- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Biden Autopen Review Finds ‘Criminal’ Evidence of ‘Impersonating the President’
Posted on 6/2/25 at 1:40 pm to Auburn1968
Posted on 6/2/25 at 1:40 pm to Auburn1968
Oh no! Not the autopen!
First, its legal. Second, this is not an uncommon thing. Third, trump has admitted to using it himself.
Who fricking cares?
Presidents have used autopens for decades. Now Trump objects to Biden’s use of one
First, its legal. Second, this is not an uncommon thing. Third, trump has admitted to using it himself.
Who fricking cares?
Presidents have used autopens for decades. Now Trump objects to Biden’s use of one
1
Posted on 6/2/25 at 1:48 pm to lotik
quote:
Oh no! Not the autopen!
First, its legal. Second, this is not an uncommon thing. Third, trump has admitted to using it himself.
Who fricking cares?
You can't be this stupid. right? There is a huge difference between using the autopen to sign things the president has considered and approved. It's a completely different situation if the president has no idea what is on the table whether due to cognitive impairment or just being asleep most of the time while unelected people use the pen to carry out their personal agendas. We need to get to the bottom of this.
This post was edited on 6/2/25 at 1:49 pm
Posted on 6/2/25 at 1:53 pm to LSU Patrick
How the frick does signing something mean you know anything about it? Trump literally has them explained to him right before he signs, and responds like he has never frickin heard of some of them.
This post was edited on 6/2/25 at 1:55 pm
Posted on 6/2/25 at 1:55 pm to lotik
Lowjack still working!
Posted on 6/2/25 at 1:58 pm to lotik
quote:
How the frick does signing something me you know anything about it?
You really are a fricking moron. You can't see the difference between someone briefing you on something you know little about and using that info to make a decision versus someone else just signing it for you without even asking you about it? You may be as demented as Joe.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 2:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Hard to use the 25th when the committee that was actually running the country covered up the fact that he was not capable.
quote:
Then change the Constitution.
Or we could prosecute the vile that perpetrated this fraud on the citizens of this country.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 2:02 pm to LSU Patrick
Please answer my question. I''ll attempt to make it simpler.
Can you know for sure someone has read something by their signature?
Can you know for sure someone has read something by their signature?
Posted on 6/2/25 at 2:03 pm to CAD703X
quote:
all they have to do is trot him out and give him the script 'say that you approved it' in front of the cameras for activity [x] and then the news will turn to how trump's latest conspiracy is that biden didn't approve [x] but he went on live tv and said he did so that settles it and trump is a dangerous threat to our democracy for going after his aides.
So wouldn't he also have to give a reason why he was incapacitated to the point he couldn't personally sign the pardons. And if he was that incapacitated, was the country in jeopardy at that time as well? What is the chain of command if the President has to go under for surgery and is that announced to the public?
Posted on 6/2/25 at 2:05 pm to lotik
quote:
Can you know for sure someone has read something by their signature?
Yes. That's what an investigation is for. I'm sure you would just be fine with someone signing the title of your vehicle or home over to themselves with your autopen. I mean, we just should assume you knew since you signed it.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 2:05 pm to Auburn1968
Just think of what they could charge these scumbags with. We can start off with identity theft and fraud on the elderly. It can then go all the way up to treason.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 2:07 pm to LSU Patrick
Sure buddy. Let's investigate every president's use of the autopen. Then let's investigate the rest of the country for using docusign.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 2:08 pm to MMauler
quote:
Just think of what they could charge these scumbags with. We can start off with identity theft and fraud on the elderly. It can then go all the way up to treason.
This is the fanfiction we've all come to loathe about the poli board
Posted on 6/2/25 at 2:12 pm to lotik
quote:
Sure buddy. Let's investigate every president's use of the autopen.
Fine, but logic would tell us to begin by investigating the president and administration that was verifiably demented and made every attempt to lie and cover it up. Like many on your side of the isle, you are too deluded to think with any logic or objectivity.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 2:16 pm to LSU Patrick
No. No it wouldn't. Logically, if every recent president used autopen, it shouldn't surprise us if Biden did.
Your burden of proof is going to rely on provable cognitive state, which at this point is a whole lot of hearsay.
Your burden of proof is going to rely on provable cognitive state, which at this point is a whole lot of hearsay.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 2:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
I'm really tired of posters of all sides of the spectrum suggesting treason prosecutions...lack of constitutional knowledge aggravates the crap out of me.
Article III Section 3
Treason against the United States, shall consist only of levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.
There are a lot of other more appropriate charges that can be brought against people involved in the use of the Biden autopen.
Article III Section 3
Treason against the United States, shall consist only of levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.
There are a lot of other more appropriate charges that can be brought against people involved in the use of the Biden autopen.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 2:21 pm to Lg
quote:
What is the chain of command if the President has to go under for surgery and is that announced to the public?
normally the pres signs over power temporarily to the vp, like dubya to cheney during his colonoscopy
trump chose to get his arse scoped without anesthesia and avoid this when he was rushed to walter reed for the same procedure
interesting choice
Posted on 6/2/25 at 2:40 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This is the fanfiction we've all come to loathe about the poli board
No, what the poli board has come to loathe are complete f*cking morons who think that they have even a modicum of intelligence. You, of course, are the f*cking worst because you’re a complete f*cking retard who will regurgitate anything you read on the Internet that supports your complete f*cking insanity.
This post was edited on 6/2/25 at 5:41 pm
Posted on 6/2/25 at 2:42 pm to vl100butch
quote:
There are a lot of other more appropriate charges that can be brought against people involved in the use of the Biden autopen.
If there is some degree of proof of foreign involvement/dictating policy, then that shoe fits like Cinderella.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 2:45 pm to sidewalkside
So what “dull” objects should we be chasing Mr fricking Genius?
Posted on 6/2/25 at 3:06 pm to lotik
There is a difference between using an autopen to sign a happy birthday note and some staffer obstructing a major program with consequences like shutting down natural gas liquefaction when the senile president didn't have a clue about it. The distinction seems to allude you.
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News