- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Best description of the Flock Camera invasion.
Posted on 6/27/26 at 8:09 am
Posted on 6/27/26 at 8:09 am
Zero Hedge at 7:05 pm Friday ran an article titled "how to push back against the advancing beast system". Embedded in it was a 22 minute video about the 100,000 flock camera's installed and operating to track your every move both in car and on foot. The first six minutes tells it all. It's the very best description by a counter flock guy.
The whole article covers other surveillance topics and kind of goes into the weeds. Strongly suggests non-compliance as the means of pushing back, ie write a check instead of electronic payment. I think a quality 223 rifle/scope may be a logical approach rather than shooting stop signs. There are communities banning Flock.
No I do not have a link. And it's not a non-compliance issue . My tech started with doing tray-tray distillation calculations with a slide rule and I limited out a couple years ago on the evolution
11
Posted on 6/27/26 at 8:15 am to Trevaylin
High trust societies don’t need flock.
Just saying.
Just saying.
Posted on 6/27/26 at 8:17 am to Trevaylin
quote:what
I think a quality 223 rifle/scope may be a logical approach rather than shooting stop signs.
Posted on 6/27/26 at 8:24 am to TrueTiger
The only societies that need flock cameras are totalitarian ones.
The fact that this is happening across red states in red counties tells me all I need to know about what the GOP is really all about and that Tucker is right.
I will vote for AF candidates of my choosing but I’m not at all sure I want to remain a “republican” if this is what voting “Republican” is going to get me.
The fact that this is happening across red states in red counties tells me all I need to know about what the GOP is really all about and that Tucker is right.
I will vote for AF candidates of my choosing but I’m not at all sure I want to remain a “republican” if this is what voting “Republican” is going to get me.
Posted on 6/27/26 at 8:40 am to Trevaylin
My community does not allow Flock, but every community surrounding us, does.
Posted on 6/27/26 at 8:57 am to TrueTiger
quote:
High trust societies don’t need flock.
Just saying.
And you can't have a high trust society when you have powerful people hellbent on importing those whose very existence in your country is a violation of trust. It becomes even tougher when you have a large amount of the populace so near-sighted that they are willing to agree with that importation.
Posted on 6/27/26 at 9:03 am to Trevaylin
quote:
100,000 flock camera's
quote:
Flock license plate readers are now equipped with SignalTrace to sweep up unique identifiers of mobile phones, wearables like smart watches and AirPods, and other Bluetooth-enabled devices in passing vehicles.
Why?
So law enforcement can “identify suspects by the unique mix of devices they carry or use” without the need of a warrant.
Not only do they know where your car is, they know who is riding with you, or has ever ridden with you, and they can search their database to find out everywhere you’ve been.
Posted on 6/27/26 at 9:18 am to paperwasp
Link?
Posted on 6/27/26 at 9:19 am to Trevaylin
Flock of Seagulls is better.
Posted on 6/27/26 at 9:24 am to Trevaylin
quote:Should be used at the border for the invasion photos and then in the interior to round them up for removal.
Flock Camera invasion.
Posted on 6/27/26 at 9:25 am to Trevaylin
Was readying a few days ago where they are haphazardly throwing those things up and some are being placed erroneously on private property.
Posted on 6/27/26 at 9:28 am to Night Vision
They are also being cut down and the metals being harvested to the tune of about ~$300
Posted on 6/27/26 at 9:28 am to Trevaylin
quote:
I think a quality 223 rifle/scope may be a logical approach rather than shooting stop signs.
The Brits have grinders they cut the poles with in just a few seconds.
Posted on 6/27/26 at 10:30 am to HubbaBubba
quote:
Link?
quote:
License plate cameras can track your AirPods, smartwatch, and more, disturbing study finds
The new sensors are made by a defense company whose primary customers are U.S. law enforcement agencies
(The Independent)
Posted on 6/27/26 at 10:37 am to Trevaylin
quote:why not link the fricking story? Thx
Zero Hedge
Posted on 6/27/26 at 10:50 am to White Bear
do I need to explain slide rules again for you?
Posted on 6/27/26 at 10:59 am to tide06
Posted on 6/27/26 at 11:08 am to Trevaylin
Blade Runners: One Man Destroys EVERY SINGLE ULEZ Camera In His London Borough
Posted on 6/27/26 at 11:15 am to paperwasp
quote:
SignalTrace to sweep up unique identifiers of mobile phones, wearables like smart watches and AirPods, and other Bluetooth-enabled devices in passing vehicles.
This only has a capture rate of about 10-15% of passerbys at most. Not supporting flock cameras, but just discussing this particular add-on. This technology has been used in traffic studies for years.
ETA: edited to add that it could be possible that this is a brand new cutting edge version that has a higher capture rate. I’m not trying to claim that I have access to all the newest stuff. But this stuff has been around for a while.
This post was edited on 6/27/26 at 11:23 am
Posted on 6/27/26 at 11:29 am to Trevaylin
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News