- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Biden admin plans to put US under UN rule during future global emergency events
Posted on 7/7/23 at 6:26 am to Kjnstkmn
Posted on 7/7/23 at 6:26 am to Kjnstkmn
GTFO - Not legal in America under our Constitution.
This alone qualifies for impeachment as it doesn’t protect us from outside influences
This alone qualifies for impeachment as it doesn’t protect us from outside influences
This post was edited on 7/7/23 at 6:29 am
Posted on 7/7/23 at 6:26 am to Junky
quote:
go against the Constitution
Yeah this would normally be my go to but the Constitution was pretty much shredded during COVID and this administration pretty much wipes its collective arse with it on the regular...
Who enforces SCOTUS knocking this down?
Posted on 7/7/23 at 6:30 am to The Maj
It’s just that the people will believe anything.
A late night tv host could ask people on the street:
And some will say
Same with,
They will ahhe the same answer.
A late night tv host could ask people on the street:
quote:
Should Kyle Rittenhouse be executed for the Orlando Nightclub Shooting?
And some will say
quote:
Oh absolutely.
Same with,
quote:
Should a one-world govt control the US during a crisis?
They will ahhe the same answer.
Posted on 7/7/23 at 6:30 am to The Maj
quote:
Who enforces SCOTUS knocking this down?
this is a major flaw in our system, SCOTUS has no teeth to order "stop immediately" and "follow the constitution"
the left just ignores the rulings for years
Posted on 7/7/23 at 6:32 am to dr
quote:
the left just ignores the rulings for years
Exactly and / or drags it out or rephrases it so it has to be challenged again...
Posted on 7/7/23 at 6:33 am to Kjnstkmn
We have been fricked, thank the GOP for being useless and Uniparty
Posted on 7/7/23 at 6:37 am to Kjnstkmn
We cannot cede the sovereignty of this nation to a bunch of unelected global bureaucrats. We endured many encroachments of our hard fought independence and freedoms but this would be too far to accept. And you can bet we'd ALWAYS be in some kind of emergency crisis to justify perpetual UN control.
Imagine spending March 2020 to May 2023 being run by the UN. That just cannot be allowed.
Imagine spending March 2020 to May 2023 being run by the UN. That just cannot be allowed.
Posted on 7/7/23 at 6:53 am to The Maj
quote:
Who enforces SCOTUS knocking this down?
It would be very contentious, no doubt.
Posted on 7/7/23 at 6:55 am to Kjnstkmn
Senate will never go along with something like that.
Posted on 7/7/23 at 6:56 am to Kjnstkmn
That's not just a no. It is a HELL NO!
Posted on 7/7/23 at 7:25 am to Kjnstkmn
I will gladly join in and ante up in a fight to challenge this as I know our feckless "Republican" politicians in DC won't do it.
Posted on 7/7/23 at 7:27 am to Kjnstkmn
Good to see Agenda 21 making the comeback.
Y’all got any Jade Helm stories?
Y’all got any Jade Helm stories?
Posted on 7/7/23 at 7:31 am to Kjnstkmn
A President can delegate his decision making to anyone he wants. That does not bind the next President. Neither does it have the force of law unless congress passes bills.
The answer is to vote against candidates who would take direction from UN clowns.
The answer is to vote against candidates who would take direction from UN clowns.
Posted on 7/7/23 at 7:32 am to LemmyLives
"litigated"?
It will be rejected and nullified and the Fed 'government' will be essentially discredited and shut down. This is inevitable as the money printing machine will break down, sooner or later. The Fed owns this, albeit our supposed 'public servants' let em' do it.
Posted on 7/7/23 at 7:36 am to Kjnstkmn
And this is where State governments need to be clear on their stance in dealing with any blue hats that set foot in their state border. In my eyes any blue hat solider on American land given any kind of authority, is an act of war, and citizen militias will have every right to handle them accordingly. These soldiers should be aware that they may be kissing their family goodbye for the last time.
States need to make it very clear they will not follow any foreign direction on anything.
My biggest concern is them getting hidden in the antifa types.
States need to make it very clear they will not follow any foreign direction on anything.
My biggest concern is them getting hidden in the antifa types.
Posted on 7/7/23 at 7:48 am to Kjnstkmn
Good. The first time it is used separating the true Americans from the ones who need eliminated will be easier.
Let's just get to the main event already. I am in my 50s and not getting any younger. LFG!
Let's just get to the main event already. I am in my 50s and not getting any younger. LFG!
Posted on 7/7/23 at 7:53 am to SeeeeK
quote:
would quickly be heard by supreme court, and probably be a 8-1 or 9-0 win for americans.
Not trying to be cute, but what biden signed, it would mean the supreme court has no standing.
Posted on 7/7/23 at 7:54 am to trinidadtiger
Link us to what he signed
Posted on 7/7/23 at 7:55 am to Kjnstkmn
I was told the New World Order was yet just another conspiracy…hmmm
Posted on 7/7/23 at 8:26 am to Kjnstkmn
Biden won't have a Military if he continues his present philosophy.
Popular
Back to top


0





