re: Candice Owens is a straight up lunatic.

To whoever is curious about Charlie's murder, check out this video and start in around 42 minute mark.

ian Carroll explains Google trends out of D.C. and Israel

Google catalogs location, date and time of specific searches.

quote:

---

She’s been hot railing meth.

She just went Squints on us overnight almost.

---

Are you speaking Jive? Can you translate, please?

quote:

---

Are you speaking Jive? Can you translate, please?

---

She went off the deep send.

Squints Palladorous - Sandlot

quote:

---

What on Gods green earth makes yall think the media or FBI would/will give us the real story on Kirk’s assassination?

---

I'm not cynical. I'll wait until the case is made and then I will give that consideration. Assuming that one group will lie to you but then to never consider that another group might lie is a strange position to take.

It is as likely that Candace Owens is and will lie as it is that the government will lie. Her entire brand and her audience won't allow her to ever accept the government account. That makes her as compromised as anyone else.

quote:

---

It is as likely that Candace Owens is and will lie as it is that the government will lie. Her entire brand and her audience won't allow her to ever accept the government account. That makes her as compromised as anyone else.

---

I dont necessarily disagree with you. She could be comprised. Hard to trust anyone these days.

We need a wild and crazy conservative black chick body checking everyone, keeps people on their toes.

I’ve got nothing wrong with her & I’ve heard way crazier conspiracies come true than some of her claims. Not saying I 100% without doubt believe all her theories, but I haven’t seen on paper the lawsuits against her, someone please share any legit lawsuits against her from her allegations.

Because some of her allegations and the way she attacks (she’s like a pit bull on a T-bone) when she latches on, I wouldn’t want to be in her bad side for sure.

She’s easy on the eyes, a pretty woman, family, God/Jesus lover.

Let’s see what’s up with her new ones

quote:

---

So what? Burning jet fuel can make steel hotter, and hotter steel is weaker steel.

---

You need a constant source of fuel in order to burn the same area for long enough to do such a thing. It's not going to get hot enough to weaken all the way through. You don't throw a potato in the oven at 500 degrees for 2 minutes and expect a hot and cooked potato.

Also, the heat from fires rises. The temperatures cited for temps are the temps above the fire. The temperature to the sides of the fire are not as hot and quickly dissipate. Since you have vertical support columns, none of them are really going to be in the hottest parts of the fire. It would require the entire column being engulfed, and many columns at that. The first things that would actually weaken would be the horizontal supports, as they are above the flames. Floors would collapse in spots before the support beams failed.

And do you see all the fireball when the plane hits? That's where a good amount of the fuel is burned. Some still gets in there, but enough to light up every support beam for over an hour?

Plus, WT7 wasn't hit by planes and had no jet fuel in it. They say office fires did it, but again - you need a constant fuel source in the same area. Fires will travel as they consume fuel, not stay in a single spot long enough to weaken steel. Even in forest fires the trees will live and the tops of them won't be burnt at all because the fuel of the fire on the ground was consumed before it was hot enough to take down the tree.

quote:

---

Since you have vertical support columns, none of them are really going to be in the hottest parts of the fire.

---

Completely false.

Show me the math that supports your conclusions.

This is the diagram of the columns that were destroyed by the initial impact. That is extreme. The remaining columns would have supported the structure had it not been for the fire. ANY fire weakens steel. At about 400 degrees F steel is weakening. At about 1,100 degrees F steel has lost half its strength (depends on the steel). My BBQ pit heats to over 600 degrees F sometimes.

The remaining columns were way overstressed, the fire weakened the others, and failure resulted. Pointy hat conspiracists will always believe something else.

Here is a study on the collapse of WTC7

my god she's insane... with millions of followers who eat up her lies

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

Candice Owens thinks and analyzes far beyond 'The Overton Window' of "acceptable reality". I believe she possesses an extra intangible sense beyond the superficial or manufactured "reality".

Of course this makes many people very uncomfortable. Does this mean she "crazy", "insane" or a "liar"?

Musk. Sam Altman. Peter Thiel. (there are several others that could be added to the list like Zuckerberg and the WEF's Yuval Noah Harari, imo.)

There is obviously something off, seriously wrong, bizarre about each one.

IS it possible they are some sort of "hybrid-genetic human"? Already "Transhuman via genetics or nano-devices? AND / OR Demon-possessed?