- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Chauvin Verdict reached...GUILTY - ALL COUNTS
Posted on 4/20/21 at 5:03 pm to September 1948
Posted on 4/20/21 at 5:03 pm to September 1948
quote:Why do so many people keep talking about the potential for it to be overturned on appeal? The whole encounter was videotaped, so it's not like this was a case of circumstantial or questionable evidence, regarding who was even involved at all with potentially exculpatory evidence either hidden or yet to be discovered that can be brought on appeal.
One good thing is if it is overturned on appeal
I guess anything is possible, but the jury's decision itself, whether someone believes it was the right decision or not, is not really appealable, unless we find out that they were given incorrect instructions or something (but this was heavily covered so that should have been caught).
Posted on 4/20/21 at 5:05 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
Based on the video, with people screaming to Chauvin that he was killing Floyd, it looked like he was in a power trip mode, and only cared about establishing his power/dominance, without any regard for the consequences, including Floyd's death. In hindsight without the emotions of the moment, I'm sure he would have chose differently, but unfortunately, it doesn't matter because we can't change the past (at least not yet).
Even DCs colleagues attempted to deescalate DC, yet he disregarded any concern.
Posted on 4/20/21 at 5:05 pm to dgnx6
Policing themselves works for me; there won't be any
and there will be roving gangs.
They are on their own. Big fence to keep their lawless selves in.
edited for spelling
and there will be roving gangs.
They are on their own. Big fence to keep their lawless selves in.
edited for spelling
This post was edited on 4/20/21 at 5:31 pm
Posted on 4/20/21 at 5:07 pm to Tiguar
I think the Noor decision changed Minnesota's "depraved mind" standard. That will likely be appealed, and prior to Noor, I saw some MN jurists state that because Chauvin's actions were specific to Floyd (as opposed to a crowd), it would not be sustainable. In any event, it looks less like other states "depraved heart" and more like "reckless endangerment"
Posted on 4/20/21 at 5:27 pm to Eli Goldfinger
Ridiculous verdict.
At the most he should have been convicted for Manslaughter third degree.
At the most he should have been convicted for Manslaughter third degree.
Posted on 4/20/21 at 5:29 pm to September 1948
Whole lot of you racists showing your true colors up in here.
Posted on 4/20/21 at 5:35 pm to PubeCrab
So anyone who disagrees with the verdict is a racist?
Wanna try again? You can do better...I think.
Wanna try again? You can do better...I think.
Posted on 4/20/21 at 5:42 pm to Seldom Seen
These comments definitely did not disappoint ohh wee.
Posted on 4/20/21 at 5:50 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
Why do so many people keep talking about the potential for it to be overturned on appeal?
Let's say we put you on trial for some charge - "Being a dickhead tOSU fan" - and, whether or not you did it, leading up to the jury actually making their decisions a very important member of Congress said that folks should get confrontational, implicitly condoning violence if you were acquitted and the President of the United States called the Michigan head football coach and said he prayed that the jury did the right thing (by convicting your sorry arse).
Now, does it matter a single shite that you ARE a dickhead tOSU fan in those circumstances as to the question of whether or not you received a fair trial?
(ETA: Also, the media published all the information and bios of the jurors before they rendered the verdict, without names of course, because that isn't intimidating at all.)
This post was edited on 4/20/21 at 5:58 pm
Posted on 4/20/21 at 5:51 pm to chrisharrisbaby
This changes nothing. What time do the riots start?
Posted on 4/20/21 at 6:00 pm to Eli Goldfinger
Talk about a lynching.
Posted on 4/20/21 at 6:09 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
for some charge - "Being a dickhead tOSU fan
Guilty
Posted on 4/20/21 at 6:12 pm to PubeCrab
quote:
Whole lot of you racists showing your true colors up in here.
Racist doesn’t mean anything anymore because of people like you. Congrats.
Posted on 4/20/21 at 6:27 pm to dgnx6
DC was a sacrifice to BLM, Auntie Maxine, and Pedro Joe. He did not get a fair trial. DC did not cause the death of GF. GF was a dead man walking. Had DC not did his job, GF would've quietly died in his car just like any other junkie. If I were a police officer today, I would find another career. Maybe they will wake up when their neighborhood turns into the wild west.
Posted on 4/20/21 at 6:34 pm to September 1948
his wife divorced him


Posted on 4/20/21 at 6:51 pm to Category5
Nancy Pelosi’s comment got me 
Posted on 4/20/21 at 6:56 pm to WeBleedCrimson
I think we can all agree that at least we don't have to listen to George Floyd's crackhead opinion of the verdict.
Posted on 4/20/21 at 7:10 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
Why do so many people keep talking about the potential for it to be overturned on appeal? The whole encounter was videotaped, so it's not like this was a case of circumstantial or questionable evidence, regarding who was even involved at all with potentially exculpatory evidence either hidden or yet to be discovered that can be brought on appeal.
I guess anything is possible, but the jury's decision itself, whether someone believes it was the right decision or not, is not really appealable, unless we find out that they were given incorrect instructions or something (but this was heavily covered so that should have been caught).
They deliberated less than ten hours for a trail that took weeks to present the evidence. The jurors all live in the area and are afraid the mob will come after them if they do anything other than convict on all charges. There were activists in the courtroom taking pictures of the jury. Do you think they were doing that to get their autographs later? The jury was not sequestered they could see what the mob was capable of. The jury was intimated and there is no way Chauvin could have received a fair trial anywhere in the state. With the way these mobs are organized it is possible to argue that there is no place in the country he could get a fair trial unless the location of the trial is never revealed. Anywhere you go to try him the mob will follow and threaten everyone involved and the entire community if anything other conviction of all charges is the result. This isn't justice. This is vigilantism.
Popular
Back to top


2










