Started By
Message

re: CBS continues to lie about early Trump inauguration photo

Posted on 1/24/17 at 10:14 am to
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146695 posts
Posted on 1/24/17 at 10:14 am to
It's not about who is petty anymore. It is the media not reporting the news;but being the face and voice of the democratic party.

Posted by td01241
Savannah
Member since Nov 2012
22844 posts
Posted on 1/24/17 at 10:26 am to
In 2017 you are the only person with these videos and refuse to show anyone. Sorry people are skeptical. I don't like being a dick to other UGA fans but if it were real putting it on YouTube would be no issue.
Posted by Strophie
Member since Apr 2014
438 posts
Posted on 1/24/17 at 10:33 am to
quote:


look for yourself.

CNN Gigapixel proving media photos are fake/wrong time.



This thread is hilarious.

As has been discussed ad nauseam, there's a video showing the time lapse of the entire inauguration crowd. It never gets significantly larger than it does in all the "comparison" pictures. So you can argue about the CNN gigapixel photo or Trump's "sense" of the crowd or whatever else you want. The fact of the matter is that there's a video that very clearly and obviously shows that the crowd was significantly smaller.

I have to believe you guys are all being willful ignorant and just arguing for argument's sake.

As an Oregon fan, I think it's within my wheel house to post this picture as an analogy:



Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 1/24/17 at 10:52 am to
quote:

In 2017 you are the only person with these videos and refuse to show anyone.


Liar.

I've shown my videos to a lot of people and portions of my first video have been shown on several TV programs and are available for viewing on YouTube.

quote:

Sorry people are skeptical.


I expect people to be skeptical but I don't care because I KNOW the truth.

quote:

I don't like being a dick to other UGA fans but if it were real putting it on YouTube would be no issue.


I'm used to people being dicks to me about my sightings and videos even when they are from UGA because they know what the videos contain before they even see them.

As I just stated, portions of my first video have been shown on several TV programs and are available for viewing on YouTube.
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 1/24/17 at 11:00 am to

quote:

As has been discussed ad nauseam, there's a video showing the time lapse of the entire inauguration crowd. It never gets significantly larger than it does in all the "comparison" pictures




Yeah, there was hardly anyone at Trump's inauguration.
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 1/24/17 at 11:00 am to

quote:

As has been discussed ad nauseam, there's a video showing the time lapse of the entire inauguration crowd. It never gets significantly larger than it does in all the "comparison" pictures




Yeah, there was hardly anyone at Trump's inauguration.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
21894 posts
Posted on 1/24/17 at 11:00 am to
quote:

I expect people to be skeptical but I don't care because I KNOW the truth.



Are we talking about crowd size or the loch ness monster now? Because it could be either...
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69289 posts
Posted on 1/24/17 at 11:01 am to
He is trolling you regarding SF bay monster. No way he truly believes it
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
19942 posts
Posted on 1/24/17 at 11:04 am to
FFS, this whole issue just needs to die. I hate to bump this thread, but would you people just move on? This is the STUPIDEST thing to argue over. Hell, even Trump and Spicer have moved on.

Want to call out the media? Fine. Do it on issues that are not just measuring dicks.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83556 posts
Posted on 1/24/17 at 11:05 am to
quote:

Yeah, there was hardly anyone at Trump's inauguration.


so many strawmen, so little time
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 1/24/17 at 11:06 am to
quote:

He is trolling you regarding SF bay monster. No way he truly believes it


I don't truly "believe" it.

I truly KNOW it.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
21894 posts
Posted on 1/24/17 at 11:09 am to
quote:

No way he truly believes it


How is that different from you morons believing that the crowd size photos are faked? Just because his is a piece of seaweed doesn't make yours any more correct.
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
53771 posts
Posted on 1/24/17 at 11:13 am to
quote:

Firstly, Trump shouldn't care. He shouldn't be sending out his press secretary to lecture the press on the comparison of crowd size. I mean, holy shite.


Ok Stophie, give me the reason the photo was shown the afternoon of Trump inauguration...

was it not intended to make Trump look bad?

Was it not disrespectful and unnecessary?

yes or no?

Why would a new president "not care"...

Please explain it

furthermore, the CNN gigapixel paints a different perspective...it's looks very full to me with some exceptions
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
21894 posts
Posted on 1/24/17 at 11:15 am to
quote:

was it not intended to make Trump look bad?


It was, and it served wonderfully in that regard.

quote:

Was it not disrespectful and unnecessary?


It was necessary. Better to remind you guys that you're a minority.
Posted by td01241
Savannah
Member since Nov 2012
22844 posts
Posted on 1/24/17 at 11:16 am to
Melt on brotha
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56257 posts
Posted on 1/24/17 at 11:17 am to
quote:

the largest audience ever to witness and inauguration, period"?
cause it was

Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56257 posts
Posted on 1/24/17 at 11:19 am to
I'm ok being a minority. The majority of Americans are idiots.

Every time he moves his pen, a snowflake melts.
Posted by Strophie
Member since Apr 2014
438 posts
Posted on 1/24/17 at 11:43 am to
quote:

Ok Stophie, give me the reason the photo was shown the afternoon of Trump inauguration...

was it not intended to make Trump look bad?


It was shown because the media, as always, were looking for eyeballs. The knew that those who defended Trump's every move (like most on this board) would be filled with righteous indignation, and click/watch. They knew that those who hate Trump would be filled with glee, and click/watch. Looks like they were right, huh?

quote:

Was it not disrespectful and unnecessary?


Sure, it was unnecessary, depending on your point of view.

Was it any more "disrepectful" than the headlines and stories run by Fox News and others during Obama's presidency? Not in the slightest.

But I couldn't care less about the story, it's the response. Donald Trump, as the President of the United States, should be above squawking about his turnout numbers. He literally shouldn't care. It's embarrassing.

quote:

furthermore, the CNN gigapixel paints a different perspective...it's looks very full to me with some exceptions


ONCE AGAIN, you (and others) can argue about the Gigapixel photo all you want. Meanwhile, you are ignoring the time lapse video that shows the entire crowd from start to finish, which never gets close to as large as you are proclaiming.

You're literally blind to the evidence.

Posted by Nuts4LSU
Washington, DC
Member since Oct 2003
25468 posts
Posted on 1/24/17 at 11:50 am to
quote:

CBS continues to lie about early Trump inauguration photo
I just saw CBS This Morning show the photo that was obviously taken early in the morning of the Trump inauguration and implied it was taken when Trump was being being sworn in.

Why are they continuing to lie?


I have no idea what picture they used but I was right here in the middle of all of it in 2005, 2009, 2013 and 2017 and know damn well there is absolutely no comparison whatsoever between the size of the respective crowds. Trump's was EASILY, hands down the smallest inauguration crowd of the four. Nowhere even remotely close to any of the others, including Bush in 2005, which was also small compared to Obama's.

It's an irrelevant question, since he would be just as much the president if nobody showed up as he would be if 20 million did, which makes it really weird and alarming that he (not the media) feels compelled to lie about it. He is obviously very insecure and paranoid.
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 1/24/17 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

you are ignoring the time lapse video that shows the entire crowd from start to finish, which never gets close to as large as you are proclaiming.

You're literally blind to the evidence.




Meh, you are blind to this photo which shows there were people packed in all the way back to the Washington monument.

Even from this perspective, any large vacant areas would be easily seen.

BTW, I've already said that I'm sure more people attended each one of Obama's inauguration than attended Trump's inauguration but there were way more that attended Trump's inauguration than the presstitutes are claiming.
This post was edited on 1/24/17 at 12:13 pm
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram