- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Biden Autopen Review Finds ‘Criminal’ Evidence of ‘Impersonating the President’
Posted on 6/2/25 at 4:52 pm to lotik
Posted on 6/2/25 at 4:52 pm to lotik
quote:
When did staffers make policy decisions? Which staffer did this?
Joe, would you like chocolate or vanilla?
Even though there are 29 other flavors to choose from.
It's called manipulation.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 4:52 pm to Auburn1968
quote:
Biden Autopen Review Finds ‘Criminal’ Evidence of ‘Impersonating the President’
Is this more of Comer's yammering?
I'ma tell you what. If he fails on this, which he probably will, he's going to be the undisputed KING of all bark and no bite.
Jim Jordan is gonna be like "Damn son. You know, you can make your idiot electorate think your doing shite by just going on Hannity... You don't ACTUALLY have to do anything."
Posted on 6/2/25 at 4:55 pm to dgnx6
What will it take for you engage with the comments at hand? We can make up any amount of hypotheticals you want. It doesn't change the fact that the only place this shite has happened is your head.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 4:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:legal question for you:
I don't even think this is an actual rule.
Could it be? Theoretically, but it's unlikely.
my dad had a rubber stamp made of his signature, he used it to speed up the project approval process when he was working and needed to sign multiple documents
after he retired, he kept it in his desk
if he had left his checkbook laying around, and one day i wrote myself a check unbeknownst to him, rubber stamped his signature, and took it to the bank and cashed it, would i be guilty of anything?
and if so, how is it different from someone using Biden’s autopen without his knowledge?
Posted on 6/2/25 at 4:59 pm to lotik
quote:
Every fricking link explains that all recent presidents have used it.
Having a staffer use it to congratulate someone for trivial social things is very different than having a guy who gets lost in his own closet being impersonated by a gaggle of demprogs with a radical leftist agenda.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 5:00 pm to lotik
quote:
I'd recommend trying a few different ones
Found one already:
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 6/2/25 at 5:05 pm to TrueTiger
I guess we'll have to take his word for it, just like Biden's.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 5:10 pm to lotik
quote:
Just because you keep saying "we know" doesn't make your argument any more persuasive.
Are you saying you believe Biden had the capacity to know what was being signed?
quote:
That needs to happen with evidence he shouldn't have signed something, which you never seem to have.
Your twisted “logic”: You: You never have evidence.
Me: a reasonable person could easily conclude he was cognitively impaired.
You: you can’t prove that.
Me: there should be an investigation, then.
You: OMG…..YOU CANT INVESTIGATE.
So convenient. You didn’t look up “Res Ipsa.” If you did, you didn’t understand it.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 5:14 pm to TrueTiger
This has been looked into. The autopen is used to sign mass bulk letters/Christmas Cards. Trump signs his own letters he has said.
Biden autopen signature appears on almost every document
Biden autopen signature appears on almost every document
Posted on 6/2/25 at 5:15 pm to lotik
Biden autopen signature appears on almost every document
This post was edited on 6/2/25 at 5:17 pm
Posted on 6/2/25 at 5:21 pm to BBONDS25
Bro, you're making the claim! You have to provide the proof. It can't be "just look around! don't you see!"
Your idea is that we should investigate any claim that is made without evidence?
RICO. What's your point? You can't launch an investigation of this sort just on hearsay.
Your idea is that we should investigate any claim that is made without evidence?
RICO. What's your point? You can't launch an investigation of this sort just on hearsay.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 5:22 pm to Auburn1968
quote:
Biden Autopen Review Finds ‘Criminal’ Evidence of ‘Impersonating the President’
So, which is the biggest "Criminal" charge for "impersonation"?:
a) Biden's so-called signature, aka "Autopen"
b) Biden's fleet of different body-doubles in bad masquerading as "President"
c) Biden's wife, staffers, cabinet and handlers who assumed Presidential authority illegally, thereby nullifying any EO, Legislation or Bill ever "approved" via Autopen
d) Biden's wife, staffers, cabinet and handlers pulling off this entire scheme "un-noticed" and without any Media or Republicans calling it out
Posted on 6/2/25 at 5:24 pm to cajunangelle
Would you have the same qualm if he signed with an electronic signature? Or does it have to be wet? How many witnesses are needed? Should we do a breathalyzer and hair sample to make sure they aren't under the influence?
Posted on 6/2/25 at 5:24 pm to lotik
Perhaps a reading and comprehension test to make sure they fully understand the material.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 5:25 pm to lotik
quote:
can't launch an investigation of this sort just on hearsa
Posted on 6/2/25 at 5:27 pm to pevetohead
NO. Just another criminal mafia that will all write books about how treason is justified if it harms Trump. The MSM will proclaim them all heroes as they make millions on the day show circuit.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 5:27 pm to cajunangelle
CA, I know you hate me but if I may…
You are arguing with a radical leftist that understands they got away with it.
She’s simply doing a bat flip with all these posts.
Ok. Thanks for indulging me. Back to insults.
You are arguing with a radical leftist that understands they got away with it.
She’s simply doing a bat flip with all these posts.
Ok. Thanks for indulging me. Back to insults.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 5:30 pm to roadGator
Funny. You remind me of the leftists at universities trying to tell students not to engage with certain people in conversation.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 5:31 pm to lotik
Sounds awesome but complete bullshite. I didn't tell her to not engage you.
You super smart radical leftists are supposed to be super smart.
You super smart radical leftists are supposed to be super smart.
This post was edited on 6/2/25 at 5:33 pm
Posted on 6/2/25 at 5:32 pm to sidewalkside
Only morons are people that voted for a demented fool and word salad kamala.
Popular
Back to top


1






