Started By
Message

re: Biden admin plans to put US under UN rule during future global emergency events

Posted on 7/7/23 at 6:26 am to
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
19210 posts
Posted on 7/7/23 at 6:26 am to
GTFO - Not legal in America under our Constitution.

This alone qualifies for impeachment as it doesn’t protect us from outside influences
This post was edited on 7/7/23 at 6:29 am
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
30551 posts
Posted on 7/7/23 at 6:26 am to
quote:

go against the Constitution


Yeah this would normally be my go to but the Constitution was pretty much shredded during COVID and this administration pretty much wipes its collective arse with it on the regular...

Who enforces SCOTUS knocking this down?
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
40338 posts
Posted on 7/7/23 at 6:30 am to
It’s just that the people will believe anything.


A late night tv host could ask people on the street:

quote:

Should Kyle Rittenhouse be executed for the Orlando Nightclub Shooting?

And some will say
quote:

Oh absolutely.



Same with,
quote:

Should a one-world govt control the US during a crisis?

They will ahhe the same answer.
Posted by dr
texas
Member since Mar 2022
1321 posts
Posted on 7/7/23 at 6:30 am to
quote:

Who enforces SCOTUS knocking this down?


this is a major flaw in our system, SCOTUS has no teeth to order "stop immediately" and "follow the constitution"

the left just ignores the rulings for years
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
30551 posts
Posted on 7/7/23 at 6:32 am to
quote:

the left just ignores the rulings for years


Exactly and / or drags it out or rephrases it so it has to be challenged again...
Posted by burke985
UGANDA
Member since Aug 2011
28920 posts
Posted on 7/7/23 at 6:33 am to
We have been fricked, thank the GOP for being useless and Uniparty
Posted by Pax Regis
Alabama
Member since Sep 2007
15268 posts
Posted on 7/7/23 at 6:37 am to
We cannot cede the sovereignty of this nation to a bunch of unelected global bureaucrats. We endured many encroachments of our hard fought independence and freedoms but this would be too far to accept. And you can bet we'd ALWAYS be in some kind of emergency crisis to justify perpetual UN control.

Imagine spending March 2020 to May 2023 being run by the UN. That just cannot be allowed.
Posted by Junky
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2005
9224 posts
Posted on 7/7/23 at 6:53 am to
quote:

Who enforces SCOTUS knocking this down?


It would be very contentious, no doubt.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37202 posts
Posted on 7/7/23 at 6:55 am to
Senate will never go along with something like that.
Posted by LRB1967
Tennessee
Member since Dec 2020
23168 posts
Posted on 7/7/23 at 6:56 am to
That's not just a no. It is a HELL NO!
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
38336 posts
Posted on 7/7/23 at 7:25 am to
I will gladly join in and ante up in a fight to challenge this as I know our feckless "Republican" politicians in DC won't do it.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
85566 posts
Posted on 7/7/23 at 7:27 am to
Good to see Agenda 21 making the comeback.

Y’all got any Jade Helm stories?
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55407 posts
Posted on 7/7/23 at 7:31 am to
A President can delegate his decision making to anyone he wants. That does not bind the next President. Neither does it have the force of law unless congress passes bills.

The answer is to vote against candidates who would take direction from UN clowns.
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
39628 posts
Posted on 7/7/23 at 7:32 am to
"litigated"? It will be rejected and nullified and the Fed 'government' will be essentially discredited and shut down. This is inevitable as the money printing machine will break down, sooner or later. The Fed owns this, albeit our supposed 'public servants' let em' do it.
Posted by KAGTASTIC
Member since Feb 2022
7989 posts
Posted on 7/7/23 at 7:36 am to
And this is where State governments need to be clear on their stance in dealing with any blue hats that set foot in their state border. In my eyes any blue hat solider on American land given any kind of authority, is an act of war, and citizen militias will have every right to handle them accordingly. These soldiers should be aware that they may be kissing their family goodbye for the last time.

States need to make it very clear they will not follow any foreign direction on anything.

My biggest concern is them getting hidden in the antifa types.
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
24801 posts
Posted on 7/7/23 at 7:48 am to
Good. The first time it is used separating the true Americans from the ones who need eliminated will be easier.

Let's just get to the main event already. I am in my 50s and not getting any younger. LFG!
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
19955 posts
Posted on 7/7/23 at 7:53 am to
quote:

would quickly be heard by supreme court, and probably be a 8-1 or 9-0 win for americans.


Not trying to be cute, but what biden signed, it would mean the supreme court has no standing.

Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
85566 posts
Posted on 7/7/23 at 7:54 am to
Link us to what he signed
Posted by cbtullis
Atlanta
Member since Apr 2004
6897 posts
Posted on 7/7/23 at 7:55 am to
I was told the New World Order was yet just another conspiracy…hmmm
Posted by Gus007
TN
Member since Jul 2018
14691 posts
Posted on 7/7/23 at 8:26 am to
Biden won't have a Military if he continues his present philosophy.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram