re: BREAKING: Biden DOJ To Indict Trump Over Mar-a-lago Investigation

“Accidentally”

quote:

---

don’t think DOJ would indict a former office holder for classified information that was just accidentally packed in with other materials upon leaving office, especially if they are cooperative in returning the documents once discovered. I’d think there would have to be additional factual circumstances to justify an indictment.

---

You’re assuming the DOJ is acting consistently and honorably.

HRC intentionally set up servers for classified info and destroyed the evidence. They let her walk. Trumps lawyers were working with Archives on what to keep and return.

But he’s indicted and HRC walks.

So no. They aren’t consistent nor honorable.

The shitty thing is all these people are guilty of the same thing. The law doesn’t say you can take classified info if it’s “oopsies” and as long as you return it quickly.

It’s says it’s illegal to have it period. Biden is 100% guilty too.

So it’s all subjective to if the state wants to indict. They choose not to against any politician except trump.

quote:

---

They need Trump as a martyr and it's really all he has right now, there's nothing else he offers to energize the base.

---

You are utterly delusional

Another brick wall The DOJ NSD which is loaded with lawfare bloggers & Brennan accolades & acolytes, HAS NO OVERSIGHT.

How can this be overcome, when it was created under the feigned guise of 911 'national security?'

quote:

---

The all too familiar David Laufman says it out loud, but few will pay attention. “That’s what this is. It- just because [the DOJ-NSD justification for the raid on Trump] implicates classified information to me, doesn’t seem to give a platform for the House Intelligence Committee to intrude at this time,” Laufman says.

In the aftermath of 9-11 the U.S. government created the Dept of Homeland Security (DHS) to conduct surveillance of “domestic threats,” the American people. When Barack Obama and Eric Holder stepped in a few years later, they created the DOJ National Security Division (DOJ-NSD). This division specializes in weaponizing surveillance against their political enemies. The DOJ-NSD had no inspector general oversight and operates within Main Justice, but above the law. Essentially, they use the justification of ‘national security‘ to defend the Fourth Branch of Government, the permanent surveillance state. {Go Deep}

LINK

---

Stfu tird

I know you've said before they bulletproofed the IC from oversight, but there is no way I would have been able to go back and find that.

Can’t wait till you start eating bugs

I can decry the wrongful prosecution of someone without simultaneously campaigning for them to become President.

We don’t have to elect every wrongfully prosecuted person.

Maybe check my reply to you.

quote:

---

We don’t have to elect every wrongfully prosecuted person.

---

What happens when you ponder the fact that he's not being "wrongfully prosecuted" for what he did as a candidate or what he's doing in trying to be "elected"? The implications become much more complicated, without even trying to suggest that's why one should RE-elect him again.