re: Chauvin Verdict reached...GUILTY - ALL COUNTS

quote:

---

And I'm sorry that your education failed you and that you don't understand what "potential" means.

---

I could take a "potentially" lethal amount of aspirin with one pill. It's nebulous and meaningless, which is why the experts in the field use statistical likelihood.

quote:

---

Bill Barr would not take potential federal charges off the table if Chauvin pleaded guilty. As a result, they didn't plea to 3rd-degree manslaughter. Buckeye is right.

---

That is possibly factually correct but that was not what was written nor the actual words used. There is nothing mentioning federal charges pending, thus my response. Further Barr should not have that ability even though they are federal. Also are you not surprised no federal charges brought?

quote:

---

Laugh your arse off all you want, but can you answer the question?
quote:
Didn't one of the witnesses for the prosecution, presumably an expert in the field, admit under oath that if he found a person dead in their apartment with that amount he'd rule it an OD?

---

to help you out that was referring to a hypothetical based upon the absence of all other findings and facts that applied to the real-world situation. Its a cute hypothetical the defense sold you on.
you may as well say that hypothetically the only way a fair game of rock paper scissors can be played is as long as my opponent can only use scissors. obviously in reality thats not a fair game, but this is a hypothetical situation so its fair because I said so.



GF's fentanyl level (.011 micrograms/ml) is less than half the mean all-cause fentanyl OD level (.024 micrograms/ml). It is less than 33% of the mean fentanyl OD (.034micrograms/ml) in the setting of mixed drug intoxication which is the most fitting comparison to make.
considering the actual reality of circumstances, not one of the medical professionals would claim there was a fatal OD.... it required an extreme imaginary scenario to even entertain.

LINK

quote:

---

Had you done so you'd have a much better view of what the experts actually said.

---

Which experts? The ones called by the defense or the ones called by the prosecution? That's why I said, and you seem to keep missing it, that I don't care what paid mouthpieces say. I don't care what the prosecution's said and I don't care what Chauvin's said. You, I suspect, are selective in which experts matter and which don't.

quote:

---

Which experts? The ones called by the defense or the ones called by the prosecution?

---

Both.