Started By
Message
locked post

Chevron moving HQ out of CA

Posted on 8/2/24 at 8:36 am
Posted by Crimson Wraith
Member since Jan 2014
30050 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 8:36 am
Posted by Privateer 2007
Member since Jan 2020
7951 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 8:37 am to
Saw this coming
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
46991 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 8:37 am to
Isn’t Kamala from California?

Posted by LRB1967
Tennessee
Member since Dec 2020
23167 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 8:38 am to
They should have done that a long time ago
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140573 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 8:39 am to
Finally, they are pulling the trigger. They have been suggesting this for two decades.

They see the writing on the wall. The Texas Golden Triangle is going to be the economic engine of the U.S. if not the world in the next decade or so.
Posted by oldskule
Down South
Member since Mar 2016
25207 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 8:40 am to
Libs love it.....oil/gas bad!

Cali is a joke, trying to be globalists and looking like a fool doing so.
Posted by ldts
Member since Aug 2015
2908 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 9:09 am to
I'm honestly surprised they hadn't done it sooner. I don't see why a company would want to keep their HQ in a state that' so antagonistic to them.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
117542 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 9:42 am to
Wow, I thought all major oil companies were located in Houston.
Posted by LegalEazyE
Madison, Wisconsin
Member since Nov 2023
6292 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 9:57 am to
quote:


Saw this coming


Yup. Saw this coming from a mile away. I interviewed with them out there a few years ago and pretty much asked them point blank if this was going to happen.

I didn't want to uproot to that location, only to have to pick back up and move to Houston a short time later... and Houston would be one of the last places in the U.S. I would want to live. No offense to anyone from Houston here, it's just not one of my preferred locales. But I have friends who live in The Woodlands and they love it.
This post was edited on 8/2/24 at 10:58 am
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
87464 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 10:00 am to
Didn't know Chevron was headquartered there. Odd
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
37469 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 10:01 am to
Most of their operations staff has been operating out of Houston for a while. Pretty much since they merged with Texaco in 2001.
Posted by 2geaux
Georgia
Member since Feb 2008
2755 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 10:25 am to
WOW!! My Dad would have loved this! He grew up in Tx and spent his entire career with Chevron. Houston, NOLA, and overseas. Eventually, ending up in Cal and retiring as a VP. He passed 3 yrs ago and some of his last words to me were "take me back to Texas!"
Posted by Figgy
CenCal
Member since May 2020
10341 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 10:28 am to
quote:

Cali is a joke, trying to be globalists and looking like a fool doing so.


We’re moving to hydrogen for our energy future or the very least for it to be a piece of the energy puzzle.

I have no idea if that’s going to be good or bad in the long term (it will be beneficial for air quality around here but $$ are another matter) but that’s where the state is heading and a lot of it will be centered close to where I’m at. Here’s a link:

LA Times
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
85005 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 10:30 am to
Solid move for them, but its only around 2k jobs. Believe they have like 5k here in Houston currently.

Nonetheless, love the to California.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
62079 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 10:47 am to
Kamala wants to bring California’s failed experiment to the entire country
Posted by faraway
Member since Nov 2022
3785 posts
Posted on 8/3/24 at 5:16 am to
quote:


We’re moving to hydrogen for our energy future
bless your heart for thinking that but the ironic thing here is that the pioneer for this very thing was murdered for his alleged invention and work.
Posted by cadillacattack
the ATL
Member since May 2020
10736 posts
Posted on 8/3/24 at 6:45 am to

quote:

The Texas Golden Triangle is going to be the economic engine of the U.S. if not the world in the next decade or so.


Posted by UncleFestersLegs
Member since Nov 2010
16879 posts
Posted on 8/3/24 at 7:07 am to
quote:

I have no idea if that’s going to be good or bad in the long term
an extremely water intensive technology in California. Seems legit
This post was edited on 8/3/24 at 7:08 am
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
63396 posts
Posted on 8/3/24 at 7:08 am to
So Standard Oil of California is moving out of...California? Good job, Governor Hair Gel!
Posted by Squirrelmeister
Member since Nov 2021
3674 posts
Posted on 8/3/24 at 7:52 am to
quote:

Chevron moving HQ out of CA

The dumbass Californians hate the refinery in Richmond just down the road from the corporate headquarters. I hope they mothball that motherfricker and put it on barges and send it to China. frick the Californians. I hope they pay $20/gallon for gas and $2000 electricity bills. No offense.

quote:

We’re moving to hydrogen for our energy future or the very least for it to be a piece of the energy puzzle. I have no idea if that’s going to be good or bad in the long term

I would be a bad thing if it happened, but trust me it won’t happen. The only economical method to produce H2 is the steam methane reforming process with involves burning CH4 to make steam and taking another CH4 stream and mixing it with the steam in a catalyst bed to H2, CO, and CO2. Burning that H2 in a turbine would result in far more total energy consumed and far more carbine emissions that just burning methane.

I was at a trade show recently looking at turbines and engines where the manufacturers were so happy to display that they can run on pure H2 gas. I cornered one of the reps and said hey can you give me one example of a real customer in real life burning H2 to make electricity, and they guy was like hell no, it’s a joke, but by making the turbine H2 capable, we get ESG brownie points.

“Green” Hydrogen made using electrolysis with water as the main ingredient using power from only renewable sources is so outrageously costly that it will never be subsidized enough to catch on. Plus it still takes diesel engines and slaves all around the world to capture the minerals to make the solar panels and it takes crude oil to make all the cross-linked polyethylene that electric power cable insulation is made from, and it still takes diesel-driven trucks to cart around the hydrogen trailers. “Green hydrogen” will at best be an extremely expensive and extremely low volume fuel for idiots who like to smell their own farts.
This post was edited on 8/3/24 at 7:56 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram