ultimately be vindicated, but it’s a little disingenuous to rage about a two-tiered system at this point.
This post was edited on 5/15/26 at 9:59 pm
Posted on 5/15/26 at 9:56 pm to jnethe1
quote:
So you’re actually saying that it’s ok to attack someone because of their words? Got it
No but I do understand human nature, which you seem to disregard.'
Posted on 5/15/26 at 9:58 pm to bhtigerfan
I don’t care what names someone is called or how they are verbally disrespected, there is no excuse for violence. If that person answers name calling with physical violence, the physical aggressor is at fault. Recognize it for what it is, some idiot who wants attention, and laugh the guy off. Whatever happened to self control?
Posted on 5/15/26 at 10:01 pm to boosiebadazz
I’m not sure. I’m just basing it off the pattern we all know.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 10:03 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
No but I do understand human nature, which you seem to disregard.'
One of the things that distinguishes humans from animals is self control. What you’re describing is animalistic. Hurting someone’s feelings doesn’t justify attacking them.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 10:07 pm to RandRules
quote:
Whatever happened to self control?
Some groups have been conditioned to treat any disrespek as reasons to attack someone.
Page 4 of 36
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News