Started By
Message

re: Can we at least all agree that there should be no such thing as "finding" ballots

Posted on 11/12/18 at 10:09 pm to
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73479 posts
Posted on 11/12/18 at 10:09 pm to
quote:

looks like the party that refused to give a hearing to merrick for a year.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 11/12/18 at 10:12 pm to
quote:

looks like the party that refused to give a hearing to merrick for a year.
Ya gotta love when a liberal literally compares the Senate doing something completely within its power to committing election fraud.

Posted by djmicrobe
Planet Earth
Member since Jan 2007
4970 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 1:05 am to
quote:

Any vote found that didn't remain in some sort of chain of custody can't be counted and the burden of proof for counting them is on the finder


I'M GETTING TIRED OF THE "EVERY VOET MUST BE COUNTED" mantra.
Everyone eligible to vote that registered can have their vote counted once.
Any ballot found AFTER the vote is over is automatically disqualified. Just because it is filled out does not mean it was filled out by a person who has not already voted.
If a county does not certify their results within 24 hours, then no votes in that county will be accepted. Follow the law or no votes in your county will be included. This will prevent these counties from continuing to vote incompetent people to be in charge of their vote counting.
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
23836 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 2:36 am to
quote:

So, what do you call finding a box of provisional ballots in a returned rental car?


Blank ballots in a car driven by an election supervisor? I call that trash.
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
42838 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 4:26 am to
quote:

Seems that it’s only republicans who claim that ballots were “found.” I will wait to see something confirmed before I join this linguistic game.


Ask Franken how he won his first election to the senate.
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64751 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 5:18 am to
quote:

Seems that it’s only republicans who claim that ballots were “found.”



Well golly gee bum, image that. Makes ya wonder huh.
Posted by mauser
Orange Beach
Member since Nov 2008
21747 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 5:20 am to
Do we need the national guard to control voting stations and ballots? I'm beginning to think yes.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 5:36 am to
quote:


looks like the party that refused to give a hearing to merrick for a year.


dont whine.


and you lying mother frickers STILL forget to mention that the Republicans only did EXACTLY WHAT THE DEMOCRATS SAID THEY WOULD DO if Bush had nominated anybody from late 2006 onward

Why can you not avoid lying at any opportunity where it helps your argument?
Posted by llfshoals
Member since Nov 2010
15534 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 5:46 am to
quote:

looks like the party that refused to give a hearing to merrick for a year.
The party who refused to do so was the Democratic Party. Or didn’t you know it was known as the Biden rule named after it’s creator.

Much like not needing 60 senators for certain votes is now known as the Reid rule.
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
11005 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 5:49 am to
quote:

Can we at least all agree that there should be no such thing as "finding" ballots


Yes we all agree to this, but to Dem's

"The ends justify the means". Their can be no scenario where they do not win.

Personally I do not think there is voter fraud, however I most certainly do think there is gross negligence in the democratic party coordinating voting efforts in Florida specifically Boward Co. In this day and age especially after 2000 that is inexcusable and should be intolerable. What they have done is de-legitimize the election process (possibly on purpose, but I think simply because they are fricking retarded and ignorant)

This is a quagmire that Trump will get bogged down in if he continues to wade into. Liberals have conditioned their supporters to not focus on the truth and instead win at all cost, so he will be looked at as the bad guy in this no matter what he does. He should stay out of it and let the results be what they are going to be and slam dunk the dems with it in 2020. Make them own they election meddling and I guarantee it will come back to bit the liberals in the arse in 2020.
Posted by llfshoals
Member since Nov 2010
15534 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 5:54 am to
quote:

He should stay out of it and let the results be what they are going to be and slam dunk the dems with it in 2020
No. he must fight, as should we all to protect our elections validity.

For if we do not have that, we might as well pick up the guns and start shooting.
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67506 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 6:03 am to
quote:

What the frick?

Dems....it's what they do
Posted by hogcard1964
Illinois
Member since Jan 2017
10610 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 6:04 am to
Did someone say 80,000 in Broward?
Posted by FredBear
Georgia
Member since Aug 2017
15040 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 6:09 am to
quote:

looks like the party that refused to give a hearing to merrick for a year.



You got Joe Biden to thank for that. We tried to warn you guys about unintended consequences down the road but you told us to frick off.
Then you got burned by your own tactic, just like you did from Harry Reid changing the confirmation rule for the Supreme Court.
You libs fricked yourself on both. You don't whine
Posted by oogabooga68
Member since Nov 2018
27194 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 6:22 am to
This kind of naked fraud is setting up the possibility that someone hurts the people trying to perpetrate the fraud. If that happens, I for one will not condemn those actions.
Posted by GeorgePaton
God's Country
Member since May 2017
4495 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 6:42 am to
Mode of operation for democrats. Election night....determine the candidate with the most votes. If the democrat candidate lost.....declare that additional ballots were found and submit those. Call in the crooked democrat lawyers to tie up the courts. In the meantime keep counting those late ballots.

Our electional process has been tainted and permanently damaged.

"It's not the people who vote that count, it's the people who count the votes." - Joseph Stalin

Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 7:05 am to
quote:

Can we at least all agree that there should be no such thing as "finding" ballots
Yes. Any ballot that leaves the chain-of-custody should be excluded ... anywhere and any time.
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
11005 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 8:00 am to
quote:

No. he must fight, as should we all to protect our elections validity.

For if we do not have that, we might as well pick up the guns and start shooting.



Notice I didn't say "Don't fight". His battle ground should be the campaign platform in 2020, as should every Conservative. The results are done the Dems control the House and the Republicans control the Senate. None of there races will change that. Margin of victory only counts in college football. I'm usually a opponent to taking the high road but in this care it' is the thing to do. fall back and prepare for the 2020 assault.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58194 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 8:07 am to
Bongino made a great point yesterday that I failed to catch. He said Democrats say," every vote should count" which sounds noble on the surface, but the phrase should be instead," every legal vote cours." It's a huge distinction.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram