Started By
Message

re: Bovino just told reporters the suspect was on scene several minutes interfering...

Posted on 1/25/26 at 6:18 pm to
Posted by berrycajun
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2016
7223 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 6:18 pm to
quote:

He never resisted but I don't expect a boot deepthroater to admit that so you're good.


Ok now you’re not even being serious anymore.
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge and Northshore LA
Member since Sep 2006
38468 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 6:20 pm to
quote:

You said there was no evidence. There was evidence.

You did not provide evidence. You provided your opinion.

Do you really think people who are licensed to conceal in carry actually carry around their guns without any bullets? The more likely, much more likely, scenario is he carrying with ammunition just like every other gun-toting American carries with ammunition. If he was going to cause maximum damage and massacre, LEO, why would he not do it earlier when he had open shots?

Again, this is real-time proof that the narrative that ice prevented mass casualties of law-enforcement is working.

Anyway, I also noticed you avoided the other question about his lies.

quote:

You're mad that you're stupid.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 6:20 pm to
quote:

You are a liar. Always have been. I used Graham and stated that Barnes expanded it.


I said

quote:

The totality standard doesn't mean you can go back in time to look at any potential external factor over years or decades. Graham v. Connor removed the subjective evaluation for the objective/reasonableness test. The underlying appellate court relied on a subjective test.



You said

quote:

No no toto! NOPE. You are not going to get away with trying to confuse people by asserting that the case is even about what I stated. AS EVERYBODY can clearly see I also talked about Barnes v. Felix.

As an "attorney" why would you try to confuse 2 cases?


LINK

Care to revise your statement?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 6:21 pm to
quote:

He showed up to a riot violent riot not only carrying but with extra magazines on his person.


So you felt the same about Kyle Rittenhouse?
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173789 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 6:23 pm to
quote:


So you felt the same about Kyle Rittenhouse?

Don't make people think
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 6:23 pm to
quote:

Dude. It's obvious they are pushing a narrative.

My narrative = quoting a Supreme Court case he doesn't understand.

quote:

These posts show up in google searches and they don't want their minions to read the rational truth or caselaw that destroys their narrative.

I literally quoted the case he's misapplying to destroy his NPC narrative
Posted by BCreed1
Alabama
Member since Jan 2024
6994 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 6:25 pm to
quote:

He has backed himself into a corner.

I don't get why he does that.



Dishonest broker................ That's all I got.
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
19829 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 6:25 pm to
quote:

He showed up to a riot violent riot not only carrying but with extra magazines on his person.

Carrying those extra magazines was a deliberate act. Deliberate acts require a motivation. Occam's razor would lead us to believe he thought he would need the rounds. He went there to oppose ice. What other conclusion would you come to?
I know the cops like to cite number of rounds and such to cast a negative light but while I think this guy put himself into an extreme risk, and paid the price, I don't think extra magazines demonstrates anything.

I mean there is a line there, sure... 20 mags in a carrier. One or two? Nah. I keep one on me and 2 in my bag. So this is just my personal view on the magazines [only].
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 6:26 pm to
quote:

Yet, he's getting logically dissembled

No

Posted by AlwysATgr
Member since Apr 2008
21017 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 6:30 pm to
quote:

He never resisted but I don't expect a boot deepthroater to admit that so you're good.


Humor us.

Why don't you take it from about the 25s mark and narrate his actions. And state it in bootlicker jargon so we don't misunderstand.

YT: Forbes

Posted by bamadontcare
Member since Jun 2013
3999 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 6:31 pm to
Yes.

This video shows the gun in his hand while fighting the cops

LINK
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 6:31 pm to
quote:

Yes.

This video shows the gun in his hand while fighting the cops

LINK


Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
150384 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 6:31 pm to
quote:

These ACKTUALLY attempts to weakly spin will not sit well with the voting populace.
his name will live on in infamy if Dems can run roughshod over all the local elections and they can all keep the daycares in business for the regular folk
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
28170 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 6:33 pm to
quote:

Well then he deserved to be shot


For reaching into his waistband? Happens all the time.
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
19829 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 6:34 pm to
quote:


Yes.

This video shows the gun in his hand while fighting the cops
did you link the wrong video or something?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

This video shows the gun in his hand while fighting the cops

LINK


Pretty sure that video shows LEO with a gun out also, just FWIW
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
24273 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

You did not provide evidence. You provided your opinion.


I provided facts and potential motivations.

That is evidence.

You're just more mad that you're stupid.

quote:

The more likely, much more likely, scenario is he carrying with ammunition just like every other gun-toting American carries with ammunition


This is stupid and incredibly unlikely.

quote:

If he was going to cause maximum damage and massacre, LEO, why would he not do it earlier when he had open shots?


Perhaps he kept waiting to see the gestapo behavior he was so sure would happen because Tim Walz and Jacob Frey told him it would. Who knows, he's a lunatic, his presence there is ironclad evidence he's mentally disturbed.

quote:

Anyway, I also noticed you avoided the other question about his lies.


What lies?

Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
23220 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 6:36 pm to
quote:

They can assume that the deceased intended to cause mass destruction and massacre LEO all they want. It doesn’t make it factual.


The assumption is factual, and the law reflects that.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 6:37 pm to
quote:

did you link the wrong video or something?


The dishonest content creators have no lows.

Guy in that video is tan on bluejeans and has his face covered like LEO with what looks to be a tactical helmet.

The decedent was brown on khaki and I don't think he had his face covered with a baseball cap I think
Posted by AlwysATgr
Member since Apr 2008
21017 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 6:38 pm to
quote:

bamadontcare


Isn't that the video of the LEO walking away after taking Pretti's gun?
Jump to page
Page First 16 17 18 19 20 ... 26
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 18 of 26Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram